Cargando…

Methodological Caveats in the Detection of Coordinated Replay between Place Cells and Grid Cells

At rest, hippocampal “place cells,” neurons with receptive fields corresponding to specific spatial locations, reactivate in a manner that reflects recently traveled trajectories. These “replay” events have been proposed as a mechanism underlying memory consolidation, or the transfer of a memory rep...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Trimper, John B., Trettel, Sean G., Hwaun, Ernie, Colgin, Laura Lee
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5539192/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28824388
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2017.00057
_version_ 1783254438478086144
author Trimper, John B.
Trettel, Sean G.
Hwaun, Ernie
Colgin, Laura Lee
author_facet Trimper, John B.
Trettel, Sean G.
Hwaun, Ernie
Colgin, Laura Lee
author_sort Trimper, John B.
collection PubMed
description At rest, hippocampal “place cells,” neurons with receptive fields corresponding to specific spatial locations, reactivate in a manner that reflects recently traveled trajectories. These “replay” events have been proposed as a mechanism underlying memory consolidation, or the transfer of a memory representation from the hippocampus to neocortical regions associated with the original sensory experience. Accordingly, it has been hypothesized that hippocampal replay of a particular experience should be accompanied by simultaneous reactivation of corresponding representations in the neocortex and in the entorhinal cortex, the primary interface between the hippocampus and the neocortex. Recent studies have reported that coordinated replay may occur between hippocampal place cells and medial entorhinal cortex grid cells, cells with multiple spatial receptive fields. Assessing replay in grid cells is problematic, however, as the cells exhibit regularly spaced spatial receptive fields in all environments and, therefore, coordinated replay between place cells and grid cells may be detected by chance. In the present report, we adapted analytical approaches utilized in recent studies of grid cell and place cell replay to determine the extent to which coordinated replay is spuriously detected between grid cells and place cells recorded from separate rats. For a subset of the employed analytical methods, coordinated replay was detected spuriously in a significant proportion of cases in which place cell replay events were randomly matched with grid cell firing epochs of equal duration. More rigorous replay evaluation procedures and minimum spike count requirements greatly reduced the amount of spurious findings. These results provide insights into aspects of place cell and grid cell activity during rest that contribute to false detection of coordinated replay. The results further emphasize the need for careful controls and rigorous methods when testing the hypothesis that place cells and grid cells exhibit coordinated replay.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5539192
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55391922017-08-18 Methodological Caveats in the Detection of Coordinated Replay between Place Cells and Grid Cells Trimper, John B. Trettel, Sean G. Hwaun, Ernie Colgin, Laura Lee Front Syst Neurosci Neuroscience At rest, hippocampal “place cells,” neurons with receptive fields corresponding to specific spatial locations, reactivate in a manner that reflects recently traveled trajectories. These “replay” events have been proposed as a mechanism underlying memory consolidation, or the transfer of a memory representation from the hippocampus to neocortical regions associated with the original sensory experience. Accordingly, it has been hypothesized that hippocampal replay of a particular experience should be accompanied by simultaneous reactivation of corresponding representations in the neocortex and in the entorhinal cortex, the primary interface between the hippocampus and the neocortex. Recent studies have reported that coordinated replay may occur between hippocampal place cells and medial entorhinal cortex grid cells, cells with multiple spatial receptive fields. Assessing replay in grid cells is problematic, however, as the cells exhibit regularly spaced spatial receptive fields in all environments and, therefore, coordinated replay between place cells and grid cells may be detected by chance. In the present report, we adapted analytical approaches utilized in recent studies of grid cell and place cell replay to determine the extent to which coordinated replay is spuriously detected between grid cells and place cells recorded from separate rats. For a subset of the employed analytical methods, coordinated replay was detected spuriously in a significant proportion of cases in which place cell replay events were randomly matched with grid cell firing epochs of equal duration. More rigorous replay evaluation procedures and minimum spike count requirements greatly reduced the amount of spurious findings. These results provide insights into aspects of place cell and grid cell activity during rest that contribute to false detection of coordinated replay. The results further emphasize the need for careful controls and rigorous methods when testing the hypothesis that place cells and grid cells exhibit coordinated replay. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5539192/ /pubmed/28824388 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2017.00057 Text en Copyright © 2017 Trimper, Trettel, Hwaun and Colgin. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Trimper, John B.
Trettel, Sean G.
Hwaun, Ernie
Colgin, Laura Lee
Methodological Caveats in the Detection of Coordinated Replay between Place Cells and Grid Cells
title Methodological Caveats in the Detection of Coordinated Replay between Place Cells and Grid Cells
title_full Methodological Caveats in the Detection of Coordinated Replay between Place Cells and Grid Cells
title_fullStr Methodological Caveats in the Detection of Coordinated Replay between Place Cells and Grid Cells
title_full_unstemmed Methodological Caveats in the Detection of Coordinated Replay between Place Cells and Grid Cells
title_short Methodological Caveats in the Detection of Coordinated Replay between Place Cells and Grid Cells
title_sort methodological caveats in the detection of coordinated replay between place cells and grid cells
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5539192/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28824388
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2017.00057
work_keys_str_mv AT trimperjohnb methodologicalcaveatsinthedetectionofcoordinatedreplaybetweenplacecellsandgridcells
AT trettelseang methodologicalcaveatsinthedetectionofcoordinatedreplaybetweenplacecellsandgridcells
AT hwaunernie methodologicalcaveatsinthedetectionofcoordinatedreplaybetweenplacecellsandgridcells
AT colginlauralee methodologicalcaveatsinthedetectionofcoordinatedreplaybetweenplacecellsandgridcells