Cargando…
Tumour heterogeneity poses a significant challenge to cancer biomarker research
BACKGROUND: The high degree of genomic diversity in cancer represents a challenge for identifying objective prognostic markers. We aimed to examine the extent of tumour heterogeneity and its effect on the evaluation of a selected prognostic marker using prostate cancer as a model. METHODS: We assess...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5537489/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28618431 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2017.171 |
_version_ | 1783254189621641216 |
---|---|
author | Cyll, Karolina Ersvær, Elin Vlatkovic, Ljiljana Pradhan, Manohar Kildal, Wanja Avranden Kjær, Marte Kleppe, Andreas Hveem, Tarjei S Carlsen, Birgitte Gill, Silje Löffeler, Sven Haug, Erik Skaaheim Wæhre, Håkon Sooriakumaran, Prasanna Danielsen, Håvard E |
author_facet | Cyll, Karolina Ersvær, Elin Vlatkovic, Ljiljana Pradhan, Manohar Kildal, Wanja Avranden Kjær, Marte Kleppe, Andreas Hveem, Tarjei S Carlsen, Birgitte Gill, Silje Löffeler, Sven Haug, Erik Skaaheim Wæhre, Håkon Sooriakumaran, Prasanna Danielsen, Håvard E |
author_sort | Cyll, Karolina |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The high degree of genomic diversity in cancer represents a challenge for identifying objective prognostic markers. We aimed to examine the extent of tumour heterogeneity and its effect on the evaluation of a selected prognostic marker using prostate cancer as a model. METHODS: We assessed Gleason Score (GS), DNA ploidy status and phosphatase and tensin homologue (PTEN) expression in radical prostatectomy specimens (RP) from 304 patients followed for a median of 10 years (interquartile range 6–12). GS was assessed for every tumour-containing block and DNA ploidy for a median of four samples for each RP. In a subgroup of 40 patients we assessed DNA ploidy and PTEN status in every tumour-containing block. In 102 patients assigned to active surveillance (AS), GS and DNA ploidy were studied in needle biopsies. RESULTS: Extensive heterogeneity was observed for GS (89% of the patients) and DNA ploidy (40% of the patients) in the cohort, and DNA ploidy (60% of the patients) and PTEN expression (75% of the patients) in the subgroup. DNA ploidy was a significant prognostic marker when heterogeneity was taken into consideration. In the AS cohort we found heterogeneity in GS (24%) and in DNA ploidy (25%) specimens. CONCLUSIONS: Multi-sample analysis should be performed to support clinical treatment decisions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5537489 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55374892017-08-04 Tumour heterogeneity poses a significant challenge to cancer biomarker research Cyll, Karolina Ersvær, Elin Vlatkovic, Ljiljana Pradhan, Manohar Kildal, Wanja Avranden Kjær, Marte Kleppe, Andreas Hveem, Tarjei S Carlsen, Birgitte Gill, Silje Löffeler, Sven Haug, Erik Skaaheim Wæhre, Håkon Sooriakumaran, Prasanna Danielsen, Håvard E Br J Cancer Molecular Diagnostics BACKGROUND: The high degree of genomic diversity in cancer represents a challenge for identifying objective prognostic markers. We aimed to examine the extent of tumour heterogeneity and its effect on the evaluation of a selected prognostic marker using prostate cancer as a model. METHODS: We assessed Gleason Score (GS), DNA ploidy status and phosphatase and tensin homologue (PTEN) expression in radical prostatectomy specimens (RP) from 304 patients followed for a median of 10 years (interquartile range 6–12). GS was assessed for every tumour-containing block and DNA ploidy for a median of four samples for each RP. In a subgroup of 40 patients we assessed DNA ploidy and PTEN status in every tumour-containing block. In 102 patients assigned to active surveillance (AS), GS and DNA ploidy were studied in needle biopsies. RESULTS: Extensive heterogeneity was observed for GS (89% of the patients) and DNA ploidy (40% of the patients) in the cohort, and DNA ploidy (60% of the patients) and PTEN expression (75% of the patients) in the subgroup. DNA ploidy was a significant prognostic marker when heterogeneity was taken into consideration. In the AS cohort we found heterogeneity in GS (24%) and in DNA ploidy (25%) specimens. CONCLUSIONS: Multi-sample analysis should be performed to support clinical treatment decisions. Nature Publishing Group 2017-07-25 2017-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC5537489/ /pubmed/28618431 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2017.171 Text en Copyright © 2017 The Author(s) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Non-Commercial-Share Alike 4.0 International License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Molecular Diagnostics Cyll, Karolina Ersvær, Elin Vlatkovic, Ljiljana Pradhan, Manohar Kildal, Wanja Avranden Kjær, Marte Kleppe, Andreas Hveem, Tarjei S Carlsen, Birgitte Gill, Silje Löffeler, Sven Haug, Erik Skaaheim Wæhre, Håkon Sooriakumaran, Prasanna Danielsen, Håvard E Tumour heterogeneity poses a significant challenge to cancer biomarker research |
title | Tumour heterogeneity poses a significant challenge to cancer biomarker research |
title_full | Tumour heterogeneity poses a significant challenge to cancer biomarker research |
title_fullStr | Tumour heterogeneity poses a significant challenge to cancer biomarker research |
title_full_unstemmed | Tumour heterogeneity poses a significant challenge to cancer biomarker research |
title_short | Tumour heterogeneity poses a significant challenge to cancer biomarker research |
title_sort | tumour heterogeneity poses a significant challenge to cancer biomarker research |
topic | Molecular Diagnostics |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5537489/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28618431 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2017.171 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cyllkarolina tumourheterogeneityposesasignificantchallengetocancerbiomarkerresearch AT ersværelin tumourheterogeneityposesasignificantchallengetocancerbiomarkerresearch AT vlatkovicljiljana tumourheterogeneityposesasignificantchallengetocancerbiomarkerresearch AT pradhanmanohar tumourheterogeneityposesasignificantchallengetocancerbiomarkerresearch AT kildalwanja tumourheterogeneityposesasignificantchallengetocancerbiomarkerresearch AT avrandenkjærmarte tumourheterogeneityposesasignificantchallengetocancerbiomarkerresearch AT kleppeandreas tumourheterogeneityposesasignificantchallengetocancerbiomarkerresearch AT hveemtarjeis tumourheterogeneityposesasignificantchallengetocancerbiomarkerresearch AT carlsenbirgitte tumourheterogeneityposesasignificantchallengetocancerbiomarkerresearch AT gillsilje tumourheterogeneityposesasignificantchallengetocancerbiomarkerresearch AT loffelersven tumourheterogeneityposesasignificantchallengetocancerbiomarkerresearch AT haugerikskaaheim tumourheterogeneityposesasignificantchallengetocancerbiomarkerresearch AT wæhrehakon tumourheterogeneityposesasignificantchallengetocancerbiomarkerresearch AT sooriakumaranprasanna tumourheterogeneityposesasignificantchallengetocancerbiomarkerresearch AT danielsenhavarde tumourheterogeneityposesasignificantchallengetocancerbiomarkerresearch |