Cargando…
Immunotherapies in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: efficacy and predictors of response
OBJECTIVE: To analyse predictors for relapses and number of attacks under different immunotherapies in patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study conducted in neurology departments at 21 regional and university hospitals in Germany. Eli...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5537514/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28572277 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2017-315603 |
_version_ | 1783254195532464128 |
---|---|
author | Stellmann, Jan-Patrick Krumbholz, Markus Friede, Tim Gahlen, Anna Borisow, Nadja Fischer, Katrin Hellwig, Kerstin Pache, Florence Ruprecht, Klemens Havla, Joachim Kümpfel, Tania Aktas, Orhan Hartung, Hans-Peter Ringelstein, Marius Geis, Christian Kleinschnitz, Christoph Berthele, Achim Hemmer, Bernhard Angstwurm, Klemens Young, Kim Lea Schuster, Simon Stangel, Martin Lauda, Florian Tumani, Hayrettin Mayer, Christoph Zeltner, Lena Ziemann, Ulf Linker, Ralf Andreas Schwab, Matthias Marziniak, Martin Then Bergh, Florian Hofstadt-van Oy, Ulrich Neuhaus, Oliver Zettl, Uwe Faiss, Jürgen Wildemann, Brigitte Paul, Friedemann Jarius, Sven Trebst, Corinna Kleiter, Ingo |
author_facet | Stellmann, Jan-Patrick Krumbholz, Markus Friede, Tim Gahlen, Anna Borisow, Nadja Fischer, Katrin Hellwig, Kerstin Pache, Florence Ruprecht, Klemens Havla, Joachim Kümpfel, Tania Aktas, Orhan Hartung, Hans-Peter Ringelstein, Marius Geis, Christian Kleinschnitz, Christoph Berthele, Achim Hemmer, Bernhard Angstwurm, Klemens Young, Kim Lea Schuster, Simon Stangel, Martin Lauda, Florian Tumani, Hayrettin Mayer, Christoph Zeltner, Lena Ziemann, Ulf Linker, Ralf Andreas Schwab, Matthias Marziniak, Martin Then Bergh, Florian Hofstadt-van Oy, Ulrich Neuhaus, Oliver Zettl, Uwe Faiss, Jürgen Wildemann, Brigitte Paul, Friedemann Jarius, Sven Trebst, Corinna Kleiter, Ingo |
author_sort | Stellmann, Jan-Patrick |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To analyse predictors for relapses and number of attacks under different immunotherapies in patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study conducted in neurology departments at 21 regional and university hospitals in Germany. Eligible participants were patients with aquaporin-4-antibody-positive or aquaporin-4-antibody-negative NMOSD. Main outcome measures were HRs from Cox proportional hazard regression models adjusted for centre effects, important prognostic factors and repeated treatment episodes. RESULTS: 265 treatment episodes with a mean duration of 442 days (total of 321 treatment years) in 144 patients (mean age at first attack: 40.9 years, 82.6% female, 86.1% aquaporin-4-antibody-positive) were analysed. 191 attacks occurred during any of the treatments (annual relapse rate=0.60). The most common treatments were rituximab (n=77, 111 patient-years), azathioprine (n=52, 68 patient-years), interferon-β (n=32, 61 patient-years), mitoxantrone (n=34, 32.1 patient-years) and glatiramer acetate (n=17, 10 patient-years). Azathioprine (HR=0.4, 95% CI 0.3 to 0.7, p=0.001) and rituximab (HR=0.6, 95% CI 0.4 to 1.0, p=0.034) reduced the attack risk compared with interferon-β, whereas mitoxantrone and glatiramer acetate did not. Patients who were aquaporin-4-antibody-positive had a higher risk of attacks (HR=2.5, 95% CI 1.3 to 5.1, p=0.009). Every decade of age was associated with a lower risk for attacks (HR=0.8, 95% CI 0.7 to 1.0, p=0.039). A previous attack under the same treatment tended to be predictive for further attacks (HR=1.5, 95% CI 1.0 to 2.4, p=0.065). CONCLUSIONS: Age, antibody status and possibly previous attacks predict further attacks in patients treated for NMOSD. Azathioprine and rituximab are superior to interferon-β. