Cargando…

Association between MPO-463G > A polymorphism and cancer risk: evidence from 60 case-control studies

BACKGROUND: Though a number of studies have been conducted to explore the association between myeloperoxidase (MPO)-463G > A polymorphism and cancer risk, the results remain inconsistent. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to derive a more systematic estimation of this relationship. METHOD:...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Wen-jun, Wang, Ming-yue, Pan, Fu-ze, Shi, Chen, Cen, Hong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5539634/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28764808
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-017-1183-7
_version_ 1783254516345339904
author Yang, Wen-jun
Wang, Ming-yue
Pan, Fu-ze
Shi, Chen
Cen, Hong
author_facet Yang, Wen-jun
Wang, Ming-yue
Pan, Fu-ze
Shi, Chen
Cen, Hong
author_sort Yang, Wen-jun
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Though a number of studies have been conducted to explore the association between myeloperoxidase (MPO)-463G > A polymorphism and cancer risk, the results remain inconsistent. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to derive a more systematic estimation of this relationship. METHOD: Relevant studies were searched by PubMed, EMBASE, CNKI, Google Scholar, Ovid, and Cochrane library prior to December 2015. The strength of the association between MPO-463G > A polymorphism and cancer risk was estimated by odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence interval (95%CI). Cumulative analysis was used to evaluate the stability of results through time. RESULTS: The current analysis consisted of 16,858 cases and 21,756 controls from 60 studies. Pooled results showed that MPO-463G > A polymorphism were associated with the overall decreased cancer susceptibility in all the genetic models included in this study (additive model: OR = 0.84, 95%CI = 0.76–0.94; allele genetic model: OR = 0.90, 95%CI = 0.840–0.954; recessive genetic model: OR = 0.89, 95%CI = 0.83–0.95). However, in the stratified analysis of cancer type, the significant results were only found in lung cancer (dominant model: OR = 0.93, 95%CI = 0.87–0.99) and digestive system cancer groups (dominant model: OR = 0.67 0.53–0.84; allele frequency model = 0.71, 95%CI = 0.57–0.87), but not in the blood system cancer or breast cancer group. When we further stratified the digestive system cancer group into digestive tract and digestive gland cancer groups, results showed a significant association between allele A of MPO-463G > A and digestive gland cancer in all the genetic models (allele frequency model: OR = 0.63, 95%CI = 0.40–0.99; additive model: OR = 0.41, 95%CI = 0.23–0.73; recessive model: OR = 0.51, 95%CI = 0.29–0.89; dominant model: OR = 0.58, 95%CI = 0.35–0.96), digestive tract cancers in allele frequency model (OR = 0.75, 95%CI = 0.59–0.95), and dominant model (OR = 0.72, 95%CI = 0.56–0.92). When stratified by ethnicity, results demonstrated that the genotype A might be a protect factor for both Caucasians and Asians. In group analysis according to source of controls, significant results were found in population from hospital in all the genetic models. In cumulative analysis, result of allele contrast showed a declining trend and increasingly narrower 95% overall, while the inclination toward non-significant association with lung cancer risk. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis suggested that MPO-463G > A polymorphism was associated with the overall reduced cancer susceptibility significantly. It might be a more reliable predictor of digestive system cancer instead of lung cancer, blood system cancer, and breast cancer. In cumulative analysis, the stable trend indicated that evidence was sufficient to show the association between MPO-463G > A polymorphism and cancer risk.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5539634
