Cargando…
Improving satellite-based PM(2.5) estimates in China using Gaussian processes modeling in a Bayesian hierarchical setting
Using satellite-based aerosol optical depth (AOD) measurements and statistical models to estimate ground-level PM(2.5) is a promising way to fill the areas that are not covered by ground PM(2.5) monitors. The statistical models used in previous studies are primarily Linear Mixed Effects (LME) and Ge...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5539114/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28765549 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-07478-0 |
_version_ | 1783254420334575616 |
---|---|
author | Yu, Wenxi Liu, Yang Ma, Zongwei Bi, Jun |
author_facet | Yu, Wenxi Liu, Yang Ma, Zongwei Bi, Jun |
author_sort | Yu, Wenxi |
collection | PubMed |
description | Using satellite-based aerosol optical depth (AOD) measurements and statistical models to estimate ground-level PM(2.5) is a promising way to fill the areas that are not covered by ground PM(2.5) monitors. The statistical models used in previous studies are primarily Linear Mixed Effects (LME) and Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR) models. In this study, we developed a new regression model between PM(2.5) and AOD using Gaussian processes in a Bayesian hierarchical setting. Gaussian processes model the stochastic nature of the spatial random effects, where the mean surface and the covariance function is specified. The spatial stochastic process is incorporated under the Bayesian hierarchical framework to explain the variation of PM(2.5) concentrations together with other factors, such as AOD, spatial and non-spatial random effects. We evaluate the results of our model and compare them with those of other, conventional statistical models (GWR and LME) by within-sample model fitting and out-of-sample validation (cross validation, CV). The results show that our model possesses a CV result (R(2) = 0.81) that reflects higher accuracy than that of GWR and LME (0.74 and 0.48, respectively). Our results indicate that Gaussian process models have the potential to improve the accuracy of satellite-based PM(2.5) estimates. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5539114 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55391142017-08-07 Improving satellite-based PM(2.5) estimates in China using Gaussian processes modeling in a Bayesian hierarchical setting Yu, Wenxi Liu, Yang Ma, Zongwei Bi, Jun Sci Rep Article Using satellite-based aerosol optical depth (AOD) measurements and statistical models to estimate ground-level PM(2.5) is a promising way to fill the areas that are not covered by ground PM(2.5) monitors. The statistical models used in previous studies are primarily Linear Mixed Effects (LME) and Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR) models. In this study, we developed a new regression model between PM(2.5) and AOD using Gaussian processes in a Bayesian hierarchical setting. Gaussian processes model the stochastic nature of the spatial random effects, where the mean surface and the covariance function is specified. The spatial stochastic process is incorporated under the Bayesian hierarchical framework to explain the variation of PM(2.5) concentrations together with other factors, such as AOD, spatial and non-spatial random effects. We evaluate the results of our model and compare them with those of other, conventional statistical models (GWR and LME) by within-sample model fitting and out-of-sample validation (cross validation, CV). The results show that our model possesses a CV result (R(2) = 0.81) that reflects higher accuracy than that of GWR and LME (0.74 and 0.48, respectively). Our results indicate that Gaussian process models have the potential to improve the accuracy of satellite-based PM(2.5) estimates. Nature Publishing Group UK 2017-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5539114/ /pubmed/28765549 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-07478-0 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Article Yu, Wenxi Liu, Yang Ma, Zongwei Bi, Jun Improving satellite-based PM(2.5) estimates in China using Gaussian processes modeling in a Bayesian hierarchical setting |
title | Improving satellite-based PM(2.5) estimates in China using Gaussian processes modeling in a Bayesian hierarchical setting |
title_full | Improving satellite-based PM(2.5) estimates in China using Gaussian processes modeling in a Bayesian hierarchical setting |
title_fullStr | Improving satellite-based PM(2.5) estimates in China using Gaussian processes modeling in a Bayesian hierarchical setting |
title_full_unstemmed | Improving satellite-based PM(2.5) estimates in China using Gaussian processes modeling in a Bayesian hierarchical setting |
title_short | Improving satellite-based PM(2.5) estimates in China using Gaussian processes modeling in a Bayesian hierarchical setting |
title_sort | improving satellite-based pm(2.5) estimates in china using gaussian processes modeling in a bayesian hierarchical setting |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5539114/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28765549 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-07478-0 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yuwenxi improvingsatellitebasedpm25estimatesinchinausinggaussianprocessesmodelinginabayesianhierarchicalsetting AT liuyang improvingsatellitebasedpm25estimatesinchinausinggaussianprocessesmodelinginabayesianhierarchicalsetting AT mazongwei improvingsatellitebasedpm25estimatesinchinausinggaussianprocessesmodelinginabayesianhierarchicalsetting AT bijun improvingsatellitebasedpm25estimatesinchinausinggaussianprocessesmodelinginabayesianhierarchicalsetting |