Cargando…

Evaluation of the 13-item Hypomania Checklist and a brief 3-item manic features questionnaire in primary care

Aims and method The mean delay for bipolar disorder diagnosis is 10 years. Identification of patients with previous hypomania is challenging, sometimes resulting in misdiagnosis. The aims of this study were: (a) to estimate the proportion of primary care patients with depression currently taking ant...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Singh, Sukhmeet, Scouller, Paul, Smith, Daniel J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Royal College of Psychiatrists 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5537571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28811911
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/pb.bp.116.054577
_version_ 1783254208850427904
author Singh, Sukhmeet
Scouller, Paul
Smith, Daniel J.
author_facet Singh, Sukhmeet
Scouller, Paul
Smith, Daniel J.
author_sort Singh, Sukhmeet
collection PubMed
description Aims and method The mean delay for bipolar disorder diagnosis is 10 years. Identification of patients with previous hypomania is challenging, sometimes resulting in misdiagnosis. The aims of this study were: (a) to estimate the proportion of primary care patients with depression currently taking antidepressants who have undiagnosed bipolar disorder and (b) to compare a brief 3-item manic features questionnaire with the Hypomania Checklist (HCL-13). The sample comprised patients with a recorded diagnosis of depression, either on long-term antidepressant therapy or with previous multiple courses of antidepressants. Results Of 149 participants assessed, 24 (16.1%) satisfied criteria for bipolar disorder. Areas under the curve (AUC) for the 3-item questionnaire and the HCL-13 were similar (0.79 and 0.72, respectively) but positive predictive values (PPV) were low. Clinical implications Bipolar disorder may be underdiagnosed in primary care. A 3-item questionnaire could be used by general practitioners to screen for bipolar disorder in their patients with depression.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5537571
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Royal College of Psychiatrists
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55375712017-08-15 Evaluation of the 13-item Hypomania Checklist and a brief 3-item manic features questionnaire in primary care Singh, Sukhmeet Scouller, Paul Smith, Daniel J. BJPsych Bull Original Papers Aims and method The mean delay for bipolar disorder diagnosis is 10 years. Identification of patients with previous hypomania is challenging, sometimes resulting in misdiagnosis. The aims of this study were: (a) to estimate the proportion of primary care patients with depression currently taking antidepressants who have undiagnosed bipolar disorder and (b) to compare a brief 3-item manic features questionnaire with the Hypomania Checklist (HCL-13). The sample comprised patients with a recorded diagnosis of depression, either on long-term antidepressant therapy or with previous multiple courses of antidepressants. Results Of 149 participants assessed, 24 (16.1%) satisfied criteria for bipolar disorder. Areas under the curve (AUC) for the 3-item questionnaire and the HCL-13 were similar (0.79 and 0.72, respectively) but positive predictive values (PPV) were low. Clinical implications Bipolar disorder may be underdiagnosed in primary care. A 3-item questionnaire could be used by general practitioners to screen for bipolar disorder in their patients with depression. Royal College of Psychiatrists 2017-08 /pmc/articles/PMC5537571/ /pubmed/28811911 http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/pb.bp.116.054577 Text en © 2017 The Authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 This is an open-access article published by the Royal College of Psychiatrists and distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Papers
Singh, Sukhmeet
Scouller, Paul
Smith, Daniel J.
Evaluation of the 13-item Hypomania Checklist and a brief 3-item manic features questionnaire in primary care
title Evaluation of the 13-item Hypomania Checklist and a brief 3-item manic features questionnaire in primary care
title_full Evaluation of the 13-item Hypomania Checklist and a brief 3-item manic features questionnaire in primary care
title_fullStr Evaluation of the 13-item Hypomania Checklist and a brief 3-item manic features questionnaire in primary care
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the 13-item Hypomania Checklist and a brief 3-item manic features questionnaire in primary care
title_short Evaluation of the 13-item Hypomania Checklist and a brief 3-item manic features questionnaire in primary care
title_sort evaluation of the 13-item hypomania checklist and a brief 3-item manic features questionnaire in primary care
topic Original Papers
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5537571/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28811911
http://dx.doi.org/10.1192/pb.bp.116.054577
work_keys_str_mv AT singhsukhmeet evaluationofthe13itemhypomaniachecklistandabrief3itemmanicfeaturesquestionnaireinprimarycare
AT scoullerpaul evaluationofthe13itemhypomaniachecklistandabrief3itemmanicfeaturesquestionnaireinprimarycare
AT smithdanielj evaluationofthe13itemhypomaniachecklistandabrief3itemmanicfeaturesquestionnaireinprimarycare