Cargando…
Towards Mobile Gait Analysis: Concurrent Validity and Test-Retest Reliability of an Inertial Measurement System for the Assessment of Spatio-Temporal Gait Parameters
The purpose of this study was to assess the concurrent validity and test–retest reliability of a sensor-based gait analysis system. Eleven healthy subjects and four Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients were asked to complete gait tasks whilst wearing two inertial measurement units at their feet. The ex...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5539856/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28657587 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s17071522 |
_version_ | 1783254557432741888 |
---|---|
author | Kluge, Felix Gaßner, Heiko Hannink, Julius Pasluosta, Cristian Klucken, Jochen Eskofier, Björn M. |
author_facet | Kluge, Felix Gaßner, Heiko Hannink, Julius Pasluosta, Cristian Klucken, Jochen Eskofier, Björn M. |
author_sort | Kluge, Felix |
collection | PubMed |
description | The purpose of this study was to assess the concurrent validity and test–retest reliability of a sensor-based gait analysis system. Eleven healthy subjects and four Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients were asked to complete gait tasks whilst wearing two inertial measurement units at their feet. The extracted spatio-temporal parameters of 1166 strides were compared to those extracted from a reference camera-based motion capture system concerning concurrent validity. Test–retest reliability was assessed for five healthy subjects at three different days in a two week period. The two systems were highly correlated for all gait parameters ([Formula: see text]). The bias for stride time was [Formula: see text] ms and for stride length was [Formula: see text] cm. No systematic range dependent errors were observed and no significant changes existed between healthy subjects and PD patients. Test-retest reliability was excellent for all parameters (intraclass correlation (ICC) > 0.81) except for gait velocity (ICC > 0.55). The sensor-based system was able to accurately capture spatio-temporal gait parameters as compared to the reference camera-based system for normal and impaired gait. The system’s high retest reliability renders the use in recurrent clinical measurements and in long-term applications feasible. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5539856 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55398562017-08-11 Towards Mobile Gait Analysis: Concurrent Validity and Test-Retest Reliability of an Inertial Measurement System for the Assessment of Spatio-Temporal Gait Parameters Kluge, Felix Gaßner, Heiko Hannink, Julius Pasluosta, Cristian Klucken, Jochen Eskofier, Björn M. Sensors (Basel) Article The purpose of this study was to assess the concurrent validity and test–retest reliability of a sensor-based gait analysis system. Eleven healthy subjects and four Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients were asked to complete gait tasks whilst wearing two inertial measurement units at their feet. The extracted spatio-temporal parameters of 1166 strides were compared to those extracted from a reference camera-based motion capture system concerning concurrent validity. Test–retest reliability was assessed for five healthy subjects at three different days in a two week period. The two systems were highly correlated for all gait parameters ([Formula: see text]). The bias for stride time was [Formula: see text] ms and for stride length was [Formula: see text] cm. No systematic range dependent errors were observed and no significant changes existed between healthy subjects and PD patients. Test-retest reliability was excellent for all parameters (intraclass correlation (ICC) > 0.81) except for gait velocity (ICC > 0.55). The sensor-based system was able to accurately capture spatio-temporal gait parameters as compared to the reference camera-based system for normal and impaired gait. The system’s high retest reliability renders the use in recurrent clinical measurements and in long-term applications feasible. MDPI 2017-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5539856/ /pubmed/28657587 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s17071522 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Kluge, Felix Gaßner, Heiko Hannink, Julius Pasluosta, Cristian Klucken, Jochen Eskofier, Björn M. Towards Mobile Gait Analysis: Concurrent Validity and Test-Retest Reliability of an Inertial Measurement System for the Assessment of Spatio-Temporal Gait Parameters |
title | Towards Mobile Gait Analysis: Concurrent Validity and Test-Retest Reliability of an Inertial Measurement System for the Assessment of Spatio-Temporal Gait Parameters |
title_full | Towards Mobile Gait Analysis: Concurrent Validity and Test-Retest Reliability of an Inertial Measurement System for the Assessment of Spatio-Temporal Gait Parameters |
title_fullStr | Towards Mobile Gait Analysis: Concurrent Validity and Test-Retest Reliability of an Inertial Measurement System for the Assessment of Spatio-Temporal Gait Parameters |
title_full_unstemmed | Towards Mobile Gait Analysis: Concurrent Validity and Test-Retest Reliability of an Inertial Measurement System for the Assessment of Spatio-Temporal Gait Parameters |
title_short | Towards Mobile Gait Analysis: Concurrent Validity and Test-Retest Reliability of an Inertial Measurement System for the Assessment of Spatio-Temporal Gait Parameters |
title_sort | towards mobile gait analysis: concurrent validity and test-retest reliability of an inertial measurement system for the assessment of spatio-temporal gait parameters |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5539856/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28657587 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s17071522 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT klugefelix towardsmobilegaitanalysisconcurrentvalidityandtestretestreliabilityofaninertialmeasurementsystemfortheassessmentofspatiotemporalgaitparameters AT gaßnerheiko towardsmobilegaitanalysisconcurrentvalidityandtestretestreliabilityofaninertialmeasurementsystemfortheassessmentofspatiotemporalgaitparameters AT hanninkjulius towardsmobilegaitanalysisconcurrentvalidityandtestretestreliabilityofaninertialmeasurementsystemfortheassessmentofspatiotemporalgaitparameters AT pasluostacristian towardsmobilegaitanalysisconcurrentvalidityandtestretestreliabilityofaninertialmeasurementsystemfortheassessmentofspatiotemporalgaitparameters AT kluckenjochen towardsmobilegaitanalysisconcurrentvalidityandtestretestreliabilityofaninertialmeasurementsystemfortheassessmentofspatiotemporalgaitparameters AT eskofierbjornm towardsmobilegaitanalysisconcurrentvalidityandtestretestreliabilityofaninertialmeasurementsystemfortheassessmentofspatiotemporalgaitparameters |