Cargando…

Barrett’s oesophagus: Current controversies

Oesophageal adenocarcinoma is rapidly increasing in Western countries. This tumour frequently presents late in its course with metastatic disease and has a very poor prognosis. Barrett’s oesophagus is an acquired condition whereby the native squamous mucosa of the lower oesophagus is replaced by col...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Amadi, Chidi, Gatenby, Piers
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5537175/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28811703
http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i28.5051
_version_ 1783254116751900672
author Amadi, Chidi
Gatenby, Piers
author_facet Amadi, Chidi
Gatenby, Piers
author_sort Amadi, Chidi
collection PubMed
description Oesophageal adenocarcinoma is rapidly increasing in Western countries. This tumour frequently presents late in its course with metastatic disease and has a very poor prognosis. Barrett’s oesophagus is an acquired condition whereby the native squamous mucosa of the lower oesophagus is replaced by columnar epithelium following prolonged gastro-oesophageal reflux and is the recognised precursor lesion for oesophageal adenocarcinoma. There are multiple national and society guidelines regarding screening, surveillance and management of Barrett’s oesophagus, however all are limited regarding a clear evidence base for a well-demonstrated benefit and cost-effectiveness of surveillance, and robust risk stratification for patients to best use resources. Currently the accepted risk factors upon which surveillance intervals and interventions are based are Barrett’s segment length and histological interpretation of the systematic biopsies. Further patient risk factors including other demographic features, smoking, gender, obesity, ethnicity, patient age, biomarkers and endoscopic adjuncts remain under consideration and are discussed in full. Recent evidence has been published to support earlier endoscopic intervention by means of ablation of the metaplastic Barrett’s segment when the earliest signs of dysplasia are detected. Further work should concentrate on establishing better risk stratification and primary and secondary preventative strategies to reduce the risk of adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5537175
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Baishideng Publishing Group Inc
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55371752017-08-15 Barrett’s oesophagus: Current controversies Amadi, Chidi Gatenby, Piers World J Gastroenterol Review Oesophageal adenocarcinoma is rapidly increasing in Western countries. This tumour frequently presents late in its course with metastatic disease and has a very poor prognosis. Barrett’s oesophagus is an acquired condition whereby the native squamous mucosa of the lower oesophagus is replaced by columnar epithelium following prolonged gastro-oesophageal reflux and is the recognised precursor lesion for oesophageal adenocarcinoma. There are multiple national and society guidelines regarding screening, surveillance and management of Barrett’s oesophagus, however all are limited regarding a clear evidence base for a well-demonstrated benefit and cost-effectiveness of surveillance, and robust risk stratification for patients to best use resources. Currently the accepted risk factors upon which surveillance intervals and interventions are based are Barrett’s segment length and histological interpretation of the systematic biopsies. Further patient risk factors including other demographic features, smoking, gender, obesity, ethnicity, patient age, biomarkers and endoscopic adjuncts remain under consideration and are discussed in full. Recent evidence has been published to support earlier endoscopic intervention by means of ablation of the metaplastic Barrett’s segment when the earliest signs of dysplasia are detected. Further work should concentrate on establishing better risk stratification and primary and secondary preventative strategies to reduce the risk of adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus. Baishideng Publishing Group Inc 2017-07-28 2017-07-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5537175/ /pubmed/28811703 http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i28.5051 Text en ©The Author(s) 2017. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is an open-access article which was selected by an in-house editor and fully peer-reviewed by external reviewers. It is distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial.
spellingShingle Review
Amadi, Chidi
Gatenby, Piers
Barrett’s oesophagus: Current controversies
title Barrett’s oesophagus: Current controversies
title_full Barrett’s oesophagus: Current controversies
title_fullStr Barrett’s oesophagus: Current controversies
title_full_unstemmed Barrett’s oesophagus: Current controversies
title_short Barrett’s oesophagus: Current controversies
title_sort barrett’s oesophagus: current controversies
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5537175/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28811703
http://dx.doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i28.5051
work_keys_str_mv AT amadichidi barrettsoesophaguscurrentcontroversies
AT gatenbypiers barrettsoesophaguscurrentcontroversies