Cargando…
Evaluation of the anticoagulant effect and timing of the concomitant use of S-1 and warfarin
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of the timing of warfarin (WF) administration in patients with gastric cancer who received S-1 oral chemotherapy. METHODS: This retrospective chart review collected patient data including the prothrombin time international normalized ratio (PT-INR). Patients were...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2016
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5536547/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27553806 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060516658162 |
Sumario: | OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of the timing of warfarin (WF) administration in patients with gastric cancer who received S-1 oral chemotherapy. METHODS: This retrospective chart review collected patient data including the prothrombin time international normalized ratio (PT-INR). Patients were categorized into three groups based on the timing of WF administration in relation to S-1 oral chemotherapy: group A patients received WF before S-1 chemotherapy; group B patients started WF during S-1 chemotherapy; and group C patients started WF after completing S-1 chemotherapy. RESULTS: A total of 21 patients with gastric cancer were included in the study; group A (n = 8), group B (n = 10) and group C (n = 3). Seven patients (88%) in group A, seven (70%) in group B and all of the patients (100%) in group C had >2.5 PT-INR. There was no significant difference in the time-to-exceed 2.5 PT-INR between groups A and B. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that the timing of WF use in relation to S-1 chemotherapy might not be an important factor for PT-INR, although the low patient numbers included in the study should be taken into consideration. |
---|