Inappropriate shock in a subcutaneous cardiac defibrillator due to residual air

Inappropriate shock due to residual air in subcutaneous implantable cardiac defibrillators is not a well‐known complication. Obtaining overpenetrated X‐rays, recognizing electrocardiogram findings, limiting blunt finger dissection, and switching to sense at another vector are techniques which might...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lee, Shawn, Souvaliotis, Nektarios, Mehta, Davendra, Suri, Ranjit
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017
Materias:
Case Reports
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5538068/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28781823
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ccr3.1009
_version_ 1783254297184567296
author Lee, Shawn
Souvaliotis, Nektarios
Mehta, Davendra
Suri, Ranjit
author_facet Lee, Shawn
Souvaliotis, Nektarios
Mehta, Davendra
Suri, Ranjit
author_sort Lee, Shawn
collection PubMed
description Inappropriate shock due to residual air in subcutaneous implantable cardiac defibrillators is not a well‐known complication. Obtaining overpenetrated X‐rays, recognizing electrocardiogram findings, limiting blunt finger dissection, and switching to sense at another vector are techniques which might lead to avoidance of unnecessary wound exploration or device removal.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5538068
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55380682017-08-04 Inappropriate shock in a subcutaneous cardiac defibrillator due to residual air Lee, Shawn Souvaliotis, Nektarios Mehta, Davendra Suri, Ranjit Clin Case Rep Case Reports Inappropriate shock due to residual air in subcutaneous implantable cardiac defibrillators is not a well‐known complication. Obtaining overpenetrated X‐rays, recognizing electrocardiogram findings, limiting blunt finger dissection, and switching to sense at another vector are techniques which might lead to avoidance of unnecessary wound exploration or device removal. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2017-06-06 /pmc/articles/PMC5538068/ /pubmed/28781823 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ccr3.1009 Text en © 2017 The Authors. Clinical Case Reports published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Case Reports
Lee, Shawn
Souvaliotis, Nektarios
Mehta, Davendra
Suri, Ranjit
Inappropriate shock in a subcutaneous cardiac defibrillator due to residual air
title Inappropriate shock in a subcutaneous cardiac defibrillator due to residual air
title_full Inappropriate shock in a subcutaneous cardiac defibrillator due to residual air
title_fullStr Inappropriate shock in a subcutaneous cardiac defibrillator due to residual air
title_full_unstemmed Inappropriate shock in a subcutaneous cardiac defibrillator due to residual air
title_short Inappropriate shock in a subcutaneous cardiac defibrillator due to residual air
title_sort inappropriate shock in a subcutaneous cardiac defibrillator due to residual air
topic Case Reports
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5538068/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28781823
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ccr3.1009
work_keys_str_mv AT leeshawn inappropriateshockinasubcutaneouscardiacdefibrillatorduetoresidualair
AT souvaliotisnektarios inappropriateshockinasubcutaneouscardiacdefibrillatorduetoresidualair
AT mehtadavendra inappropriateshockinasubcutaneouscardiacdefibrillatorduetoresidualair
AT suriranjit inappropriateshockinasubcutaneouscardiacdefibrillatorduetoresidualair

Ejemplares similares