Cargando…

Pregnancy outcome of laparoscopic tubal reanastomosis: retrospective results from a single clinical centre

OBJECTIVE: Tubal sterilization is a widespread method of contraception. Post-sterilization regret is encountered, despite careful consideration prior to the procedure. Two treatment options are available for women after having had tubal sterilization: microsurgical reversal and IVF treatment. Recent...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Karayalcin, Rana, Ozcan, Sarp, Tokmak, Aytekin, Gürlek, Beril, Yenicesu, Okan, Timur, Hakan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5536424/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28534697
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060517709815
_version_ 1783254019086483456
author Karayalcin, Rana
Ozcan, Sarp
Tokmak, Aytekin
Gürlek, Beril
Yenicesu, Okan
Timur, Hakan
author_facet Karayalcin, Rana
Ozcan, Sarp
Tokmak, Aytekin
Gürlek, Beril
Yenicesu, Okan
Timur, Hakan
author_sort Karayalcin, Rana
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: Tubal sterilization is a widespread method of contraception. Post-sterilization regret is encountered, despite careful consideration prior to the procedure. Two treatment options are available for women after having had tubal sterilization: microsurgical reversal and IVF treatment. Recent improvements in laparoscopy have allowed tubal reanastomosis to be performed. This study aimed to evaluate the reproductive outcome after laparoscopic tubal reanastomosis and surgical features of the patients. METHODS: From June 2007 to January 2010, 27 patients with bilateral tubal ligation who underwent laparoscopic tubal reanastomosis were evaluated retrospectively. Tubal sterilization was performed by Pomeroy’s technique during caesarean section in all of the patients. Before surgery, all of the patients were evaluated for possible other causes of infertility and the results of the evaluation were normal. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 31.8 years (range, 27–38 years). The mean interval between sterilization and reversal was 5.1 years (range, 1–14 years). Bilateral reversal was achieved in 24 patients. The operation time ranged from 85 to 140 minutes with a mean time of 105 minutes. All of the patients were discharged on the next day. There were no postoperative complications. Overall pregnancy, intrauterine pregnancy, and ectopic pregnancy rates were 55.5% (15/27), 51.8% (14/27), and 3.7% (1/27), respectively. Of the 14 intrauterine pregnancies, one ended with abortion at 6 weeks’ gestation (1/14). The mean interval from surgery to pregnancy was 270 days (range, 147–420 days). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic tubal reanastomosis has the advantages of fewer complications, less postoperative discomfort, a smaller incisional scar, a shorter recovery time, and earlier resumption of normal activities. This technique has a satisfactory pregnancy rate in selected patients who desire reversal of tubal sterilization.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5536424
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55364242017-10-03 Pregnancy outcome of laparoscopic tubal reanastomosis: retrospective results from a single clinical centre Karayalcin, Rana Ozcan, Sarp Tokmak, Aytekin Gürlek, Beril Yenicesu, Okan Timur, Hakan J Int Med Res Clinical Reports OBJECTIVE: Tubal sterilization is a widespread method of contraception. Post-sterilization regret is encountered, despite careful consideration prior to the procedure. Two treatment options are available for women after having had tubal sterilization: microsurgical reversal and IVF treatment. Recent improvements in laparoscopy have allowed tubal reanastomosis to be performed. This study aimed to evaluate the reproductive outcome after laparoscopic tubal reanastomosis and surgical features of the patients. METHODS: From June 2007 to January 2010, 27 patients with bilateral tubal ligation who underwent laparoscopic tubal reanastomosis were evaluated retrospectively. Tubal sterilization was performed by Pomeroy’s technique during caesarean section in all of the patients. Before surgery, all of the patients were evaluated for possible other causes of infertility and the results of the evaluation were normal. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 31.8 years (range, 27–38 years). The mean interval between sterilization and reversal was 5.1 years (range, 1–14 years). Bilateral reversal was achieved in 24 patients. The operation time ranged from 85 to 140 minutes with a mean time of 105 minutes. All of the patients were discharged on the next day. There were no postoperative complications. Overall pregnancy, intrauterine pregnancy, and ectopic pregnancy rates were 55.5% (15/27), 51.8% (14/27), and 3.7% (1/27), respectively. Of the 14 intrauterine pregnancies, one ended with abortion at 6 weeks’ gestation (1/14). The mean interval from surgery to pregnancy was 270 days (range, 147–420 days). CONCLUSION: Laparoscopic tubal reanastomosis has the advantages of fewer complications, less postoperative discomfort, a smaller incisional scar, a shorter recovery time, and earlier resumption of normal activities. This technique has a satisfactory pregnancy rate in selected patients who desire reversal of tubal sterilization. SAGE Publications 2017-05-23 2017-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5536424/ /pubmed/28534697 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060517709815 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (http://www.creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access page(https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Clinical Reports
Karayalcin, Rana
Ozcan, Sarp
Tokmak, Aytekin
Gürlek, Beril
Yenicesu, Okan
Timur, Hakan
Pregnancy outcome of laparoscopic tubal reanastomosis: retrospective results from a single clinical centre
title Pregnancy outcome of laparoscopic tubal reanastomosis: retrospective results from a single clinical centre
title_full Pregnancy outcome of laparoscopic tubal reanastomosis: retrospective results from a single clinical centre
title_fullStr Pregnancy outcome of laparoscopic tubal reanastomosis: retrospective results from a single clinical centre
title_full_unstemmed Pregnancy outcome of laparoscopic tubal reanastomosis: retrospective results from a single clinical centre
title_short Pregnancy outcome of laparoscopic tubal reanastomosis: retrospective results from a single clinical centre
title_sort pregnancy outcome of laparoscopic tubal reanastomosis: retrospective results from a single clinical centre
topic Clinical Reports
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5536424/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28534697
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060517709815
work_keys_str_mv AT karayalcinrana pregnancyoutcomeoflaparoscopictubalreanastomosisretrospectiveresultsfromasingleclinicalcentre
AT ozcansarp pregnancyoutcomeoflaparoscopictubalreanastomosisretrospectiveresultsfromasingleclinicalcentre
AT tokmakaytekin pregnancyoutcomeoflaparoscopictubalreanastomosisretrospectiveresultsfromasingleclinicalcentre
AT gurlekberil pregnancyoutcomeoflaparoscopictubalreanastomosisretrospectiveresultsfromasingleclinicalcentre
AT yenicesuokan pregnancyoutcomeoflaparoscopictubalreanastomosisretrospectiveresultsfromasingleclinicalcentre
AT timurhakan pregnancyoutcomeoflaparoscopictubalreanastomosisretrospectiveresultsfromasingleclinicalcentre