Cargando…

Rehabilitation plus OnabotulinumtoxinA Improves Motor Function over OnabotulinumtoxinA Alone in Post-Stroke Upper Limb Spasticity: A Single-Blind, Randomized Trial

Background: OnabotulinumtoxinA (BoNT-A) can temporarily decrease spasticity following stroke, but whether there is an associated improvement in upper limb function is less clear. This study measured the benefit of adding weekly rehabilitation to a background of BoNT-A treatments for chronic upper li...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Devier, Deidre, Harnar, JoAnn, Lopez, Leandro, Brashear, Allison, Graham, Glenn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5535163/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28696373
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxins9070216
_version_ 1783253824017793024
author Devier, Deidre
Harnar, JoAnn
Lopez, Leandro
Brashear, Allison
Graham, Glenn
author_facet Devier, Deidre
Harnar, JoAnn
Lopez, Leandro
Brashear, Allison
Graham, Glenn
author_sort Devier, Deidre
collection PubMed
description Background: OnabotulinumtoxinA (BoNT-A) can temporarily decrease spasticity following stroke, but whether there is an associated improvement in upper limb function is less clear. This study measured the benefit of adding weekly rehabilitation to a background of BoNT-A treatments for chronic upper limb spasticity following stroke. Methods: This was a multi-center clinical trial. Thirty-one patients with post-stroke upper limb spasticity were treated with BoNT-A. They were then randomly assigned to 24 weeks of weekly upper limb rehabilitation or no rehabilitation. They were injected up to two times, and followed for 24 weeks. The primary outcome was change in the Fugl–Meyer upper extremity score, which measures motor function, sensation, range of motion, coordination, and speed. Results: The ‘rehab’ group significantly improved on the Fugl–Meyer upper extremity score (Visit 1 = 60, Visit 5 = 67) while the ‘no rehab’ group did not improve (Visit 1 = 59, Visit 5 = 59; p = 0.006). This improvement was largely driven by the upper extremity “movement” subscale, which showed that the ‘rehab’ group was improving (Visit 1 = 33, Visit 5 = 37) while the ‘no rehab’ group remained virtually unchanged (Visit 1 = 34, Visit 5 = 33; p = 0.034). Conclusions: Following injection of BoNT-A, adding a program of rehabilitation improved motor recovery compared to an injected group with no rehabilitation.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5535163
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55351632017-08-04 Rehabilitation plus OnabotulinumtoxinA Improves Motor Function over OnabotulinumtoxinA Alone in Post-Stroke Upper Limb Spasticity: A Single-Blind, Randomized Trial Devier, Deidre Harnar, JoAnn Lopez, Leandro Brashear, Allison Graham, Glenn Toxins (Basel) Article Background: OnabotulinumtoxinA (BoNT-A) can temporarily decrease spasticity following stroke, but whether there is an associated improvement in upper limb function is less clear. This study measured the benefit of adding weekly rehabilitation to a background of BoNT-A treatments for chronic upper limb spasticity following stroke. Methods: This was a multi-center clinical trial. Thirty-one patients with post-stroke upper limb spasticity were treated with BoNT-A. They were then randomly assigned to 24 weeks of weekly upper limb rehabilitation or no rehabilitation. They were injected up to two times, and followed for 24 weeks. The primary outcome was change in the Fugl–Meyer upper extremity score, which measures motor function, sensation, range of motion, coordination, and speed. Results: The ‘rehab’ group significantly improved on the Fugl–Meyer upper extremity score (Visit 1 = 60, Visit 5 = 67) while the ‘no rehab’ group did not improve (Visit 1 = 59, Visit 5 = 59; p = 0.006). This improvement was largely driven by the upper extremity “movement” subscale, which showed that the ‘rehab’ group was improving (Visit 1 = 33, Visit 5 = 37) while the ‘no rehab’ group remained virtually unchanged (Visit 1 = 34, Visit 5 = 33; p = 0.034). Conclusions: Following injection of BoNT-A, adding a program of rehabilitation improved motor recovery compared to an injected group with no rehabilitation. MDPI 2017-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5535163/ /pubmed/28696373 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxins9070216 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Devier, Deidre
Harnar, JoAnn
Lopez, Leandro
Brashear, Allison
Graham, Glenn
Rehabilitation plus OnabotulinumtoxinA Improves Motor Function over OnabotulinumtoxinA Alone in Post-Stroke Upper Limb Spasticity: A Single-Blind, Randomized Trial
title Rehabilitation plus OnabotulinumtoxinA Improves Motor Function over OnabotulinumtoxinA Alone in Post-Stroke Upper Limb Spasticity: A Single-Blind, Randomized Trial
title_full Rehabilitation plus OnabotulinumtoxinA Improves Motor Function over OnabotulinumtoxinA Alone in Post-Stroke Upper Limb Spasticity: A Single-Blind, Randomized Trial
title_fullStr Rehabilitation plus OnabotulinumtoxinA Improves Motor Function over OnabotulinumtoxinA Alone in Post-Stroke Upper Limb Spasticity: A Single-Blind, Randomized Trial
title_full_unstemmed Rehabilitation plus OnabotulinumtoxinA Improves Motor Function over OnabotulinumtoxinA Alone in Post-Stroke Upper Limb Spasticity: A Single-Blind, Randomized Trial
title_short Rehabilitation plus OnabotulinumtoxinA Improves Motor Function over OnabotulinumtoxinA Alone in Post-Stroke Upper Limb Spasticity: A Single-Blind, Randomized Trial
title_sort rehabilitation plus onabotulinumtoxina improves motor function over onabotulinumtoxina alone in post-stroke upper limb spasticity: a single-blind, randomized trial
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5535163/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28696373
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/toxins9070216
work_keys_str_mv AT devierdeidre rehabilitationplusonabotulinumtoxinaimprovesmotorfunctionoveronabotulinumtoxinaaloneinpoststrokeupperlimbspasticityasingleblindrandomizedtrial
AT harnarjoann rehabilitationplusonabotulinumtoxinaimprovesmotorfunctionoveronabotulinumtoxinaaloneinpoststrokeupperlimbspasticityasingleblindrandomizedtrial
AT lopezleandro rehabilitationplusonabotulinumtoxinaimprovesmotorfunctionoveronabotulinumtoxinaaloneinpoststrokeupperlimbspasticityasingleblindrandomizedtrial
AT brashearallison rehabilitationplusonabotulinumtoxinaimprovesmotorfunctionoveronabotulinumtoxinaaloneinpoststrokeupperlimbspasticityasingleblindrandomizedtrial
AT grahamglenn rehabilitationplusonabotulinumtoxinaimprovesmotorfunctionoveronabotulinumtoxinaaloneinpoststrokeupperlimbspasticityasingleblindrandomizedtrial