Cargando…
The Value of Multidisciplinary Team Meetings for Patients with Gastrointestinal Malignancies: A Systematic Review
INTRODUCTION: The incidence of gastrointestinal (GI) cancer is rising and most patients with GI malignancies are discussed by a multidisciplinary team (MDT). We performed a systematic review to assess whether MDTs for patients with GI malignancies can correctly change diagnosis, tumor stage and subs...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5539280/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28337661 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-017-5833-3 |
_version_ | 1783254459104624640 |
---|---|
author | Basta, Yara L. Bolle, Sifra Fockens, Paul Tytgat, Kristien M. A. J. |
author_facet | Basta, Yara L. Bolle, Sifra Fockens, Paul Tytgat, Kristien M. A. J. |
author_sort | Basta, Yara L. |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The incidence of gastrointestinal (GI) cancer is rising and most patients with GI malignancies are discussed by a multidisciplinary team (MDT). We performed a systematic review to assess whether MDTs for patients with GI malignancies can correctly change diagnosis, tumor stage and subsequent treatment plan, and whether the treatment plan was implemented. METHODS: We performed a systematic review according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We conducted a search of the PubMed, MEDLINE and EMBASE electronic databases, and included studies relating to adults with a GI malignancy discussed by an MDT prior to the start of treatment which described a change of initial diagnosis, stage or treatment plan. Two researchers independently evaluated all retrieved titles and abstracts from the abovementioned databases. RESULTS: Overall, 16 studies were included; the study quality was rated as fair. Four studies reported that MDTs changed the diagnoses formulated by individual physicians in 18.4–26.9% of evaluated cases; two studies reported that MDTs formulated an accurate diagnosis in 89 and 93.5% of evaluated cases, respectively; nine studies described that the treatment plan was altered in 23.0–41.7% of evaluated cases; and four studies found that MDT decisions were implemented in 90–100% of evaluated cases. The reasons for altering a treatment plan included the patient’s wishes, and comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS: MDT meetings for patients with a GI malignancy are responsible for changes in diagnoses and management in a significant number of patients. Treatment plans formulated by MDTs are implemented in 90–100% of discussed patients. All patients with a GI malignancy should be discussed by an MDT. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1245/s10434-017-5833-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5539280 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55392802017-08-17 The Value of Multidisciplinary Team Meetings for Patients with Gastrointestinal Malignancies: A Systematic Review Basta, Yara L. Bolle, Sifra Fockens, Paul Tytgat, Kristien M. A. J. Ann Surg Oncol Gastrointestinal Oncology INTRODUCTION: The incidence of gastrointestinal (GI) cancer is rising and most patients with GI malignancies are discussed by a multidisciplinary team (MDT). We performed a systematic review to assess whether MDTs for patients with GI malignancies can correctly change diagnosis, tumor stage and subsequent treatment plan, and whether the treatment plan was implemented. METHODS: We performed a systematic review according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We conducted a search of the PubMed, MEDLINE and EMBASE electronic databases, and included studies relating to adults with a GI malignancy discussed by an MDT prior to the start of treatment which described a change of initial diagnosis, stage or treatment plan. Two researchers independently evaluated all retrieved titles and abstracts from the abovementioned databases. RESULTS: Overall, 16 studies were included; the study quality was rated as fair. Four studies reported that MDTs changed the diagnoses formulated by individual physicians in 18.4–26.9% of evaluated cases; two studies reported that MDTs formulated an accurate diagnosis in 89 and 93.5% of evaluated cases, respectively; nine studies described that the treatment plan was altered in 23.0–41.7% of evaluated cases; and four studies found that MDT decisions were implemented in 90–100% of evaluated cases. The reasons for altering a treatment plan included the patient’s wishes, and comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS: MDT meetings for patients with a GI malignancy are responsible for changes in diagnoses and management in a significant number of patients. Treatment plans formulated by MDTs are implemented in 90–100% of discussed patients. All patients with a GI malignancy should be discussed by an MDT. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1245/s10434-017-5833-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2017-03-23 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5539280/ /pubmed/28337661 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-017-5833-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. |
spellingShingle | Gastrointestinal Oncology Basta, Yara L. Bolle, Sifra Fockens, Paul Tytgat, Kristien M. A. J. The Value of Multidisciplinary Team Meetings for Patients with Gastrointestinal Malignancies: A Systematic Review |
title | The Value of Multidisciplinary Team Meetings for Patients with Gastrointestinal Malignancies: A Systematic Review |
title_full | The Value of Multidisciplinary Team Meetings for Patients with Gastrointestinal Malignancies: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | The Value of Multidisciplinary Team Meetings for Patients with Gastrointestinal Malignancies: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | The Value of Multidisciplinary Team Meetings for Patients with Gastrointestinal Malignancies: A Systematic Review |
title_short | The Value of Multidisciplinary Team Meetings for Patients with Gastrointestinal Malignancies: A Systematic Review |
title_sort | value of multidisciplinary team meetings for patients with gastrointestinal malignancies: a systematic review |
topic | Gastrointestinal Oncology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5539280/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28337661 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-017-5833-3 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bastayaral thevalueofmultidisciplinaryteammeetingsforpatientswithgastrointestinalmalignanciesasystematicreview AT bollesifra thevalueofmultidisciplinaryteammeetingsforpatientswithgastrointestinalmalignanciesasystematicreview AT fockenspaul thevalueofmultidisciplinaryteammeetingsforpatientswithgastrointestinalmalignanciesasystematicreview AT tytgatkristienmaj thevalueofmultidisciplinaryteammeetingsforpatientswithgastrointestinalmalignanciesasystematicreview AT bastayaral valueofmultidisciplinaryteammeetingsforpatientswithgastrointestinalmalignanciesasystematicreview AT bollesifra valueofmultidisciplinaryteammeetingsforpatientswithgastrointestinalmalignanciesasystematicreview AT fockenspaul valueofmultidisciplinaryteammeetingsforpatientswithgastrointestinalmalignanciesasystematicreview AT tytgatkristienmaj valueofmultidisciplinaryteammeetingsforpatientswithgastrointestinalmalignanciesasystematicreview |