Cargando…

Clinical Effects and Safety of Zhi Sou San for Cough: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials

INTRODUCTION: Zhi Sou San (ZSS), a traditional Chinese prescription, has been widely applied in treating cough. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ZSS for cough. METHODS: We searched relevant articles up to 5 March 2017 in seven electronic databases: th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cheng, Ningchang, Zhu, Jia, Ding, Pinpin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5536149/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28798807
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/9436352
_version_ 1783253971817725952
author Cheng, Ningchang
Zhu, Jia
Ding, Pinpin
author_facet Cheng, Ningchang
Zhu, Jia
Ding, Pinpin
author_sort Cheng, Ningchang
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Zhi Sou San (ZSS), a traditional Chinese prescription, has been widely applied in treating cough. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ZSS for cough. METHODS: We searched relevant articles up to 5 March 2017 in seven electronic databases: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, PubMed, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Cqvip Database (VIP), China Biology Medicine disc (CBM), and Wanfang Data. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were eligible, regardless of blinding. The primary outcome was the total effective rate. RESULTS: Forty-six RCTs with a total of 4007 participants were identified. Compared with western medicine, ZSS significantly improved the total effective rate (OR: 4.45; 95% CI: 3.62–5.47) and the pulmonary function in terms of FEV1 (OR: 0.35; 95% CI: 0.24–0.46) and decreased the adverse reactions (OR: 0.05; 95% CI: 0.02–0.01) and the recurrence rate (OR: 0.30; 95% CI: 0.16–0.57). However, there was no significant improvement in the cough symptom score comparing ZSS with western medicine. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis shows that ZSS has significant additional benefits and relative safety in treating cough. However, more rigorously designed investigations and studies, with large sample sizes, are needed because of the methodological flaws and low quality of the included trials in this meta-analysis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5536149
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55361492017-08-10 Clinical Effects and Safety of Zhi Sou San for Cough: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials Cheng, Ningchang Zhu, Jia Ding, Pinpin Evid Based Complement Alternat Med Review Article INTRODUCTION: Zhi Sou San (ZSS), a traditional Chinese prescription, has been widely applied in treating cough. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of ZSS for cough. METHODS: We searched relevant articles up to 5 March 2017 in seven electronic databases: the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, PubMed, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), Cqvip Database (VIP), China Biology Medicine disc (CBM), and Wanfang Data. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were eligible, regardless of blinding. The primary outcome was the total effective rate. RESULTS: Forty-six RCTs with a total of 4007 participants were identified. Compared with western medicine, ZSS significantly improved the total effective rate (OR: 4.45; 95% CI: 3.62–5.47) and the pulmonary function in terms of FEV1 (OR: 0.35; 95% CI: 0.24–0.46) and decreased the adverse reactions (OR: 0.05; 95% CI: 0.02–0.01) and the recurrence rate (OR: 0.30; 95% CI: 0.16–0.57). However, there was no significant improvement in the cough symptom score comparing ZSS with western medicine. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis shows that ZSS has significant additional benefits and relative safety in treating cough. However, more rigorously designed investigations and studies, with large sample sizes, are needed because of the methodological flaws and low quality of the included trials in this meta-analysis. Hindawi 2017 2017-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5536149/ /pubmed/28798807 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/9436352 Text en Copyright © 2017 Ningchang Cheng et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Cheng, Ningchang
Zhu, Jia
Ding, Pinpin
Clinical Effects and Safety of Zhi Sou San for Cough: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials
title Clinical Effects and Safety of Zhi Sou San for Cough: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials
title_full Clinical Effects and Safety of Zhi Sou San for Cough: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials
title_fullStr Clinical Effects and Safety of Zhi Sou San for Cough: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials
title_full_unstemmed Clinical Effects and Safety of Zhi Sou San for Cough: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials
title_short Clinical Effects and Safety of Zhi Sou San for Cough: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials
title_sort clinical effects and safety of zhi sou san for cough: a meta-analysis of randomized trials
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5536149/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28798807
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/9436352
work_keys_str_mv AT chengningchang clinicaleffectsandsafetyofzhisousanforcoughametaanalysisofrandomizedtrials
AT zhujia clinicaleffectsandsafetyofzhisousanforcoughametaanalysisofrandomizedtrials
AT dingpinpin clinicaleffectsandsafetyofzhisousanforcoughametaanalysisofrandomizedtrials