Cargando…
Characterizing expanded access and compassionate use programs for experimental drugs
OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the characteristics of “expanded access” and “compassionate use” programs registered in ClinicalTrials.gov and to determine the percentage of drugs provided through these programs that ultimately received FDA marketing approval. RESULTS: We identified 398 expanded a...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5534121/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28754150 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-017-2687-5 |
_version_ | 1783253731315286016 |
---|---|
author | Miller, Jennifer E. Ross, Joseph S. Moch, Kenneth I. Caplan, Arthur L. |
author_facet | Miller, Jennifer E. Ross, Joseph S. Moch, Kenneth I. Caplan, Arthur L. |
author_sort | Miller, Jennifer E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the characteristics of “expanded access” and “compassionate use” programs registered in ClinicalTrials.gov and to determine the percentage of drugs provided through these programs that ultimately received FDA marketing approval. RESULTS: We identified 398 expanded access and compassionate use programs (hereafter referred to as expanded access programs) registered on ClinicalTrials.gov. Industry funded 61% (n = 241) of programs individually or collaboratively, while NIH and the US Federal Government rarely funded programs (3% [n = 11] and 2% [n = 6], respectively). Most programs provided access to drugs (71% [n = 282]), 11% to biologics (n = 43), and 10% to medical devices (n = 40). These programs covered 460 unique conditions, the most common being HIV (n = 26), leukemia (22), and multiple myeloma (n = 14). Only 2% of programs reported results in ClinicalTrials.gov. Most programs (82%) were open to enrolling adults and seniors (n = 326). These programs provided access to 210 unique experimental drugs, of which 76% have received FDA approval. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5534121 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55341212017-08-03 Characterizing expanded access and compassionate use programs for experimental drugs Miller, Jennifer E. Ross, Joseph S. Moch, Kenneth I. Caplan, Arthur L. BMC Res Notes Research Note OBJECTIVE: We sought to determine the characteristics of “expanded access” and “compassionate use” programs registered in ClinicalTrials.gov and to determine the percentage of drugs provided through these programs that ultimately received FDA marketing approval. RESULTS: We identified 398 expanded access and compassionate use programs (hereafter referred to as expanded access programs) registered on ClinicalTrials.gov. Industry funded 61% (n = 241) of programs individually or collaboratively, while NIH and the US Federal Government rarely funded programs (3% [n = 11] and 2% [n = 6], respectively). Most programs provided access to drugs (71% [n = 282]), 11% to biologics (n = 43), and 10% to medical devices (n = 40). These programs covered 460 unique conditions, the most common being HIV (n = 26), leukemia (22), and multiple myeloma (n = 14). Only 2% of programs reported results in ClinicalTrials.gov. Most programs (82%) were open to enrolling adults and seniors (n = 326). These programs provided access to 210 unique experimental drugs, of which 76% have received FDA approval. BioMed Central 2017-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5534121/ /pubmed/28754150 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-017-2687-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Note Miller, Jennifer E. Ross, Joseph S. Moch, Kenneth I. Caplan, Arthur L. Characterizing expanded access and compassionate use programs for experimental drugs |
title | Characterizing expanded access and compassionate use programs for experimental drugs |
title_full | Characterizing expanded access and compassionate use programs for experimental drugs |
title_fullStr | Characterizing expanded access and compassionate use programs for experimental drugs |
title_full_unstemmed | Characterizing expanded access and compassionate use programs for experimental drugs |
title_short | Characterizing expanded access and compassionate use programs for experimental drugs |
title_sort | characterizing expanded access and compassionate use programs for experimental drugs |
topic | Research Note |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5534121/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28754150 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13104-017-2687-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT millerjennifere characterizingexpandedaccessandcompassionateuseprogramsforexperimentaldrugs AT rossjosephs characterizingexpandedaccessandcompassionateuseprogramsforexperimentaldrugs AT mochkennethi characterizingexpandedaccessandcompassionateuseprogramsforexperimentaldrugs AT caplanarthurl characterizingexpandedaccessandcompassionateuseprogramsforexperimentaldrugs |