Cargando…
Fungal Diversity in Tomato Rhizosphere Soil under Conventional and Desert Farming Systems
This study examined fungal diversity and composition in conventional (CM) and desert farming (DE) systems in Oman. Fungal diversity in the rhizosphere of tomato was assessed using 454-pyrosequencing and culture-based techniques. Both techniques produced variable results in terms of fungal diversity,...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5539375/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28824590 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01462 |
_version_ | 1783254477357187072 |
---|---|
author | Kazerooni, Elham A. Maharachchikumbura, Sajeewa S. N. Rethinasamy, Velazhahan Al-Mahrouqi, Hamed Al-Sadi, Abdullah M. |
author_facet | Kazerooni, Elham A. Maharachchikumbura, Sajeewa S. N. Rethinasamy, Velazhahan Al-Mahrouqi, Hamed Al-Sadi, Abdullah M. |
author_sort | Kazerooni, Elham A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study examined fungal diversity and composition in conventional (CM) and desert farming (DE) systems in Oman. Fungal diversity in the rhizosphere of tomato was assessed using 454-pyrosequencing and culture-based techniques. Both techniques produced variable results in terms of fungal diversity, with 25% of the fungal classes shared between the two techniques. In addition, pyrosequencing recovered more taxa compared to direct plating. These findings could be attributed to the ability of pyrosequencing to recover taxa that cannot grow or are slow growing on culture media. Both techniques showed that fungal diversity in the conventional farm was comparable to that in the desert farm. However, the composition of fungal classes and taxa in the two farming systems were different. Pyrosequencing revealed that Microsporidetes and Dothideomycetes are the two most common fungal classes in CM and DE, respectively. However, the culture-based technique revealed that Eurotiomycetes was the most abundant class in both farming systems and some classes, such as Microsporidetes, were not detected by the culture-based technique. Although some plant pathogens (e.g., Pythium or Fusarium) were detected in the rhizosphere of tomato, the majority of fungal species in the rhizosphere of tomato were saprophytes. Our study shows that the cultivation system may have an impact on fungal diversity. The factors which affected fungal diversity in both farms are discussed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5539375 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55393752017-08-18 Fungal Diversity in Tomato Rhizosphere Soil under Conventional and Desert Farming Systems Kazerooni, Elham A. Maharachchikumbura, Sajeewa S. N. Rethinasamy, Velazhahan Al-Mahrouqi, Hamed Al-Sadi, Abdullah M. Front Microbiol Microbiology This study examined fungal diversity and composition in conventional (CM) and desert farming (DE) systems in Oman. Fungal diversity in the rhizosphere of tomato was assessed using 454-pyrosequencing and culture-based techniques. Both techniques produced variable results in terms of fungal diversity, with 25% of the fungal classes shared between the two techniques. In addition, pyrosequencing recovered more taxa compared to direct plating. These findings could be attributed to the ability of pyrosequencing to recover taxa that cannot grow or are slow growing on culture media. Both techniques showed that fungal diversity in the conventional farm was comparable to that in the desert farm. However, the composition of fungal classes and taxa in the two farming systems were different. Pyrosequencing revealed that Microsporidetes and Dothideomycetes are the two most common fungal classes in CM and DE, respectively. However, the culture-based technique revealed that Eurotiomycetes was the most abundant class in both farming systems and some classes, such as Microsporidetes, were not detected by the culture-based technique. Although some plant pathogens (e.g., Pythium or Fusarium) were detected in the rhizosphere of tomato, the majority of fungal species in the rhizosphere of tomato were saprophytes. Our study shows that the cultivation system may have an impact on fungal diversity. The factors which affected fungal diversity in both farms are discussed. Frontiers Media S.A. 2017-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5539375/ /pubmed/28824590 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01462 Text en Copyright © 2017 Kazerooni, Maharachchikumbura, Rethinasamy, Al-Mahrouqi and Al-Sadi. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Microbiology Kazerooni, Elham A. Maharachchikumbura, Sajeewa S. N. Rethinasamy, Velazhahan Al-Mahrouqi, Hamed Al-Sadi, Abdullah M. Fungal Diversity in Tomato Rhizosphere Soil under Conventional and Desert Farming Systems |
title | Fungal Diversity in Tomato Rhizosphere Soil under Conventional and Desert Farming Systems |
title_full | Fungal Diversity in Tomato Rhizosphere Soil under Conventional and Desert Farming Systems |
title_fullStr | Fungal Diversity in Tomato Rhizosphere Soil under Conventional and Desert Farming Systems |
title_full_unstemmed | Fungal Diversity in Tomato Rhizosphere Soil under Conventional and Desert Farming Systems |
title_short | Fungal Diversity in Tomato Rhizosphere Soil under Conventional and Desert Farming Systems |
title_sort | fungal diversity in tomato rhizosphere soil under conventional and desert farming systems |
topic | Microbiology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5539375/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28824590 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2017.01462 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kazeroonielhama fungaldiversityintomatorhizospheresoilunderconventionalanddesertfarmingsystems AT maharachchikumburasajeewasn fungaldiversityintomatorhizospheresoilunderconventionalanddesertfarmingsystems AT rethinasamyvelazhahan fungaldiversityintomatorhizospheresoilunderconventionalanddesertfarmingsystems AT almahrouqihamed fungaldiversityintomatorhizospheresoilunderconventionalanddesertfarmingsystems AT alsadiabdullahm fungaldiversityintomatorhizospheresoilunderconventionalanddesertfarmingsystems |