Cargando…

Tumour heterogeneity poses a significant challenge to cancer biomarker research

BACKGROUND: The high degree of genomic diversity in cancer represents a challenge for identifying objective prognostic markers. We aimed to examine the extent of tumour heterogeneity and its effect on the evaluation of a selected prognostic marker using prostate cancer as a model. METHODS: We assess...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cyll, Karolina, Ersvær, Elin, Vlatkovic, Ljiljana, Pradhan, Manohar, Kildal, Wanja, Avranden Kjær, Marte, Kleppe, Andreas, Hveem, Tarjei S, Carlsen, Birgitte, Gill, Silje, Löffeler, Sven, Haug, Erik Skaaheim, Wæhre, Håkon, Sooriakumaran, Prasanna, Danielsen, Håvard E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5537489/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28618431
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2017.171
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The high degree of genomic diversity in cancer represents a challenge for identifying objective prognostic markers. We aimed to examine the extent of tumour heterogeneity and its effect on the evaluation of a selected prognostic marker using prostate cancer as a model. METHODS: We assessed Gleason Score (GS), DNA ploidy status and phosphatase and tensin homologue (PTEN) expression in radical prostatectomy specimens (RP) from 304 patients followed for a median of 10 years (interquartile range 6–12). GS was assessed for every tumour-containing block and DNA ploidy for a median of four samples for each RP. In a subgroup of 40 patients we assessed DNA ploidy and PTEN status in every tumour-containing block. In 102 patients assigned to active surveillance (AS), GS and DNA ploidy were studied in needle biopsies. RESULTS: Extensive heterogeneity was observed for GS (89% of the patients) and DNA ploidy (40% of the patients) in the cohort, and DNA ploidy (60% of the patients) and PTEN expression (75% of the patients) in the subgroup. DNA ploidy was a significant prognostic marker when heterogeneity was taken into consideration. In the AS cohort we found heterogeneity in GS (24%) and in DNA ploidy (25%) specimens. CONCLUSIONS: Multi-sample analysis should be performed to support clinical treatment decisions.