Cargando…

Objective Assessment of Listening Effort: Coregistration of Pupillometry and EEG

Listening to speech in noise is effortful, particularly for people with hearing impairment. While it is known that effort is related to a complex interplay between bottom-up and top-down processes, the cognitive and neurophysiological mechanisms contributing to effortful listening remain unknown. Th...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Miles, Kelly, McMahon, Catherine, Boisvert, Isabelle, Ibrahim, Ronny, de Lissa, Peter, Graham, Petra, Lyxell, Björn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5536372/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28752807
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2331216517706396
_version_ 1783254006813949952
author Miles, Kelly
McMahon, Catherine
Boisvert, Isabelle
Ibrahim, Ronny
de Lissa, Peter
Graham, Petra
Lyxell, Björn
author_facet Miles, Kelly
McMahon, Catherine
Boisvert, Isabelle
Ibrahim, Ronny
de Lissa, Peter
Graham, Petra
Lyxell, Björn
author_sort Miles, Kelly
collection PubMed
description Listening to speech in noise is effortful, particularly for people with hearing impairment. While it is known that effort is related to a complex interplay between bottom-up and top-down processes, the cognitive and neurophysiological mechanisms contributing to effortful listening remain unknown. Therefore, a reliable physiological measure to assess effort remains elusive. This study aimed to determine whether pupil dilation and alpha power change, two physiological measures suggested to index listening effort, assess similar processes. Listening effort was manipulated by parametrically varying spectral resolution (16- and 6-channel noise vocoding) and speech reception thresholds (SRT; 50% and 80%) while 19 young, normal-hearing adults performed a speech recognition task in noise. Results of off-line sentence scoring showed discrepancies between the target SRTs and the true performance obtained during the speech recognition task. For example, in the SRT80% condition, participants scored an average of 64.7%. Participants’ true performance levels were therefore used for subsequent statistical modelling. Results showed that both measures appeared to be sensitive to changes in spectral resolution (channel vocoding), while pupil dilation only was also significantly related to their true performance levels (%) and task accuracy (i.e., whether the response was correctly or partially recalled). The two measures were not correlated, suggesting they each may reflect different cognitive processes involved in listening effort. This combination of findings contributes to a growing body of research aiming to develop an objective measure of listening effort.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5536372
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55363722017-08-16 Objective Assessment of Listening Effort: Coregistration of Pupillometry and EEG Miles, Kelly McMahon, Catherine Boisvert, Isabelle Ibrahim, Ronny de Lissa, Peter Graham, Petra Lyxell, Björn Trends Hear Special Issue: Australian Hearing Hub Listening to speech in noise is effortful, particularly for people with hearing impairment. While it is known that effort is related to a complex interplay between bottom-up and top-down processes, the cognitive and neurophysiological mechanisms contributing to effortful listening remain unknown. Therefore, a reliable physiological measure to assess effort remains elusive. This study aimed to determine whether pupil dilation and alpha power change, two physiological measures suggested to index listening effort, assess similar processes. Listening effort was manipulated by parametrically varying spectral resolution (16- and 6-channel noise vocoding) and speech reception thresholds (SRT; 50% and 80%) while 19 young, normal-hearing adults performed a speech recognition task in noise. Results of off-line sentence scoring showed discrepancies between the target SRTs and the true performance obtained during the speech recognition task. For example, in the SRT80% condition, participants scored an average of 64.7%. Participants’ true performance levels were therefore used for subsequent statistical modelling. Results showed that both measures appeared to be sensitive to changes in spectral resolution (channel vocoding), while pupil dilation only was also significantly related to their true performance levels (%) and task accuracy (i.e., whether the response was correctly or partially recalled). The two measures were not correlated, suggesting they each may reflect different cognitive processes involved in listening effort. This combination of findings contributes to a growing body of research aiming to develop an objective measure of listening effort. SAGE Publications 2017-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5536372/ /pubmed/28752807 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2331216517706396 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Special Issue: Australian Hearing Hub
Miles, Kelly
McMahon, Catherine
Boisvert, Isabelle
Ibrahim, Ronny
de Lissa, Peter
Graham, Petra
Lyxell, Björn
Objective Assessment of Listening Effort: Coregistration of Pupillometry and EEG
title Objective Assessment of Listening Effort: Coregistration of Pupillometry and EEG
title_full Objective Assessment of Listening Effort: Coregistration of Pupillometry and EEG
title_fullStr Objective Assessment of Listening Effort: Coregistration of Pupillometry and EEG
title_full_unstemmed Objective Assessment of Listening Effort: Coregistration of Pupillometry and EEG
title_short Objective Assessment of Listening Effort: Coregistration of Pupillometry and EEG
title_sort objective assessment of listening effort: coregistration of pupillometry and eeg
topic Special Issue: Australian Hearing Hub
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5536372/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28752807
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2331216517706396
work_keys_str_mv AT mileskelly objectiveassessmentoflisteningeffortcoregistrationofpupillometryandeeg
AT mcmahoncatherine objectiveassessmentoflisteningeffortcoregistrationofpupillometryandeeg
AT boisvertisabelle objectiveassessmentoflisteningeffortcoregistrationofpupillometryandeeg
AT ibrahimronny objectiveassessmentoflisteningeffortcoregistrationofpupillometryandeeg
AT delissapeter objectiveassessmentoflisteningeffortcoregistrationofpupillometryandeeg
AT grahampetra objectiveassessmentoflisteningeffortcoregistrationofpupillometryandeeg
AT lyxellbjorn objectiveassessmentoflisteningeffortcoregistrationofpupillometryandeeg