Cargando…

Characterizing expanded access and compassionate use programs for experimental drugs

OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the characteristics of “expanded access” and “compassionate use” programs registered in ClinicalTrials.gov and to determine the percentage of drugs provided through these programs that ultimately received FDA marketing approval. RESULTS: We identified 398 expanded a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miller, Jennifer E., Ross, Joseph S., Moch, Kenneth I., Caplan, Arthur L.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5534121/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28754150
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-017-2687-5
_version_ 1783253731315286016
author Miller, Jennifer E.
Ross, Joseph S.
Moch, Kenneth I.
Caplan, Arthur L.
author_facet Miller, Jennifer E.
Ross, Joseph S.
Moch, Kenneth I.
Caplan, Arthur L.
author_sort Miller, Jennifer E.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the characteristics of “expanded access” and “compassionate use” programs registered in ClinicalTrials.gov and to determine the percentage of drugs provided through these programs that ultimately received FDA marketing approval. RESULTS: We identified 398 expanded access and compassionate use programs (hereafter referred to as expanded access programs) registered on ClinicalTrials.gov. Industry funded 61% (n = 241) of programs individually or collaboratively, while NIH and the US Federal Government rarely funded programs (3% [n = 11] and 2% [n = 6], respectively). Most programs provided access to drugs (71% [n = 282]), 11% to biologics (n = 43), and 10% to medical devices (n = 40). These programs covered 460 unique conditions, the most common being HIV (n = 26), leukemia (22), and multiple myeloma (n = 14). Only 2% of programs reported results in ClinicalTrials.gov. Most programs (82%) were open to enrolling adults and seniors (n = 326). These programs provided access to 210 unique experimental drugs, of which 76% have received FDA approval.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5534121
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55341212017-08-03 Characterizing expanded access and compassionate use programs for experimental drugs Miller, Jennifer E. Ross, Joseph S. Moch, Kenneth I. Caplan, Arthur L. BMC Res Notes Research Note OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the characteristics of “expanded access” and “compassionate use” programs registered in ClinicalTrials.gov and to determine the percentage of drugs provided through these programs that ultimately received FDA marketing approval. RESULTS: We identified 398 expanded access and compassionate use programs (hereafter referred to as expanded access programs) registered on ClinicalTrials.gov. Industry funded 61% (n = 241) of programs individually or collaboratively, while NIH and the US Federal Government rarely funded programs (3% [n = 11] and 2% [n = 6], respectively). Most programs provided access to drugs (71% [n = 282]), 11% to biologics (n = 43), and 10% to medical devices (n = 40). These programs covered 460 unique conditions, the most common being HIV (n = 26), leukemia (22), and multiple myeloma (n = 14). Only 2% of programs reported results in ClinicalTrials.gov. Most programs (82%) were open to enrolling adults and seniors (n = 326). These programs provided access to 210 unique experimental drugs, of which 76% have received FDA approval. BioMed Central 2017-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5534121/ /pubmed/28754150 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-017-2687-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Note
Miller, Jennifer E.
Ross, Joseph S.
Moch, Kenneth I.
Caplan, Arthur L.
Characterizing expanded access and compassionate use programs for experimental drugs
title Characterizing expanded access and compassionate use programs for experimental drugs
title_full Characterizing expanded access and compassionate use programs for experimental drugs
title_fullStr Characterizing expanded access and compassionate use programs for experimental drugs
title_full_unstemmed Characterizing expanded access and compassionate use programs for experimental drugs
title_short Characterizing expanded access and compassionate use programs for experimental drugs
title_sort characterizing expanded access and compassionate use programs for experimental drugs
topic Research Note
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5534121/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28754150
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-017-2687-5
work_keys_str_mv AT millerjennifere characterizingexpandedaccessandcompassionateuseprogramsforexperimentaldrugs
AT rossjosephs characterizingexpandedaccessandcompassionateuseprogramsforexperimentaldrugs
AT mochkennethi characterizingexpandedaccessandcompassionateuseprogramsforexperimentaldrugs
AT caplanarthurl characterizingexpandedaccessandcompassionateuseprogramsforexperimentaldrugs