Cargando…

Towards Mobile Gait Analysis: Concurrent Validity and Test-Retest Reliability of an Inertial Measurement System for the Assessment of Spatio-Temporal Gait Parameters

The purpose of this study was to assess the concurrent validity and test–retest reliability of a sensor-based gait analysis system. Eleven healthy subjects and four Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients were asked to complete gait tasks whilst wearing two inertial measurement units at their feet. The ex...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kluge, Felix, Gaßner, Heiko, Hannink, Julius, Pasluosta, Cristian, Klucken, Jochen, Eskofier, Björn M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5539856/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28657587
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s17071522
_version_ 1783254557432741888
author Kluge, Felix
Gaßner, Heiko
Hannink, Julius
Pasluosta, Cristian
Klucken, Jochen
Eskofier, Björn M.
author_facet Kluge, Felix
Gaßner, Heiko
Hannink, Julius
Pasluosta, Cristian
Klucken, Jochen
Eskofier, Björn M.
author_sort Kluge, Felix
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study was to assess the concurrent validity and test–retest reliability of a sensor-based gait analysis system. Eleven healthy subjects and four Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients were asked to complete gait tasks whilst wearing two inertial measurement units at their feet. The extracted spatio-temporal parameters of 1166 strides were compared to those extracted from a reference camera-based motion capture system concerning concurrent validity. Test–retest reliability was assessed for five healthy subjects at three different days in a two week period. The two systems were highly correlated for all gait parameters ([Formula: see text]). The bias for stride time was [Formula: see text] ms and for stride length was [Formula: see text] cm. No systematic range dependent errors were observed and no significant changes existed between healthy subjects and PD patients. Test-retest reliability was excellent for all parameters (intraclass correlation (ICC) > 0.81) except for gait velocity (ICC > 0.55). The sensor-based system was able to accurately capture spatio-temporal gait parameters as compared to the reference camera-based system for normal and impaired gait. The system’s high retest reliability renders the use in recurrent clinical measurements and in long-term applications feasible.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5539856
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55398562017-08-11 Towards Mobile Gait Analysis: Concurrent Validity and Test-Retest Reliability of an Inertial Measurement System for the Assessment of Spatio-Temporal Gait Parameters Kluge, Felix Gaßner, Heiko Hannink, Julius Pasluosta, Cristian Klucken, Jochen Eskofier, Björn M. Sensors (Basel) Article The purpose of this study was to assess the concurrent validity and test–retest reliability of a sensor-based gait analysis system. Eleven healthy subjects and four Parkinson’s disease (PD) patients were asked to complete gait tasks whilst wearing two inertial measurement units at their feet. The extracted spatio-temporal parameters of 1166 strides were compared to those extracted from a reference camera-based motion capture system concerning concurrent validity. Test–retest reliability was assessed for five healthy subjects at three different days in a two week period. The two systems were highly correlated for all gait parameters ([Formula: see text]). The bias for stride time was [Formula: see text] ms and for stride length was [Formula: see text] cm. No systematic range dependent errors were observed and no significant changes existed between healthy subjects and PD patients. Test-retest reliability was excellent for all parameters (intraclass correlation (ICC) > 0.81) except for gait velocity (ICC > 0.55). The sensor-based system was able to accurately capture spatio-temporal gait parameters as compared to the reference camera-based system for normal and impaired gait. The system’s high retest reliability renders the use in recurrent clinical measurements and in long-term applications feasible. MDPI 2017-06-28 /pmc/articles/PMC5539856/ /pubmed/28657587 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s17071522 Text en © 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kluge, Felix
Gaßner, Heiko
Hannink, Julius
Pasluosta, Cristian
Klucken, Jochen
Eskofier, Björn M.
Towards Mobile Gait Analysis: Concurrent Validity and Test-Retest Reliability of an Inertial Measurement System for the Assessment of Spatio-Temporal Gait Parameters
title Towards Mobile Gait Analysis: Concurrent Validity and Test-Retest Reliability of an Inertial Measurement System for the Assessment of Spatio-Temporal Gait Parameters
title_full Towards Mobile Gait Analysis: Concurrent Validity and Test-Retest Reliability of an Inertial Measurement System for the Assessment of Spatio-Temporal Gait Parameters
title_fullStr Towards Mobile Gait Analysis: Concurrent Validity and Test-Retest Reliability of an Inertial Measurement System for the Assessment of Spatio-Temporal Gait Parameters
title_full_unstemmed Towards Mobile Gait Analysis: Concurrent Validity and Test-Retest Reliability of an Inertial Measurement System for the Assessment of Spatio-Temporal Gait Parameters
title_short Towards Mobile Gait Analysis: Concurrent Validity and Test-Retest Reliability of an Inertial Measurement System for the Assessment of Spatio-Temporal Gait Parameters
title_sort towards mobile gait analysis: concurrent validity and test-retest reliability of an inertial measurement system for the assessment of spatio-temporal gait parameters
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5539856/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28657587
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s17071522
work_keys_str_mv AT klugefelix towardsmobilegaitanalysisconcurrentvalidityandtestretestreliabilityofaninertialmeasurementsystemfortheassessmentofspatiotemporalgaitparameters
AT gaßnerheiko towardsmobilegaitanalysisconcurrentvalidityandtestretestreliabilityofaninertialmeasurementsystemfortheassessmentofspatiotemporalgaitparameters
AT hanninkjulius towardsmobilegaitanalysisconcurrentvalidityandtestretestreliabilityofaninertialmeasurementsystemfortheassessmentofspatiotemporalgaitparameters
AT pasluostacristian towardsmobilegaitanalysisconcurrentvalidityandtestretestreliabilityofaninertialmeasurementsystemfortheassessmentofspatiotemporalgaitparameters
AT kluckenjochen towardsmobilegaitanalysisconcurrentvalidityandtestretestreliabilityofaninertialmeasurementsystemfortheassessmentofspatiotemporalgaitparameters
AT eskofierbjornm towardsmobilegaitanalysisconcurrentvalidityandtestretestreliabilityofaninertialmeasurementsystemfortheassessmentofspatiotemporalgaitparameters