Cargando…

The environmental risks of neonicotinoid pesticides: a review of the evidence post 2013

Neonicotinoid pesticides were first introduced in the mid-1990s, and since then, their use has grown rapidly. They are now the most widely used class of insecticides in the world, with the majority of applications coming from seed dressings. Neonicotinoids are water-soluble, and so can be taken up b...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wood, Thomas James, Goulson, Dave
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5533829/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28593544
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9240-x
_version_ 1783253678463909888
author Wood, Thomas James
Goulson, Dave
author_facet Wood, Thomas James
Goulson, Dave
author_sort Wood, Thomas James
collection PubMed
description Neonicotinoid pesticides were first introduced in the mid-1990s, and since then, their use has grown rapidly. They are now the most widely used class of insecticides in the world, with the majority of applications coming from seed dressings. Neonicotinoids are water-soluble, and so can be taken up by a developing plant and can be found inside vascular tissues and foliage, providing protection against herbivorous insects. However, only approximately 5% of the neonicotinoid active ingredient is taken up by crop plants and most instead disperses into the wider environment. Since the mid-2000s, several studies raised concerns that neonicotinoids may be having a negative effect on non-target organisms, in particular on honeybees and bumblebees. In response to these studies, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) was commissioned to produce risk assessments for the use of clothianidin, imidacloprid and thiamethoxam and their impact on bees. These risk assessments concluded that the use of these compounds on certain flowering crops poses a high risk to bees. On the basis of these findings, the European Union adopted a partial ban on these substances in May 2013. The purpose of the present paper is to collate and summarise scientific evidence published since 2013 that investigates the impact of neonicotinoids on non-target organisms. Whilst much of the recent work has focused on the impact of neonicotinoids on bees, a growing body of evidence demonstrates that persistent, low levels of neonicotinoids can have negative impacts on a wide range of free-living organisms.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5533829
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55338292017-08-11 The environmental risks of neonicotinoid pesticides: a review of the evidence post 2013 Wood, Thomas James Goulson, Dave Environ Sci Pollut Res Int Review Article Neonicotinoid pesticides were first introduced in the mid-1990s, and since then, their use has grown rapidly. They are now the most widely used class of insecticides in the world, with the majority of applications coming from seed dressings. Neonicotinoids are water-soluble, and so can be taken up by a developing plant and can be found inside vascular tissues and foliage, providing protection against herbivorous insects. However, only approximately 5% of the neonicotinoid active ingredient is taken up by crop plants and most instead disperses into the wider environment. Since the mid-2000s, several studies raised concerns that neonicotinoids may be having a negative effect on non-target organisms, in particular on honeybees and bumblebees. In response to these studies, the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) was commissioned to produce risk assessments for the use of clothianidin, imidacloprid and thiamethoxam and their impact on bees. These risk assessments concluded that the use of these compounds on certain flowering crops poses a high risk to bees. On the basis of these findings, the European Union adopted a partial ban on these substances in May 2013. The purpose of the present paper is to collate and summarise scientific evidence published since 2013 that investigates the impact of neonicotinoids on non-target organisms. Whilst much of the recent work has focused on the impact of neonicotinoids on bees, a growing body of evidence demonstrates that persistent, low levels of neonicotinoids can have negative impacts on a wide range of free-living organisms. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2017-06-07 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5533829/ /pubmed/28593544 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9240-x Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Review Article
Wood, Thomas James
Goulson, Dave
The environmental risks of neonicotinoid pesticides: a review of the evidence post 2013
title The environmental risks of neonicotinoid pesticides: a review of the evidence post 2013
title_full The environmental risks of neonicotinoid pesticides: a review of the evidence post 2013
title_fullStr The environmental risks of neonicotinoid pesticides: a review of the evidence post 2013
title_full_unstemmed The environmental risks of neonicotinoid pesticides: a review of the evidence post 2013
title_short The environmental risks of neonicotinoid pesticides: a review of the evidence post 2013
title_sort environmental risks of neonicotinoid pesticides: a review of the evidence post 2013
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5533829/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28593544
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11356-017-9240-x
work_keys_str_mv AT woodthomasjames theenvironmentalrisksofneonicotinoidpesticidesareviewoftheevidencepost2013
AT goulsondave theenvironmentalrisksofneonicotinoidpesticidesareviewoftheevidencepost2013
AT woodthomasjames environmentalrisksofneonicotinoidpesticidesareviewoftheevidencepost2013
AT goulsondave environmentalrisksofneonicotinoidpesticidesareviewoftheevidencepost2013