Cargando…
Objective Assessment of Listening Effort: Coregistration of Pupillometry and EEG
Listening to speech in noise is effortful, particularly for people with hearing impairment. While it is known that effort is related to a complex interplay between bottom-up and top-down processes, the cognitive and neurophysiological mechanisms contributing to effortful listening remain unknown. Th...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5536372/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28752807 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2331216517706396 |
_version_ | 1783254006813949952 |
---|---|
author | Miles, Kelly McMahon, Catherine Boisvert, Isabelle Ibrahim, Ronny de Lissa, Peter Graham, Petra Lyxell, Björn |
author_facet | Miles, Kelly McMahon, Catherine Boisvert, Isabelle Ibrahim, Ronny de Lissa, Peter Graham, Petra Lyxell, Björn |
author_sort | Miles, Kelly |
collection | PubMed |
description | Listening to speech in noise is effortful, particularly for people with hearing impairment. While it is known that effort is related to a complex interplay between bottom-up and top-down processes, the cognitive and neurophysiological mechanisms contributing to effortful listening remain unknown. Therefore, a reliable physiological measure to assess effort remains elusive. This study aimed to determine whether pupil dilation and alpha power change, two physiological measures suggested to index listening effort, assess similar processes. Listening effort was manipulated by parametrically varying spectral resolution (16- and 6-channel noise vocoding) and speech reception thresholds (SRT; 50% and 80%) while 19 young, normal-hearing adults performed a speech recognition task in noise. Results of off-line sentence scoring showed discrepancies between the target SRTs and the true performance obtained during the speech recognition task. For example, in the SRT80% condition, participants scored an average of 64.7%. Participants’ true performance levels were therefore used for subsequent statistical modelling. Results showed that both measures appeared to be sensitive to changes in spectral resolution (channel vocoding), while pupil dilation only was also significantly related to their true performance levels (%) and task accuracy (i.e., whether the response was correctly or partially recalled). The two measures were not correlated, suggesting they each may reflect different cognitive processes involved in listening effort. This combination of findings contributes to a growing body of research aiming to develop an objective measure of listening effort. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5536372 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55363722017-08-16 Objective Assessment of Listening Effort: Coregistration of Pupillometry and EEG Miles, Kelly McMahon, Catherine Boisvert, Isabelle Ibrahim, Ronny de Lissa, Peter Graham, Petra Lyxell, Björn Trends Hear Special Issue: Australian Hearing Hub Listening to speech in noise is effortful, particularly for people with hearing impairment. While it is known that effort is related to a complex interplay between bottom-up and top-down processes, the cognitive and neurophysiological mechanisms contributing to effortful listening remain unknown. Therefore, a reliable physiological measure to assess effort remains elusive. This study aimed to determine whether pupil dilation and alpha power change, two physiological measures suggested to index listening effort, assess similar processes. Listening effort was manipulated by parametrically varying spectral resolution (16- and 6-channel noise vocoding) and speech reception thresholds (SRT; 50% and 80%) while 19 young, normal-hearing adults performed a speech recognition task in noise. Results of off-line sentence scoring showed discrepancies between the target SRTs and the true performance obtained during the speech recognition task. For example, in the SRT80% condition, participants scored an average of 64.7%. Participants’ true performance levels were therefore used for subsequent statistical modelling. Results showed that both measures appeared to be sensitive to changes in spectral resolution (channel vocoding), while pupil dilation only was also significantly related to their true performance levels (%) and task accuracy (i.e., whether the response was correctly or partially recalled). The two measures were not correlated, suggesting they each may reflect different cognitive processes involved in listening effort. This combination of findings contributes to a growing body of research aiming to develop an objective measure of listening effort. SAGE Publications 2017-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5536372/ /pubmed/28752807 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2331216517706396 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Special Issue: Australian Hearing Hub Miles, Kelly McMahon, Catherine Boisvert, Isabelle Ibrahim, Ronny de Lissa, Peter Graham, Petra Lyxell, Björn Objective Assessment of Listening Effort: Coregistration of Pupillometry and EEG |
title | Objective Assessment of Listening Effort: Coregistration of Pupillometry and EEG |
title_full | Objective Assessment of Listening Effort: Coregistration of Pupillometry and EEG |
title_fullStr | Objective Assessment of Listening Effort: Coregistration of Pupillometry and EEG |
title_full_unstemmed | Objective Assessment of Listening Effort: Coregistration of Pupillometry and EEG |
title_short | Objective Assessment of Listening Effort: Coregistration of Pupillometry and EEG |
title_sort | objective assessment of listening effort: coregistration of pupillometry and eeg |
topic | Special Issue: Australian Hearing Hub |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5536372/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28752807 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2331216517706396 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mileskelly objectiveassessmentoflisteningeffortcoregistrationofpupillometryandeeg AT mcmahoncatherine objectiveassessmentoflisteningeffortcoregistrationofpupillometryandeeg AT boisvertisabelle objectiveassessmentoflisteningeffortcoregistrationofpupillometryandeeg AT ibrahimronny objectiveassessmentoflisteningeffortcoregistrationofpupillometryandeeg AT delissapeter objectiveassessmentoflisteningeffortcoregistrationofpupillometryandeeg AT grahampetra objectiveassessmentoflisteningeffortcoregistrationofpupillometryandeeg AT lyxellbjorn objectiveassessmentoflisteningeffortcoregistrationofpupillometryandeeg |