Cargando…
Sevoflurane at 1.0 MAC together with remifentanil and propofol produces clinically acceptable intubation conditions at the vocal cords: A prospective randomized study
OBJECTIVE: The overall intubation conditions after tracheal intubation with remifentanil, propofol, and sevoflurane at 1.0 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) are worse than with rocuronium at 0.45 mg/kg. Therefore, we compared the intubation conditions and laryngeal morbidity (vocal cord injuries,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5536408/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28449630 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060517701355 |
_version_ | 1783254015336775680 |
---|---|
author | Ovari, Attila Bicker, Ilona Machmueller, Susann Schuldt, Tobias Sauer, Martin Soltesz, Stefan Noeldge-Schomburg, Gabriele Mlynski, Robert Mencke, Thomas |
author_facet | Ovari, Attila Bicker, Ilona Machmueller, Susann Schuldt, Tobias Sauer, Martin Soltesz, Stefan Noeldge-Schomburg, Gabriele Mlynski, Robert Mencke, Thomas |
author_sort | Ovari, Attila |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The overall intubation conditions after tracheal intubation with remifentanil, propofol, and sevoflurane at 1.0 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) are worse than with rocuronium at 0.45 mg/kg. Therefore, we compared the intubation conditions and laryngeal morbidity (vocal cord injuries, hoarseness, and sore throat) with sevoflurane at 1.2 and 1.4 MAC versus 1.0 MAC. METHODS: In this prospective clinical trial, 90 patients were randomized to 3 groups: the sevoflurane 1.0, 1.2, and 1.4 MAC groups. At 3 min, tracheal intubation was performed and the patients’ intubation conditions were assessed. The vocal cords were examined for injury by videolaryngoscopy. Additionally, the incidence and severity of laryngeal morbidity were compared between women and men. RESULTS: Acceptable intubation conditions were seen in 72% of the patients without significant differences between the groups. Overall, vocal cord injuries (oedema) occurred in three (4%) patients. Women reported sore throat more often than men (51% vs. 21%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Intubation conditions were not improved with higher sevoflurane concentrations. The incidence and severity of sore throat were greater in women than men. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.Gov: NCT 01896245 |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5536408 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55364082017-10-03 Sevoflurane at 1.0 MAC together with remifentanil and propofol produces clinically acceptable intubation conditions at the vocal cords: A prospective randomized study Ovari, Attila Bicker, Ilona Machmueller, Susann Schuldt, Tobias Sauer, Martin Soltesz, Stefan Noeldge-Schomburg, Gabriele Mlynski, Robert Mencke, Thomas J Int Med Res Clinical Reports OBJECTIVE: The overall intubation conditions after tracheal intubation with remifentanil, propofol, and sevoflurane at 1.0 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) are worse than with rocuronium at 0.45 mg/kg. Therefore, we compared the intubation conditions and laryngeal morbidity (vocal cord injuries, hoarseness, and sore throat) with sevoflurane at 1.2 and 1.4 MAC versus 1.0 MAC. METHODS: In this prospective clinical trial, 90 patients were randomized to 3 groups: the sevoflurane 1.0, 1.2, and 1.4 MAC groups. At 3 min, tracheal intubation was performed and the patients’ intubation conditions were assessed. The vocal cords were examined for injury by videolaryngoscopy. Additionally, the incidence and severity of laryngeal morbidity were compared between women and men. RESULTS: Acceptable intubation conditions were seen in 72% of the patients without significant differences between the groups. Overall, vocal cord injuries (oedema) occurred in three (4%) patients. Women reported sore throat more often than men (51% vs. 21%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Intubation conditions were not improved with higher sevoflurane concentrations. The incidence and severity of sore throat were greater in women than men. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.Gov: NCT 01896245 SAGE Publications 2017-04-28 2017-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5536408/ /pubmed/28449630 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060517701355 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page(https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Clinical Reports Ovari, Attila Bicker, Ilona Machmueller, Susann Schuldt, Tobias Sauer, Martin Soltesz, Stefan Noeldge-Schomburg, Gabriele Mlynski, Robert Mencke, Thomas Sevoflurane at 1.0 MAC together with remifentanil and propofol produces clinically acceptable intubation conditions at the vocal cords: A prospective randomized study |
title | Sevoflurane at 1.0 MAC together with remifentanil and propofol produces clinically acceptable intubation conditions at the vocal cords: A prospective randomized study |
title_full | Sevoflurane at 1.0 MAC together with remifentanil and propofol produces clinically acceptable intubation conditions at the vocal cords: A prospective randomized study |
title_fullStr | Sevoflurane at 1.0 MAC together with remifentanil and propofol produces clinically acceptable intubation conditions at the vocal cords: A prospective randomized study |
title_full_unstemmed | Sevoflurane at 1.0 MAC together with remifentanil and propofol produces clinically acceptable intubation conditions at the vocal cords: A prospective randomized study |
title_short | Sevoflurane at 1.0 MAC together with remifentanil and propofol produces clinically acceptable intubation conditions at the vocal cords: A prospective randomized study |
title_sort | sevoflurane at 1.0 mac together with remifentanil and propofol produces clinically acceptable intubation conditions at the vocal cords: a prospective randomized study |
topic | Clinical Reports |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5536408/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28449630 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060517701355 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ovariattila sevofluraneat10mactogetherwithremifentanilandpropofolproducesclinicallyacceptableintubationconditionsatthevocalcordsaprospectiverandomizedstudy AT bickerilona sevofluraneat10mactogetherwithremifentanilandpropofolproducesclinicallyacceptableintubationconditionsatthevocalcordsaprospectiverandomizedstudy AT machmuellersusann sevofluraneat10mactogetherwithremifentanilandpropofolproducesclinicallyacceptableintubationconditionsatthevocalcordsaprospectiverandomizedstudy AT schuldttobias sevofluraneat10mactogetherwithremifentanilandpropofolproducesclinicallyacceptableintubationconditionsatthevocalcordsaprospectiverandomizedstudy AT sauermartin sevofluraneat10mactogetherwithremifentanilandpropofolproducesclinicallyacceptableintubationconditionsatthevocalcordsaprospectiverandomizedstudy AT solteszstefan sevofluraneat10mactogetherwithremifentanilandpropofolproducesclinicallyacceptableintubationconditionsatthevocalcordsaprospectiverandomizedstudy AT noeldgeschomburggabriele sevofluraneat10mactogetherwithremifentanilandpropofolproducesclinicallyacceptableintubationconditionsatthevocalcordsaprospectiverandomizedstudy AT mlynskirobert sevofluraneat10mactogetherwithremifentanilandpropofolproducesclinicallyacceptableintubationconditionsatthevocalcordsaprospectiverandomizedstudy AT menckethomas sevofluraneat10mactogetherwithremifentanilandpropofolproducesclinicallyacceptableintubationconditionsatthevocalcordsaprospectiverandomizedstudy |