Cargando…
Combining qualitative and quantitative operational research methods to inform quality improvement in pathways that span multiple settings
BACKGROUND: Improving integration and continuity of care across sectors within resource constraints is a priority in many health systems. Qualitative operational research methods of problem structuring have been used to address quality improvement in services involving multiple sectors but not in co...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5537516/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28062603 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2016-005636 |
_version_ | 1783254196009566208 |
---|---|
author | Crowe, Sonya Brown, Katherine Tregay, Jenifer Wray, Jo Knowles, Rachel Ridout, Deborah A Bull, Catherine Utley, Martin |
author_facet | Crowe, Sonya Brown, Katherine Tregay, Jenifer Wray, Jo Knowles, Rachel Ridout, Deborah A Bull, Catherine Utley, Martin |
author_sort | Crowe, Sonya |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Improving integration and continuity of care across sectors within resource constraints is a priority in many health systems. Qualitative operational research methods of problem structuring have been used to address quality improvement in services involving multiple sectors but not in combination with quantitative operational research methods that enable targeting of interventions according to patient risk. We aimed to combine these methods to augment and inform an improvement initiative concerning infants with congenital heart disease (CHD) whose complex care pathway spans multiple sectors. METHODS: Soft systems methodology was used to consider systematically changes to services from the perspectives of community, primary, secondary and tertiary care professionals and a patient group, incorporating relevant evidence. Classification and regression tree (CART) analysis of national audit datasets was conducted along with data visualisation designed to inform service improvement within the context of limited resources. RESULTS: A ‘Rich Picture’ was developed capturing the main features of services for infants with CHD pertinent to service improvement. This was used, along with a graphical summary of the CART analysis, to guide discussions about targeting interventions at specific patient risk groups. Agreement was reached across representatives of relevant health professions and patients on a coherent set of targeted recommendations for quality improvement. These fed into national decisions about service provision and commissioning. CONCLUSIONS: When tackling complex problems in service provision across multiple settings, it is important to acknowledge and work with multiple perspectives systematically and to consider targeting service improvements in response to confined resources. Our research demonstrates that applying a combination of qualitative and quantitative operational research methods is one approach to doing so that warrants further consideration. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5537516 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55375162017-08-03 Combining qualitative and quantitative operational research methods to inform quality improvement in pathways that span multiple settings Crowe, Sonya Brown, Katherine Tregay, Jenifer Wray, Jo Knowles, Rachel Ridout, Deborah A Bull, Catherine Utley, Martin BMJ Qual Saf Original Research BACKGROUND: Improving integration and continuity of care across sectors within resource constraints is a priority in many health systems. Qualitative operational research methods of problem structuring have been used to address quality improvement in services involving multiple sectors but not in combination with quantitative operational research methods that enable targeting of interventions according to patient risk. We aimed to combine these methods to augment and inform an improvement initiative concerning infants with congenital heart disease (CHD) whose complex care pathway spans multiple sectors. METHODS: Soft systems methodology was used to consider systematically changes to services from the perspectives of community, primary, secondary and tertiary care professionals and a patient group, incorporating relevant evidence. Classification and regression tree (CART) analysis of national audit datasets was conducted along with data visualisation designed to inform service improvement within the context of limited resources. RESULTS: A ‘Rich Picture’ was developed capturing the main features of services for infants with CHD pertinent to service improvement. This was used, along with a graphical summary of the CART analysis, to guide discussions about targeting interventions at specific patient risk groups. Agreement was reached across representatives of relevant health professions and patients on a coherent set of targeted recommendations for quality improvement. These fed into national decisions about service provision and commissioning. CONCLUSIONS: When tackling complex problems in service provision across multiple settings, it is important to acknowledge and work with multiple perspectives systematically and to consider targeting service improvements in response to confined resources. Our research demonstrates that applying a combination of qualitative and quantitative operational research methods is one approach to doing so that warrants further consideration. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-08 2017-01-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5537516/ /pubmed/28062603 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2016-005636 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Original Research Crowe, Sonya Brown, Katherine Tregay, Jenifer Wray, Jo Knowles, Rachel Ridout, Deborah A Bull, Catherine Utley, Martin Combining qualitative and quantitative operational research methods to inform quality improvement in pathways that span multiple settings |
title | Combining qualitative and quantitative operational research methods to inform quality improvement in pathways that span multiple settings |
title_full | Combining qualitative and quantitative operational research methods to inform quality improvement in pathways that span multiple settings |
title_fullStr | Combining qualitative and quantitative operational research methods to inform quality improvement in pathways that span multiple settings |
title_full_unstemmed | Combining qualitative and quantitative operational research methods to inform quality improvement in pathways that span multiple settings |
title_short | Combining qualitative and quantitative operational research methods to inform quality improvement in pathways that span multiple settings |
title_sort | combining qualitative and quantitative operational research methods to inform quality improvement in pathways that span multiple settings |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5537516/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28062603 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2016-005636 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT crowesonya combiningqualitativeandquantitativeoperationalresearchmethodstoinformqualityimprovementinpathwaysthatspanmultiplesettings AT brownkatherine combiningqualitativeandquantitativeoperationalresearchmethodstoinformqualityimprovementinpathwaysthatspanmultiplesettings AT tregayjenifer combiningqualitativeandquantitativeoperationalresearchmethodstoinformqualityimprovementinpathwaysthatspanmultiplesettings AT wrayjo combiningqualitativeandquantitativeoperationalresearchmethodstoinformqualityimprovementinpathwaysthatspanmultiplesettings AT knowlesrachel combiningqualitativeandquantitativeoperationalresearchmethodstoinformqualityimprovementinpathwaysthatspanmultiplesettings AT ridoutdeboraha combiningqualitativeandquantitativeoperationalresearchmethodstoinformqualityimprovementinpathwaysthatspanmultiplesettings AT bullcatherine combiningqualitativeandquantitativeoperationalresearchmethodstoinformqualityimprovementinpathwaysthatspanmultiplesettings AT utleymartin combiningqualitativeandquantitativeoperationalresearchmethodstoinformqualityimprovementinpathwaysthatspanmultiplesettings |