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55396342017-08-03 Association between MPO-463G > A polymorphism and cancer risk: evidence from 60 case-control studies Yang, Wen-jun Wang, Ming-yue Pan, Fu-ze Shi, Chen Cen, Hong World J Surg Oncol Review BACKGROUND: Though a number of studies have been conducted to explore the association between myeloperoxidase (MPO)-463G > A polymorphism and cancer risk, the results remain inconsistent. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to derive a more systematic estimation of this relationship. METHOD: Relevant studies were searched by PubMed, EMBASE, CNKI, Google Scholar, Ovid, and Cochrane library prior to December 2015. The strength of the association between MPO-463G > A polymorphism and cancer risk was estimated by odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence interval (95%CI). Cumulative analysis was used to evaluate the stability of results through time. RESULTS: The current analysis consisted of 16,858 cases and 21,756 controls from 60 studies. Pooled results showed that MPO-463G > A polymorphism were associated with the overall decreased cancer susceptibility in all the genetic models included in this study (additive model: OR = 0.84, 95%CI = 0.76–0.94; allele genetic model: OR = 0.90, 95%CI = 0.840–0.954; recessive genetic model: OR = 0.89, 95%CI = 0.83–0.95). However, in the stratified analysis of cancer type, the significant results were only found in lung cancer (dominant model: OR = 0.93, 95%CI = 0.87–0.99) and digestive system cancer groups (dominant model: OR = 0.67 0.53–0.84; allele frequency model = 0.71, 95%CI = 0.57–0.87), but not in the blood system cancer or breast cancer group. When we further stratified the digestive system cancer group into digestive tract and digestive gland cancer groups, results showed a significant association between allele A of MPO-463G > A and digestive gland cancer in all the genetic models (allele frequency model: OR = 0.63, 95%CI = 0.40–0.99; additive model: OR = 0.41, 95%CI = 0.23–0.73; recessive model: OR = 0.51, 95%CI = 0.29–0.89; dominant model: OR = 0.58, 95%CI = 0.35–0.96), digestive tract cancers in allele frequency model (OR = 0.75, 95%CI = 0.59–0.95), and dominant model (OR = 0.72, 95%CI = 0.56–0.92). When stratified by ethnicity, results demonstrated that the genotype A might be a protect factor for both Caucasians and Asians. In group analysis according to source of controls, significant results were found in population from hospital in all the genetic models. In cumulative analysis, result of allele contrast showed a declining trend and increasingly narrower 95% overall, while the inclination toward non-significant association with lung cancer risk. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis suggested that MPO-463G > A polymorphism was associated with the overall reduced cancer susceptibility significantly. It might be a more reliable predictor of digestive system cancer instead of lung cancer, blood system cancer, and breast cancer. In cumulative analysis, the stable trend indicated that evidence was sufficient to show the association between MPO-463G > A polymorphism and cancer risk. BioMed Central 2017-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5539634/ /pubmed/28764808 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-017-1183-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Review
Yang, Wen-jun
Wang, Ming-yue
Pan, Fu-ze
Shi, Chen
Cen, Hong
Association between MPO-463G > A polymorphism and cancer risk: evidence from 60 case-control studies
title Association between MPO-463G > A polymorphism and cancer risk: evidence from 60 case-control studies
title_full Association between MPO-463G > A polymorphism and cancer risk: evidence from 60 case-control studies
title_fullStr Association between MPO-463G > A polymorphism and cancer risk: evidence from 60 case-control studies
title_full_unstemmed Association between MPO-463G > A polymorphism and cancer risk: evidence from 60 case-control studies
title_short Association between MPO-463G > A polymorphism and cancer risk: evidence from 60 case-control studies
title_sort association between mpo-463g > a polymorphism and cancer risk: evidence from 60 case-control studies
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5539634/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28764808
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12957-017-1183-7
work_keys_str_mv AT yangwenjun associationbetweenmpo463gapolymorphismandcancerriskevidencefrom60casecontrolstudies
AT wangmingyue associationbetweenmpo463gapolymorphismandcancerriskevidencefrom60casecontrolstudies
AT panfuze associationbetweenmpo463gapolymorphismandcancerriskevidencefrom60casecontrolstudies
AT shichen associationbetweenmpo463gapolymorphismandcancerriskevidencefrom60casecontrolstudies
AT cenhong associationbetweenmpo463gapolymorphismandcancerriskevidencefrom60casecontrolstudies