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5537514 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55375142017-08-03 Immunotherapies in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: efficacy and predictors of response Stellmann, Jan-Patrick Krumbholz, Markus Friede, Tim Gahlen, Anna Borisow, Nadja Fischer, Katrin Hellwig, Kerstin Pache, Florence Ruprecht, Klemens Havla, Joachim Kümpfel, Tania Aktas, Orhan Hartung, Hans-Peter Ringelstein, Marius Geis, Christian Kleinschnitz, Christoph Berthele, Achim Hemmer, Bernhard Angstwurm, Klemens Young, Kim Lea Schuster, Simon Stangel, Martin Lauda, Florian Tumani, Hayrettin Mayer, Christoph Zeltner, Lena Ziemann, Ulf Linker, Ralf Andreas Schwab, Matthias Marziniak, Martin Then Bergh, Florian Hofstadt-van Oy, Ulrich Neuhaus, Oliver Zettl, Uwe Faiss, Jürgen Wildemann, Brigitte Paul, Friedemann Jarius, Sven Trebst, Corinna Kleiter, Ingo J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry Neuro-Inflammation OBJECTIVE: To analyse predictors for relapses and number of attacks under different immunotherapies in patients with neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD). DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study conducted in neurology departments at 21 regional and university hospitals in Germany. Eligible participants were patients with aquaporin-4-antibody-positive or aquaporin-4-antibody-negative NMOSD. Main outcome measures were HRs from Cox proportional hazard regression models adjusted for centre effects, important prognostic factors and repeated treatment episodes. RESULTS: 265 treatment episodes with a mean duration of 442 days (total of 321 treatment years) in 144 patients (mean age at first attack: 40.9 years, 82.6% female, 86.1% aquaporin-4-antibody-positive) were analysed. 191 attacks occurred during any of the treatments (annual relapse rate=0.60). The most common treatments were rituximab (n=77, 111 patient-years), azathioprine (n=52, 68 patient-years), interferon-β (n=32, 61 patient-years), mitoxantrone (n=34, 32.1 patient-years) and glatiramer acetate (n=17, 10 patient-years). Azathioprine (HR=0.4, 95% CI 0.3 to 0.7, p=0.001) and rituximab (HR=0.6, 95% CI 0.4 to 1.0, p=0.034) reduced the attack risk compared with interferon-β, whereas mitoxantrone and glatiramer acetate did not. Patients who were aquaporin-4-antibody-positive had a higher risk of attacks (HR=2.5, 95% CI 1.3 to 5.1, p=0.009). Every decade of age was associated with a lower risk for attacks (HR=0.8, 95% CI 0.7 to 1.0, p=0.039). A previous attack under the same treatment tended to be predictive for further attacks (HR=1.5, 95% CI 1.0 to 2.4, p=0.065). CONCLUSIONS: Age, antibody status and possibly previous attacks predict further attacks in patients treated for NMOSD. Azathioprine and rituximab are superior to interferon-β. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry 2017-08 2017-06-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5537514/ /pubmed/28572277 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2017-315603 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Neuro-Inflammation Stellmann, Jan-Patrick Krumbholz, Markus Friede, Tim Gahlen, Anna Borisow, Nadja Fischer, Katrin Hellwig, Kerstin Pache, Florence Ruprecht, Klemens Havla, Joachim Kümpfel, Tania Aktas, Orhan Hartung, Hans-Peter Ringelstein, Marius Geis, Christian Kleinschnitz, Christoph Berthele, Achim Hemmer, Bernhard Angstwurm, Klemens Young, Kim Lea Schuster, Simon Stangel, Martin Lauda, Florian Tumani, Hayrettin Mayer, Christoph Zeltner, Lena Ziemann, Ulf Linker, Ralf Andreas Schwab, Matthias Marziniak, Martin Then Bergh, Florian Hofstadt-van Oy, Ulrich Neuhaus, Oliver Zettl, Uwe Faiss, Jürgen Wildemann, Brigitte Paul, Friedemann Jarius, Sven Trebst, Corinna Kleiter, Ingo Immunotherapies in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: efficacy and predictors of response |
title | Immunotherapies in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: efficacy and predictors of response |
title_full | Immunotherapies in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: efficacy and predictors of response |
title_fullStr | Immunotherapies in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: efficacy and predictors of response |
title_full_unstemmed | Immunotherapies in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: efficacy and predictors of response |
title_short | Immunotherapies in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: efficacy and predictors of response |
title_sort | immunotherapies in neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder: efficacy and predictors of response |
