Cargando…

Fixation of distal radial epiphyseal fracture: Comparison of K-wire and prebent intramedullary nail

OBJECTIVE: To compare the use of crossed K-wire and prebent intramedullary nail techniques for the fixation of distal radius metaphyseal fracture in children. METHODS: Intraoperative and follow-up data for children with distal radius metaphyseal fracture, treated using crossed K-wire or prebent intr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cai, Haoqi, Wang, Zhigang, Cai, Haiqing
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2016
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5536569/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26912586
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0300060514566650
Descripción
Sumario:OBJECTIVE: To compare the use of crossed K-wire and prebent intramedullary nail techniques for the fixation of distal radius metaphyseal fracture in children. METHODS: Intraoperative and follow-up data for children with distal radius metaphyseal fracture, treated using crossed K-wire or prebent intramedullary nail fixation, were retrospectively analysed. Patient groups were matched for age, sex and clinical parameters (fracture location, affected side, fracture type). RESULTS: Patients treated using prebent intramedullary nail fixation (n = 52) had significantly shorter surgery duration, fewer intraoperative X-radiographs, and lower prevalence of postoperative redisplacement and malalignment deformity than those treated using crossed K-wire fixation (n = 52). Both techniques resulted in similar postoperative complications and recovery of forearm rotation. CONCLUSIONS: Prebent intramedullary nail fixation has a better functional outcome than crossed K-wire fixation in the treatment of distal radial epiphyseal fracture in children.