Cargando…

Sevoflurane at 1.0 MAC together with remifentanil and propofol produces clinically acceptable intubation conditions at the vocal cords: A prospective randomized study

OBJECTIVE: The overall intubation conditions after tracheal intubation with remifentanil, propofol, and sevoflurane at 1.0 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) are worse than with rocuronium at 0.45 mg/kg. Therefore, we compared the intubation conditions and laryngeal morbidity (vocal cord injuries,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ovari, Attila, Bicker, Ilona, Machmueller, Susann, Schuldt, Tobias, Sauer, Martin, Soltesz, Stefan, Noeldge-Schomburg, Gabriele, Mlynski, Robert, Mencke, Thomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5536408/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28449630
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060517701355
_version_ 1783254015336775680
author Ovari, Attila
Bicker, Ilona
Machmueller, Susann
Schuldt, Tobias
Sauer, Martin
Soltesz, Stefan
Noeldge-Schomburg, Gabriele
Mlynski, Robert
Mencke, Thomas
author_facet Ovari, Attila
Bicker, Ilona
Machmueller, Susann
Schuldt, Tobias
Sauer, Martin
Soltesz, Stefan
Noeldge-Schomburg, Gabriele
Mlynski, Robert
Mencke, Thomas
author_sort Ovari, Attila
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: The overall intubation conditions after tracheal intubation with remifentanil, propofol, and sevoflurane at 1.0 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) are worse than with rocuronium at 0.45 mg/kg. Therefore, we compared the intubation conditions and laryngeal morbidity (vocal cord injuries, hoarseness, and sore throat) with sevoflurane at 1.2 and 1.4 MAC versus 1.0 MAC. METHODS: In this prospective clinical trial, 90 patients were randomized to 3 groups: the sevoflurane 1.0, 1.2, and 1.4 MAC groups. At 3 min, tracheal intubation was performed and the patients’ intubation conditions were assessed. The vocal cords were examined for injury by videolaryngoscopy. Additionally, the incidence and severity of laryngeal morbidity were compared between women and men. RESULTS: Acceptable intubation conditions were seen in 72% of the patients without significant differences between the groups. Overall, vocal cord injuries (oedema) occurred in three (4%) patients. Women reported sore throat more often than men (51% vs. 21%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Intubation conditions were not improved with higher sevoflurane concentrations. The incidence and severity of sore throat were greater in women than men. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.Gov: NCT 01896245
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5536408
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55364082017-10-03 Sevoflurane at 1.0 MAC together with remifentanil and propofol produces clinically acceptable intubation conditions at the vocal cords: A prospective randomized study Ovari, Attila Bicker, Ilona Machmueller, Susann Schuldt, Tobias Sauer, Martin Soltesz, Stefan Noeldge-Schomburg, Gabriele Mlynski, Robert Mencke, Thomas J Int Med Res Clinical Reports OBJECTIVE: The overall intubation conditions after tracheal intubation with remifentanil, propofol, and sevoflurane at 1.0 minimum alveolar concentration (MAC) are worse than with rocuronium at 0.45 mg/kg. Therefore, we compared the intubation conditions and laryngeal morbidity (vocal cord injuries, hoarseness, and sore throat) with sevoflurane at 1.2 and 1.4 MAC versus 1.0 MAC. METHODS: In this prospective clinical trial, 90 patients were randomized to 3 groups: the sevoflurane 1.0, 1.2, and 1.4 MAC groups. At 3 min, tracheal intubation was performed and the patients’ intubation conditions were assessed. The vocal cords were examined for injury by videolaryngoscopy. Additionally, the incidence and severity of laryngeal morbidity were compared between women and men. RESULTS: Acceptable intubation conditions were seen in 72% of the patients without significant differences between the groups. Overall, vocal cord injuries (oedema) occurred in three (4%) patients. Women reported sore throat more often than men (51% vs. 21%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Intubation conditions were not improved with higher sevoflurane concentrations. The incidence and severity of sore throat were greater in women than men. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.Gov: NCT 01896245 SAGE Publications 2017-04-28 2017-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5536408/ /pubmed/28449630 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060517701355 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page(https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Clinical Reports
Ovari, Attila
Bicker, Ilona
Machmueller, Susann
Schuldt, Tobias
Sauer, Martin
Soltesz, Stefan
Noeldge-Schomburg, Gabriele
Mlynski, Robert
Mencke, Thomas
Sevoflurane at 1.0 MAC together with remifentanil and propofol produces clinically acceptable intubation conditions at the vocal cords: A prospective randomized study
title Sevoflurane at 1.0 MAC together with remifentanil and propofol produces clinically acceptable intubation conditions at the vocal cords: A prospective randomized study
title_full Sevoflurane at 1.0 MAC together with remifentanil and propofol produces clinically acceptable intubation conditions at the vocal cords: A prospective randomized study
title_fullStr Sevoflurane at 1.0 MAC together with remifentanil and propofol produces clinically acceptable intubation conditions at the vocal cords: A prospective randomized study
title_full_unstemmed Sevoflurane at 1.0 MAC together with remifentanil and propofol produces clinically acceptable intubation conditions at the vocal cords: A prospective randomized study
title_short Sevoflurane at 1.0 MAC together with remifentanil and propofol produces clinically acceptable intubation conditions at the vocal cords: A prospective randomized study
title_sort sevoflurane at 1.0 mac together with remifentanil and propofol produces clinically acceptable intubation conditions at the vocal cords: a prospective randomized study
topic Clinical Reports
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5536408/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28449630
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060517701355
work_keys_str_mv AT ovariattila sevofluraneat10mactogetherwithremifentanilandpropofolproducesclinicallyacceptableintubationconditionsatthevocalcordsaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT bickerilona sevofluraneat10mactogetherwithremifentanilandpropofolproducesclinicallyacceptableintubationconditionsatthevocalcordsaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT machmuellersusann sevofluraneat10mactogetherwithremifentanilandpropofolproducesclinicallyacceptableintubationconditionsatthevocalcordsaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT schuldttobias sevofluraneat10mactogetherwithremifentanilandpropofolproducesclinicallyacceptableintubationconditionsatthevocalcordsaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT sauermartin sevofluraneat10mactogetherwithremifentanilandpropofolproducesclinicallyacceptableintubationconditionsatthevocalcordsaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT solteszstefan sevofluraneat10mactogetherwithremifentanilandpropofolproducesclinicallyacceptableintubationconditionsatthevocalcordsaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT noeldgeschomburggabriele sevofluraneat10mactogetherwithremifentanilandpropofolproducesclinicallyacceptableintubationconditionsatthevocalcordsaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT mlynskirobert sevofluraneat10mactogetherwithremifentanilandpropofolproducesclinicallyacceptableintubationconditionsatthevocalcordsaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT menckethomas sevofluraneat10mactogetherwithremifentanilandpropofolproducesclinicallyacceptableintubationconditionsatthevocalcordsaprospectiverandomizedstudy