Cargando…

The Value of Multidisciplinary Team Meetings for Patients with Gastrointestinal Malignancies: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION: The incidence of gastrointestinal (GI) cancer is rising and most patients with GI malignancies are discussed by a multidisciplinary team (MDT). We performed a systematic review to assess whether MDTs for patients with GI malignancies can correctly change diagnosis, tumor stage and subs...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Basta, Yara L., Bolle, Sifra, Fockens, Paul, Tytgat, Kristien M. A. J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5539280/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28337661
http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-017-5833-3
_version_ 1783254459104624640
author Basta, Yara L.
Bolle, Sifra
Fockens, Paul
Tytgat, Kristien M. A. J.
author_facet Basta, Yara L.
Bolle, Sifra
Fockens, Paul
Tytgat, Kristien M. A. J.
author_sort Basta, Yara L.
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: The incidence of gastrointestinal (GI) cancer is rising and most patients with GI malignancies are discussed by a multidisciplinary team (MDT). We performed a systematic review to assess whether MDTs for patients with GI malignancies can correctly change diagnosis, tumor stage and subsequent treatment plan, and whether the treatment plan was implemented. METHODS: We performed a systematic review according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We conducted a search of the PubMed, MEDLINE and EMBASE electronic databases, and included studies relating to adults with a GI malignancy discussed by an MDT prior to the start of treatment which described a change of initial diagnosis, stage or treatment plan. Two researchers independently evaluated all retrieved titles and abstracts from the abovementioned databases. RESULTS: Overall, 16 studies were included; the study quality was rated as fair. Four studies reported that MDTs changed the diagnoses formulated by individual physicians in 18.4–26.9% of evaluated cases; two studies reported that MDTs formulated an accurate diagnosis in 89 and 93.5% of evaluated cases, respectively; nine studies described that the treatment plan was altered in 23.0–41.7% of evaluated cases; and four studies found that MDT decisions were implemented in 90–100% of evaluated cases. The reasons for altering a treatment plan included the patient’s wishes, and comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS: MDT meetings for patients with a GI malignancy are responsible for changes in diagnoses and management in a significant number of patients. Treatment plans formulated by MDTs are implemented in 90–100% of discussed patients. All patients with a GI malignancy should be discussed by an MDT. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1245/s10434-017-5833-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5539280
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55392802017-08-17 The Value of Multidisciplinary Team Meetings for Patients with Gastrointestinal Malignancies: A Systematic Review Basta, Yara L. Bolle, Sifra Fockens, Paul Tytgat, Kristien M. A. J. Ann Surg Oncol Gastrointestinal Oncology INTRODUCTION: The incidence of gastrointestinal (GI) cancer is rising and most patients with GI malignancies are discussed by a multidisciplinary team (MDT). We performed a systematic review to assess whether MDTs for patients with GI malignancies can correctly change diagnosis, tumor stage and subsequent treatment plan, and whether the treatment plan was implemented. METHODS: We performed a systematic review according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines. We conducted a search of the PubMed, MEDLINE and EMBASE electronic databases, and included studies relating to adults with a GI malignancy discussed by an MDT prior to the start of treatment which described a change of initial diagnosis, stage or treatment plan. Two researchers independently evaluated all retrieved titles and abstracts from the abovementioned databases. RESULTS: Overall, 16 studies were included; the study quality was rated as fair. Four studies reported that MDTs changed the diagnoses formulated by individual physicians in 18.4–26.9% of evaluated cases; two studies reported that MDTs formulated an accurate diagnosis in 89 and 93.5% of evaluated cases, respectively; nine studies described that the treatment plan was altered in 23.0–41.7% of evaluated cases; and four studies found that MDT decisions were implemented in 90–100% of evaluated cases. The reasons for altering a treatment plan included the patient’s wishes, and comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS: MDT meetings for patients with a GI malignancy are responsible for changes in diagnoses and management in a significant number of patients. Treatment plans formulated by MDTs are implemented in 90–100% of discussed patients. All patients with a GI malignancy should be discussed by an MDT. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1245/s10434-017-5833-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer International Publishing 2017-03-23 2017 /pmc/articles/PMC5539280/ /pubmed/28337661 http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-017-5833-3 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
spellingShingle Gastrointestinal Oncology
Basta, Yara L.
Bolle, Sifra
Fockens, Paul
Tytgat, Kristien M. A. J.
The Value of Multidisciplinary Team Meetings for Patients with Gastrointestinal Malignancies: A Systematic Review
title The Value of Multidisciplinary Team Meetings for Patients with Gastrointestinal Malignancies: A Systematic Review
title_full The Value of Multidisciplinary Team Meetings for Patients with Gastrointestinal Malignancies: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr The Value of Multidisciplinary Team Meetings for Patients with Gastrointestinal Malignancies: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed The Value of Multidisciplinary Team Meetings for Patients with Gastrointestinal Malignancies: A Systematic Review
title_short The Value of Multidisciplinary Team Meetings for Patients with Gastrointestinal Malignancies: A Systematic Review
title_sort value of multidisciplinary team meetings for patients with gastrointestinal malignancies: a systematic review
topic Gastrointestinal Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5539280/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28337661
http://dx.doi.org/10.1245/s10434-017-5833-3
work_keys_str_mv AT bastayaral thevalueofmultidisciplinaryteammeetingsforpatientswithgastrointestinalmalignanciesasystematicreview
AT bollesifra thevalueofmultidisciplinaryteammeetingsforpatientswithgastrointestinalmalignanciesasystematicreview
AT fockenspaul thevalueofmultidisciplinaryteammeetingsforpatientswithgastrointestinalmalignanciesasystematicreview
AT tytgatkristienmaj thevalueofmultidisciplinaryteammeetingsforpatientswithgastrointestinalmalignanciesasystematicreview
AT bastayaral valueofmultidisciplinaryteammeetingsforpatientswithgastrointestinalmalignanciesasystematicreview
AT bollesifra valueofmultidisciplinaryteammeetingsforpatientswithgastrointestinalmalignanciesasystematicreview
AT fockenspaul valueofmultidisciplinaryteammeetingsforpatientswithgastrointestinalmalignanciesasystematicreview
AT tytgatkristienmaj valueofmultidisciplinaryteammeetingsforpatientswithgastrointestinalmalignanciesasystematicreview