Cargando…
The available evidence on demineralised bone matrix in trauma and orthopaedic surgery: A systematic review
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this systematic literature review was to assess the clinical level of evidence of commercially available demineralised bone matrix (DBM) products for their use in trauma and orthopaedic related surgery. METHODS: A total of 17 DBM products were used as search terms in two avail...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5539308/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28733366 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.67.BJR-2017-0027.R1 |
_version_ | 1783254465680244736 |
---|---|
author | van der Stok, J. Hartholt, K. A. Schoenmakers, D. A. L. Arts, J. J. C. |
author_facet | van der Stok, J. Hartholt, K. A. Schoenmakers, D. A. L. Arts, J. J. C. |
author_sort | van der Stok, J. |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: The aim of this systematic literature review was to assess the clinical level of evidence of commercially available demineralised bone matrix (DBM) products for their use in trauma and orthopaedic related surgery. METHODS: A total of 17 DBM products were used as search terms in two available databases: Embase and PubMed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses statement. All articles that reported the clinical use of a DBM-product in trauma and orthopaedic related surgery were included. RESULTS: The literature search resulted in 823 manuscripts of which 64 manuscripts met the final inclusion criteria. The included manuscripts consisted of four randomised controlled trials (level I), eight cohort studies (level III) and 49 case-series (level IV). No clinical studies were found for ten DBM products, and most DBM products were only used in combination with other grafting materials. DBM products were most extensively investigated in spinal surgery, showing limited level I evidence that supports the use Grafton DBM (Osteotech, Eatontown, New Jersey) as a bone graft extender in posterolateral lumbar fusion surgery. DBM products are not thoroughly investigated in trauma surgery, showing mainly level IV evidence that supports the use of Allomatrix (Wright Medical, London, United Kingdom), DBX (DePuy Synthes, Zuchwil, Switzerland), Grafton DBM, or OrthoBlast (Citagenix Laval, Canada) as bone graft extenders. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical level of evidence that supports the use of DBM in trauma and orthopaedic surgery is limited and consists mainly of poor quality and retrospective case-series. More prospective, randomised controlled trials are needed to understand the clinical effect and impact of DBM in trauma and orthopaedic surgery. Cite this article: J. van der Stok, K. A. Hartholt, D. A. L. Schoenmakers, J. J. C. Arts. The available evidence on demineralised bone matrix in trauma and orthopaedic surgery: A systemati c review. Bone Joint Res 2017;6:423–432. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.67.BJR-2017-0027.R1. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5539308 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55393082017-08-15 The available evidence on demineralised bone matrix in trauma and orthopaedic surgery: A systematic review van der Stok, J. Hartholt, K. A. Schoenmakers, D. A. L. Arts, J. J. C. Bone Joint Res Trauma OBJECTIVES: The aim of this systematic literature review was to assess the clinical level of evidence of commercially available demineralised bone matrix (DBM) products for their use in trauma and orthopaedic related surgery. METHODS: A total of 17 DBM products were used as search terms in two available databases: Embase and PubMed according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta Analyses statement. All articles that reported the clinical use of a DBM-product in trauma and orthopaedic related surgery were included. RESULTS: The literature search resulted in 823 manuscripts of which 64 manuscripts met the final inclusion criteria. The included manuscripts consisted of four randomised controlled trials (level I), eight cohort studies (level III) and 49 case-series (level IV). No clinical studies were found for ten DBM products, and most DBM products were only used in combination with other grafting materials. DBM products were most extensively investigated in spinal surgery, showing limited level I evidence that supports the use Grafton DBM (Osteotech, Eatontown, New Jersey) as a bone graft extender in posterolateral lumbar fusion surgery. DBM products are not thoroughly investigated in trauma surgery, showing mainly level IV evidence that supports the use of Allomatrix (Wright Medical, London, United Kingdom), DBX (DePuy Synthes, Zuchwil, Switzerland), Grafton DBM, or OrthoBlast (Citagenix Laval, Canada) as bone graft extenders. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical level of evidence that supports the use of DBM in trauma and orthopaedic surgery is limited and consists mainly of poor quality and retrospective case-series. More prospective, randomised controlled trials are needed to understand the clinical effect and impact of DBM in trauma and orthopaedic surgery. Cite this article: J. van der Stok, K. A. Hartholt, D. A. L. Schoenmakers, J. J. C. Arts. The available evidence on demineralised bone matrix in trauma and orthopaedic surgery: A systemati c review. Bone Joint Res 2017;6:423–432. DOI: 10.1302/2046-3758.67.BJR-2017-0027.R1. 2017-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5539308/ /pubmed/28733366 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.67.BJR-2017-0027.R1 Text en © 2017 Arts et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attributions licence (CC-BY-NC), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, but not for commercial gain, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Trauma van der Stok, J. Hartholt, K. A. Schoenmakers, D. A. L. Arts, J. J. C. The available evidence on demineralised bone matrix in trauma and orthopaedic surgery: A systematic review |
title | The available evidence on demineralised bone matrix in trauma and orthopaedic surgery: A systematic review |
title_full | The available evidence on demineralised bone matrix in trauma and orthopaedic surgery: A systematic review |
title_fullStr | The available evidence on demineralised bone matrix in trauma and orthopaedic surgery: A systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed | The available evidence on demineralised bone matrix in trauma and orthopaedic surgery: A systematic review |
title_short | The available evidence on demineralised bone matrix in trauma and orthopaedic surgery: A systematic review |
title_sort | available evidence on demineralised bone matrix in trauma and orthopaedic surgery: a systematic review |
topic | Trauma |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5539308/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28733366 http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.67.BJR-2017-0027.R1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT vanderstokj theavailableevidenceondemineralisedbonematrixintraumaandorthopaedicsurgeryasystematicreview AT hartholtka theavailableevidenceondemineralisedbonematrixintraumaandorthopaedicsurgeryasystematicreview AT schoenmakersdal theavailableevidenceondemineralisedbonematrixintraumaandorthopaedicsurgeryasystematicreview AT artsjjc theavailableevidenceondemineralisedbonematrixintraumaandorthopaedicsurgeryasystematicreview AT vanderstokj availableevidenceondemineralisedbonematrixintraumaandorthopaedicsurgeryasystematicreview AT hartholtka availableevidenceondemineralisedbonematrixintraumaandorthopaedicsurgeryasystematicreview AT schoenmakersdal availableevidenceondemineralisedbonematrixintraumaandorthopaedicsurgeryasystematicreview AT artsjjc availableevidenceondemineralisedbonematrixintraumaandorthopaedicsurgeryasystematicreview |