topic | Neuro-Inflammation |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5537514/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28572277 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jnnp-2017-315603 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT stellmannjanpatrick immunotherapiesinneuromyelitisopticaspectrumdisorderefficacyandpredictorsofresponse AT krumbholzmarkus immunotherapiesinneuromyelitisopticaspectrumdisorderefficacyandpredictorsofresponse AT friedetim immunotherapiesinneuromyelitisopticaspectrumdisorderefficacyandpredictorsofresponse AT gahlenanna immunotherapiesinneuromyelitisopticaspectrumdisorderefficacyandpredictorsofresponse AT borisownadja immunotherapiesinneuromyelitisopticaspectrumdisorderefficacyandpredictorsofresponse AT fischerkatrin immunotherapiesinneuromyelitisopticaspectrumdisorderefficacyandpredictorsofresponse AT hellwigkerstin immunotherapiesinneuromyelitisopticaspectrumdisorderefficacyandpredictorsofresponse AT pacheflorence immunotherapiesinneuromyelitisopticaspectrumdisorderefficacyandpredictorsofresponse AT ruprechtklemens immunotherapiesinneuromyelitisopticaspectrumdisorderefficacyandpredictorsofresponse AT havlajoachim immunotherapiesinneuromyelitisopticaspectrumdisorderefficacyandpredictorsofresponse AT kumpfeltania immunotherapiesinneuromyelitisopticaspectrumdisorderefficacyandpredictorsofresponse AT aktasorhan immunotherapiesinneuromyelitisopticaspectrumdisorderefficacyandpredictorsofresponse AT hartunghanspeter immunotherapiesinneuromyelitisopticaspectrumdisorderefficacyandpredictorsofresponse AT ringelsteinmarius immunotherapiesinneuromyelitisopticaspectrumdisorderefficacyandpredictorsofresponse AT geischristian immunotherapiesinneuromyelitisopticaspectrumdisorderefficacyandpredictorsofresponse AT kleinschnitzchristoph immunotherapiesinneuromyelitisopticaspectrumdisorderefficacyandpredictorsofresponse AT bertheleachim immunotherapiesinneuromyelitisopticaspectrumdisorderefficacyandpredictorsofresponse AT hemmerbernhard immunotherapiesinneuromyelitisopticaspectrumdisorderefficacyandpredictorsofresponse AT angstwurmklemens immunotherapiesinneuromyelitisopticaspectrumdisorderefficacyandpredictorsofresponse AT youngkimlea immunotherapiesinneuromyelitisopticaspectrumdisorderefficacyandpredictorsofresponse AT schustersimon immunotherapiesinneuromyelitisopticaspectrumdisorderefficacyandpredictorsofresponse AT stangelmartin immunotherapiesinneuromyelitisopticaspectrumdisorderefficacyandpredictorsofresponse AT laudaflorian immunotherapiesinneuromyelitisopticaspectrumdisorderefficacyandpredictorsofresponse AT tumanihayrettin immunotherapiesinneuromyelitisopticaspectrumdisorderefficacyandpredictorsofresponse AT mayerchristoph immunotherapiesinneuromyelitisopticaspectrumdisorderefficacyandpredictorsofresponse AT zeltnerlena immunotherapiesinneuromyelitisopticaspectrumdisorderefficacyandpredictorsofresponse AT ziemannulf immunotherapiesinneuromyelitisopticaspectrumdisorderefficacyandpredictorsofresponse AT linkerralfandreas immunotherapiesinneuromyelitisopticaspectrumdisorderefficacyandpredictorsofresponse AT schwabmatthias immunotherapiesinneuromyelitisopticaspectrumdisorderefficacyandpredictorsofresponse AT marziniakmartin immunotherapiesinneuromyelitisopticaspectrumdisorderefficacyandpredictorsofresponse AT thenberghflorian immunotherapiesinneuromyelitisopticaspectrumdisorderefficacyandpredictorsofresponse AT hofstadtvanoyulrich immunotherapiesinneuromyelitisopticaspectrumdisorderefficacyandpredictorsofresponse AT neuhausoliver immunotherapiesinneuromyelitisopticaspectrumdisorderefficacyandpredictorsofresponse AT zettluwe immunotherapiesinneuromyelitisopticaspectrumdisorderefficacyandpredictorsofresponse AT faissjurgen immunotherapiesinneuromyelitisopticaspectrumdisorderefficacyandpredictorsofresponse AT wildemannbrigitte immunotherapiesinneuromyelitisopticaspectrumdisorderefficacyandpredictorsofresponse AT paulfriedemann immunotherapiesinneuromyelitisopticaspectrumdisorderefficacyandpredictorsofresponse AT jariussven immunotherapiesinneuromyelitisopticaspectrumdisorderefficacyandpredictorsofresponse AT trebstcorinna immunotherapiesinneuromyelitisopticaspectrumdisorderefficacyandpredictorsofresponse AT kleiteringo immunotherapiesinneuromyelitisopticaspectrumdisorderefficacyandpredictorsofresponse |