Cargando…

The available evidence on demineralised bone matrix in trauma and orthopaedic surgery: A systematic review

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this systematic literature review was to assess the clinical level of evidence of commercially available demineralised bone matrix (DBM) products for their use in trauma and orthopaedic related surgery. METHODS: A total of 17 DBM products were used as search terms in two avail...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: van der Stok, J., Hartholt, K. A., Schoenmakers, D. A. L., Arts, J. J. C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5539308/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28733366
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.67.BJR-2017-0027.R1
_version_ 1783254465680244736
author van der Stok, J.
Hartholt, K. A.
Schoenmakers, D. A. L.
Arts, J. J. C.
author_facet van der Stok, J.
Hartholt, K. A.
Schoenmakers, D. A. L.
Arts, J. J. C.
author_sort van der Stok, J.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: The aim of this systematic literature review was to assess the clinical level of evidence of commercially available demineralised bone matrix (DBM) products for their use in trauma and orthopaedic related surgery. METHODS: A total of 17 DBM products were used as search terms in two available databases: Embase and PubMed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses statement. All articles that reported the clinical use of a DBM-product in trauma and orthopaedic related surgery were included. RESULTS: The literature search resulted in 823 manuscripts of which 64 manuscripts met the final inclusion criteria. The included manuscripts consisted of four randomised controlled trials (level I), eight cohort studies (level III) and 49 case-series (level IV). No clinical studies were found for ten DBM products, and most DBM products were only used in combination with other grafting materials. DBM products were most extensively investigated in spinal surgery, showing limited level I evidence that supports the use Grafton DBM (Osteotech, Eatontown, New Jersey) as a bone graft extender in posterolateral lumbar fusion surgery. DBM products are not thoroughly investigated in trauma surgery, showing mainly level IV evidence that supports the use of Allomatrix (Wright Medical, London, United Kingdom), DBX (DePuy Synthes, Zuchwil, Switzerland), Grafton DBM, or OrthoBlast (Citagenix Laval, Canada) as bone graft extenders. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical level of evidence that supports the use of DBM in trauma and orthopaedic surgery is limited and consists mainly of poor quality and retrospective case-series. More prospective, randomised controlled trials are needed to understand the clinical effect and impact of DBM in trauma and orthopaedic surgery. Cite this article: J. van der Stok, K. A. Hartholt, D. A. L. Schoenmakers, J. J. C. Arts. The available evidence on demineralised bone matrix in trauma and orthopaedic surgery: A systemati c review. Bone Joint Res 2017;6:423–432. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.67.BJR-2017-0027.R1.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5539308
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55393082017-08-15 The available evidence on demineralised bone matrix in trauma and orthopaedic surgery: A systematic review van der Stok, J. Hartholt, K. A. Schoenmakers, D. A. L. Arts, J. J. C. Bone Joint Res Trauma OBJECTIVES: The aim of this systematic literature review was to assess the clinical level of evidence of commercially available demineralised bone matrix (DBM) products for their use in trauma and orthopaedic related surgery. METHODS: A total of 17 DBM products were used as search terms in two available databases: Embase and PubMed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses statement. All articles that reported the clinical use of a DBM-product in trauma and orthopaedic related surgery were included. RESULTS: The literature search resulted in 823 manuscripts of which 64 manuscripts met the final inclusion criteria. The included manuscripts consisted of four randomised controlled trials (level I), eight cohort studies (level III) and 49 case-series (level IV). No clinical studies were found for ten DBM products, and most DBM products were only used in combination with other grafting materials. DBM products were most extensively investigated in spinal surgery, showing limited level I evidence that supports the use Grafton DBM (Osteotech, Eatontown, New Jersey) as a bone graft extender in posterolateral lumbar fusion surgery. DBM products are not thoroughly investigated in trauma surgery, showing mainly level IV evidence that supports the use of Allomatrix (Wright Medical, London, United Kingdom), DBX (DePuy Synthes, Zuchwil, Switzerland), Grafton DBM, or OrthoBlast (Citagenix Laval, Canada) as bone graft extenders. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical level of evidence that supports the use of DBM in trauma and orthopaedic surgery is limited and consists mainly of poor quality and retrospective case-series. More prospective, randomised controlled trials are needed to understand the clinical effect and impact of DBM in trauma and orthopaedic surgery. Cite this article: J. van der Stok, K. A. Hartholt, D. A. L. Schoenmakers, J. J. C. Arts. The available evidence on demineralised bone matrix in trauma and orthopaedic surgery: A systemati c review. Bone Joint Res 2017;6:423–432. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.67.BJR-2017-0027.R1. 2017-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5539308/ /pubmed/28733366 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.67.BJR-2017-0027.R1 Text en © 2017 Arts et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attributions licence (CC-BY-NC), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, but not for commercial gain, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Trauma
van der Stok, J.
Hartholt, K. A.
Schoenmakers, D. A. L.
Arts, J. J. C.
The available evidence on demineralised bone matrix in trauma and orthopaedic surgery: A systematic review
title The available evidence on demineralised bone matrix in trauma and orthopaedic surgery: A systematic review
title_full The available evidence on demineralised bone matrix in trauma and orthopaedic surgery: A systematic review
title_fullStr The available evidence on demineralised bone matrix in trauma and orthopaedic surgery: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed The available evidence on demineralised bone matrix in trauma and orthopaedic surgery: A systematic review
title_short The available evidence on demineralised bone matrix in trauma and orthopaedic surgery: A systematic review
title_sort available evidence on demineralised bone matrix in trauma and orthopaedic surgery: a systematic review
topic Trauma
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5539308/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28733366
http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.67.BJR-2017-0027.R1
work_keys_str_mv AT vanderstokj theavailableevidenceondemineralisedbonematrixintraumaandorthopaedicsurgeryasystematicreview
AT hartholtka theavailableevidenceondemineralisedbonematrixintraumaandorthopaedicsurgeryasystematicreview
AT schoenmakersdal theavailableevidenceondemineralisedbonematrixintraumaandorthopaedicsurgeryasystematicreview
AT artsjjc theavailableevidenceondemineralisedbonematrixintraumaandorthopaedicsurgeryasystematicreview
AT vanderstokj availableevidenceondemineralisedbonematrixintraumaandorthopaedicsurgeryasystematicreview
AT hartholtka availableevidenceondemineralisedbonematrixintraumaandorthopaedicsurgeryasystematicreview
AT schoenmakersdal availableevidenceondemineralisedbonematrixintraumaandorthopaedicsurgeryasystematicreview
AT artsjjc availableevidenceondemineralisedbonematrixintraumaandorthopaedicsurgeryasystematicreview