Cargando…

Effects of injectable progestogen contraception versus the copper intrauterine device on HIV acquisition: sub-study of a pragmatic randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Evidence from observational studies suggests an increased risk of HIV acquisition among women using depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) contraception. METHODS: Within the context of a South African programme to increase women's access to the intrauterine contraceptive device (I...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hofmeyr, G Justus, Singata-Madliki, Mandisa, Lawrie, Theresa A, Bergel, Eduardo, Temmerman, Marleen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5537534/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28381443
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jfprhc-2016-101607
_version_ 1783254200315019264
author Hofmeyr, G Justus
Singata-Madliki, Mandisa
Lawrie, Theresa A
Bergel, Eduardo
Temmerman, Marleen
author_facet Hofmeyr, G Justus
Singata-Madliki, Mandisa
Lawrie, Theresa A
Bergel, Eduardo
Temmerman, Marleen
author_sort Hofmeyr, G Justus
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Evidence from observational studies suggests an increased risk of HIV acquisition among women using depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) contraception. METHODS: Within the context of a South African programme to increase women's access to the intrauterine contraceptive device (IUD), we conducted a pragmatic, open-label, parallel-arm, randomised controlled trial (RCT) of the IUD versus injectable progestogen contraception (IPC) at two South African hospitals. The primary outcome was pregnancy; secondary outcomes included HIV acquisition. Consenting women attending termination of pregnancy services were randomised after pregnancy termination between July 2009 and November 2012. Condoms were promoted for the prevention of sexually transmitted infections. Voluntary HIV testing was offered at baseline and at 12 or more months later. Findings on HIV acquisition are reported in this article. RESULTS: HIV acquisition data were available for 1290 initially HIV-negative women who underwent a final study interview at a median of 20 months after randomisation to IPC or an IUD. Baseline group characteristics were comparable. In the IPC group, 545/656 (83%) of participants received DMPA, 96 (15%) received injectable norethisterone enanthate, 14 (2%) received the IUD and one received oral contraception. In the IUD group 609 (96%) received the IUD, 20 (3%) received IPC and 5 (1%) had missing data. According to intention-to-treat analysis, HIV acquisition occurred in 20/656 (3.0%) women in the IPC arm and 22/634 (3.5%) women in the IUD arm (IPC vs IUD, risk ratio 0.88; 95% confidence interval 0.48–1.59; p=0.7). CONCLUSIONS: This sub-study was underpowered to rule out moderate differences in HIV risk, but confirms the feasibility of randomised trial methodology to address this question. Larger RCTs are needed to determine the relative risks of various contraceptive methods on HIV acquisition with greater precision. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Pan African Clinical Trials Registry number PACTR201409000880157 (04-09-2014).
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5537534
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55375342017-10-06 Effects of injectable progestogen contraception versus the copper intrauterine device on HIV acquisition: sub-study of a pragmatic randomised controlled trial Hofmeyr, G Justus Singata-Madliki, Mandisa Lawrie, Theresa A Bergel, Eduardo Temmerman, Marleen J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care Research BACKGROUND: Evidence from observational studies suggests an increased risk of HIV acquisition among women using depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) contraception. METHODS: Within the context of a South African programme to increase women's access to the intrauterine contraceptive device (IUD), we conducted a pragmatic, open-label, parallel-arm, randomised controlled trial (RCT) of the IUD versus injectable progestogen contraception (IPC) at two South African hospitals. The primary outcome was pregnancy; secondary outcomes included HIV acquisition. Consenting women attending termination of pregnancy services were randomised after pregnancy termination between July 2009 and November 2012. Condoms were promoted for the prevention of sexually transmitted infections. Voluntary HIV testing was offered at baseline and at 12 or more months later. Findings on HIV acquisition are reported in this article. RESULTS: HIV acquisition data were available for 1290 initially HIV-negative women who underwent a final study interview at a median of 20 months after randomisation to IPC or an IUD. Baseline group characteristics were comparable. In the IPC group, 545/656 (83%) of participants received DMPA, 96 (15%) received injectable norethisterone enanthate, 14 (2%) received the IUD and one received oral contraception. In the IUD group 609 (96%) received the IUD, 20 (3%) received IPC and 5 (1%) had missing data. According to intention-to-treat analysis, HIV acquisition occurred in 20/656 (3.0%) women in the IPC arm and 22/634 (3.5%) women in the IUD arm (IPC vs IUD, risk ratio 0.88; 95% confidence interval 0.48–1.59; p=0.7). CONCLUSIONS: This sub-study was underpowered to rule out moderate differences in HIV risk, but confirms the feasibility of randomised trial methodology to address this question. Larger RCTs are needed to determine the relative risks of various contraceptive methods on HIV acquisition with greater precision. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: Pan African Clinical Trials Registry number PACTR201409000880157 (04-09-2014). BMJ Publishing Group 2017-07 2017-04-05 /pmc/articles/PMC5537534/ /pubmed/28381443 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jfprhc-2016-101607 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/ This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Research
Hofmeyr, G Justus
Singata-Madliki, Mandisa
Lawrie, Theresa A
Bergel, Eduardo
Temmerman, Marleen
Effects of injectable progestogen contraception versus the copper intrauterine device on HIV acquisition: sub-study of a pragmatic randomised controlled trial
title Effects of injectable progestogen contraception versus the copper intrauterine device on HIV acquisition: sub-study of a pragmatic randomised controlled trial
title_full Effects of injectable progestogen contraception versus the copper intrauterine device on HIV acquisition: sub-study of a pragmatic randomised controlled trial
title_fullStr Effects of injectable progestogen contraception versus the copper intrauterine device on HIV acquisition: sub-study of a pragmatic randomised controlled trial
title_full_unstemmed Effects of injectable progestogen contraception versus the copper intrauterine device on HIV acquisition: sub-study of a pragmatic randomised controlled trial
title_short Effects of injectable progestogen contraception versus the copper intrauterine device on HIV acquisition: sub-study of a pragmatic randomised controlled trial
title_sort effects of injectable progestogen contraception versus the copper intrauterine device on hiv acquisition: sub-study of a pragmatic randomised controlled trial
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5537534/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28381443
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/jfprhc-2016-101607
work_keys_str_mv AT hofmeyrgjustus effectsofinjectableprogestogencontraceptionversusthecopperintrauterinedeviceonhivacquisitionsubstudyofapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT singatamadlikimandisa effectsofinjectableprogestogencontraceptionversusthecopperintrauterinedeviceonhivacquisitionsubstudyofapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT lawrietheresaa effectsofinjectableprogestogencontraceptionversusthecopperintrauterinedeviceonhivacquisitionsubstudyofapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT bergeleduardo effectsofinjectableprogestogencontraceptionversusthecopperintrauterinedeviceonhivacquisitionsubstudyofapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrial
AT temmermanmarleen effectsofinjectableprogestogencontraceptionversusthecopperintrauterinedeviceonhivacquisitionsubstudyofapragmaticrandomisedcontrolledtrial