Cargando…

Propofol versus Ketofol for Sedation of Pediatric Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Pulmonary Valve Implantation: A Double-blind Randomized Study

OBJECTIVE: The study was done to compare propofol and ketofol for sedation of pediatric patients scheduled for elective pulmonary valve implantation in a catheterization laboratory. DESIGN: This was a double-blind randomized study. SETTING: This study was conducted in Prince Sultan Cardiac Centre, S...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Soliman, Rabie, Mofeed, Mohammed, Momenah, Tarek
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5535572/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28701596
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aca.ACA_24_17
_version_ 1783253862365265920
author Soliman, Rabie
Mofeed, Mohammed
Momenah, Tarek
author_facet Soliman, Rabie
Mofeed, Mohammed
Momenah, Tarek
author_sort Soliman, Rabie
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The study was done to compare propofol and ketofol for sedation of pediatric patients scheduled for elective pulmonary valve implantation in a catheterization laboratory. DESIGN: This was a double-blind randomized study. SETTING: This study was conducted in Prince Sultan Cardiac Centre, Saudi Arabia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included 60 pediatric patients with pulmonary regurge undergoing pulmonary valve implantation. INTERVENTION: The study included sixty patients, classified into two groups (n = 30). Group A: Propofol was administered as a bolus dose (1–2 mg/kg) and then a continuous infusion of 50–100 μg/kg/min titrated as needed. Group B: Ketofol was administered 1–2 mg/kg and then infusion of 20–60 μg/kg/min. The medication was prepared by the nursing staff and given to anesthetist blindly. MEASUREMENTS: The monitors included heart rate, mean arterial blood pressure, respiratory rate, temperature, SPO(2) and PaCO(2), Michigan Sedation Score, fentanyl dose, antiemetic medications, and Aldrete score. MAIN RESULTS: The comparison of heart rate, mean arterial pressure, respiratory rate, temperature, SPO(2) and PaCO(2), Michigan Sedation Score, and Aldrete score were insignificant (P > 0.05). The total fentanyl increased in Group A more than Group B (P = 0.045). The required antiemetic drugs increased in Group A patients more than Group B (P = 0.020). The durations of full recovery and in the postanesthesia care unit were longer in Group A than Group B (P = 0.013, P < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: The use of propofol and ketofol is safe and effective for sedation of pediatric patients undergoing pulmonary valve implantation in a catheterization laboratory. However, ketofol has many advantages more than the propofol. Ketofol has a rapid onset of sedation, a rapid recovery time, decreased incidence of nausea and vomiting and leads to rapid discharge of patients from the postanesthesia care unit.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5535572
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55355722017-08-14 Propofol versus Ketofol for Sedation of Pediatric Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Pulmonary Valve Implantation: A Double-blind Randomized Study Soliman, Rabie Mofeed, Mohammed Momenah, Tarek Ann Card Anaesth Original Article OBJECTIVE: The study was done to compare propofol and ketofol for sedation of pediatric patients scheduled for elective pulmonary valve implantation in a catheterization laboratory. DESIGN: This was a double-blind randomized study. SETTING: This study was conducted in Prince Sultan Cardiac Centre, Saudi Arabia. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The study included 60 pediatric patients with pulmonary regurge undergoing pulmonary valve implantation. INTERVENTION: The study included sixty patients, classified into two groups (n = 30). Group A: Propofol was administered as a bolus dose (1–2 mg/kg) and then a continuous infusion of 50–100 μg/kg/min titrated as needed. Group B: Ketofol was administered 1–2 mg/kg and then infusion of 20–60 μg/kg/min. The medication was prepared by the nursing staff and given to anesthetist blindly. MEASUREMENTS: The monitors included heart rate, mean arterial blood pressure, respiratory rate, temperature, SPO(2) and PaCO(2), Michigan Sedation Score, fentanyl dose, antiemetic medications, and Aldrete score. MAIN RESULTS: The comparison of heart rate, mean arterial pressure, respiratory rate, temperature, SPO(2) and PaCO(2), Michigan Sedation Score, and Aldrete score were insignificant (P > 0.05). The total fentanyl increased in Group A more than Group B (P = 0.045). The required antiemetic drugs increased in Group A patients more than Group B (P = 0.020). The durations of full recovery and in the postanesthesia care unit were longer in Group A than Group B (P = 0.013, P < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSION: The use of propofol and ketofol is safe and effective for sedation of pediatric patients undergoing pulmonary valve implantation in a catheterization laboratory. However, ketofol has many advantages more than the propofol. Ketofol has a rapid onset of sedation, a rapid recovery time, decreased incidence of nausea and vomiting and leads to rapid discharge of patients from the postanesthesia care unit. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5535572/ /pubmed/28701596 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aca.ACA_24_17 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Annals of Cardiac Anaesthesia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as the author is credited and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Soliman, Rabie
Mofeed, Mohammed
Momenah, Tarek
Propofol versus Ketofol for Sedation of Pediatric Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Pulmonary Valve Implantation: A Double-blind Randomized Study
title Propofol versus Ketofol for Sedation of Pediatric Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Pulmonary Valve Implantation: A Double-blind Randomized Study
title_full Propofol versus Ketofol for Sedation of Pediatric Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Pulmonary Valve Implantation: A Double-blind Randomized Study
title_fullStr Propofol versus Ketofol for Sedation of Pediatric Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Pulmonary Valve Implantation: A Double-blind Randomized Study
title_full_unstemmed Propofol versus Ketofol for Sedation of Pediatric Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Pulmonary Valve Implantation: A Double-blind Randomized Study
title_short Propofol versus Ketofol for Sedation of Pediatric Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Pulmonary Valve Implantation: A Double-blind Randomized Study
title_sort propofol versus ketofol for sedation of pediatric patients undergoing transcatheter pulmonary valve implantation: a double-blind randomized study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5535572/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28701596
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/aca.ACA_24_17
work_keys_str_mv AT solimanrabie propofolversusketofolforsedationofpediatricpatientsundergoingtranscatheterpulmonaryvalveimplantationadoubleblindrandomizedstudy
AT mofeedmohammed propofolversusketofolforsedationofpediatricpatientsundergoingtranscatheterpulmonaryvalveimplantationadoubleblindrandomizedstudy
AT momenahtarek propofolversusketofolforsedationofpediatricpatientsundergoingtranscatheterpulmonaryvalveimplantationadoubleblindrandomizedstudy