Cargando…

Structural flexibility of human α‐dystroglycan

Dystroglycan (DG), composed of α and β subunits, belongs to the dystrophin‐associated glycoprotein complex. α‐DG is an extracellular matrix protein that undergoes a complex post‐translational glycosylation process. The bifunctional glycosyltransferase like‐acetylglucosaminyltransferase (LARGE) plays...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Covaceuszach, Sonia, Bozzi, Manuela, Bigotti, Maria Giulia, Sciandra, Francesca, Konarev, Petr Valeryevich, Brancaccio, Andrea, Cassetta, Alberto
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5537065/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28781947
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2211-5463.12259
_version_ 1783254100143505408
author Covaceuszach, Sonia
Bozzi, Manuela
Bigotti, Maria Giulia
Sciandra, Francesca
Konarev, Petr Valeryevich
Brancaccio, Andrea
Cassetta, Alberto
author_facet Covaceuszach, Sonia
Bozzi, Manuela
Bigotti, Maria Giulia
Sciandra, Francesca
Konarev, Petr Valeryevich
Brancaccio, Andrea
Cassetta, Alberto
author_sort Covaceuszach, Sonia
collection PubMed
description Dystroglycan (DG), composed of α and β subunits, belongs to the dystrophin‐associated glycoprotein complex. α‐DG is an extracellular matrix protein that undergoes a complex post‐translational glycosylation process. The bifunctional glycosyltransferase like‐acetylglucosaminyltransferase (LARGE) plays a crucial role in the maturation of α‐DG, enabling its binding to laminin. We have already structurally analyzed the N‐terminal region of murine α‐DG (α‐DG‐Nt) and of a pathological single point mutant that may affect recognition of LARGE, although the structural features of the potential interaction between LARGE and DG remain elusive. We now report on the crystal structure of the wild‐type human α‐DG‐Nt that has allowed us to assess the reliability of our murine crystallographic structure as a α‐DG‐Nt general model. Moreover, we address for the first time both structures in solution. Interestingly, small‐angle X‐ray scattering (SAXS) reveals the existence of two main protein conformations ensembles. The predominant species is reminiscent of the crystal structure, while the less populated one assumes a more extended fold. A comparative analysis of the human and murine α‐DG‐Nt solution structures reveals that the two proteins share a common interdomain flexibility and population distribution of the two conformers. This is confirmed by the very similar stability displayed by the two orthologs as assessed by biochemical and biophysical experiments. These results highlight the need to take into account the molecular plasticity of α‐DG‐Nt in solution, as it can play an important role in the functional interactions with other binding partners.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5537065
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55370652017-08-04 Structural flexibility of human α‐dystroglycan Covaceuszach, Sonia Bozzi, Manuela Bigotti, Maria Giulia Sciandra, Francesca Konarev, Petr Valeryevich Brancaccio, Andrea Cassetta, Alberto FEBS Open Bio Research Articles Dystroglycan (DG), composed of α and β subunits, belongs to the dystrophin‐associated glycoprotein complex. α‐DG is an extracellular matrix protein that undergoes a complex post‐translational glycosylation process. The bifunctional glycosyltransferase like‐acetylglucosaminyltransferase (LARGE) plays a crucial role in the maturation of α‐DG, enabling its binding to laminin. We have already structurally analyzed the N‐terminal region of murine α‐DG (α‐DG‐Nt) and of a pathological single point mutant that may affect recognition of LARGE, although the structural features of the potential interaction between LARGE and DG remain elusive. We now report on the crystal structure of the wild‐type human α‐DG‐Nt that has allowed us to assess the reliability of our murine crystallographic structure as a α‐DG‐Nt general model. Moreover, we address for the first time both structures in solution. Interestingly, small‐angle X‐ray scattering (SAXS) reveals the existence of two main protein conformations ensembles. The predominant species is reminiscent of the crystal structure, while the less populated one assumes a more extended fold. A comparative analysis of the human and murine α‐DG‐Nt solution structures reveals that the two proteins share a common interdomain flexibility and population distribution of the two conformers. This is confirmed by the very similar stability displayed by the two orthologs as assessed by biochemical and biophysical experiments. These results highlight the need to take into account the molecular plasticity of α‐DG‐Nt in solution, as it can play an important role in the functional interactions with other binding partners. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-07-17 /pmc/articles/PMC5537065/ /pubmed/28781947 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2211-5463.12259 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Published by FEBS Press and John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Articles
Covaceuszach, Sonia
Bozzi, Manuela
Bigotti, Maria Giulia
Sciandra, Francesca
Konarev, Petr Valeryevich
Brancaccio, Andrea
Cassetta, Alberto
Structural flexibility of human α‐dystroglycan
title Structural flexibility of human α‐dystroglycan
title_full Structural flexibility of human α‐dystroglycan
title_fullStr Structural flexibility of human α‐dystroglycan
title_full_unstemmed Structural flexibility of human α‐dystroglycan
title_short Structural flexibility of human α‐dystroglycan
title_sort structural flexibility of human α‐dystroglycan
topic Research Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5537065/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28781947
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/2211-5463.12259
work_keys_str_mv AT covaceuszachsonia structuralflexibilityofhumanadystroglycan
AT bozzimanuela structuralflexibilityofhumanadystroglycan
AT bigottimariagiulia structuralflexibilityofhumanadystroglycan
AT sciandrafrancesca structuralflexibilityofhumanadystroglycan
AT konarevpetrvaleryevich structuralflexibilityofhumanadystroglycan
AT brancaccioandrea structuralflexibilityofhumanadystroglycan
AT cassettaalberto structuralflexibilityofhumanadystroglycan