Cargando…
Does one size really fit all? The effectiveness of a non-diagnosis-specific integrated mental health care program in Germany in a prospective, parallel-group controlled multi-centre trial
BACKGROUND: The Network for Mental Health (NWpG-IC) is an integrated mental health care program implemented in 2009 by cooperation between health insurance companies and community mental health providers in Germany. Meanwhile about 10,000 patients have been enrolled. This is the first study evaluati...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5539984/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28764729 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-017-1441-9 |
_version_ | 1783254573035552768 |
---|---|
author | Mueller-Stierlin, Annabel Sandra Helmbrecht, Marina Julia Herder, Katrin Prinz, Stefanie Rosenfeld, Nadine Walendzik, Julia Holzmann, Marco Dinc, Uemmueguelsuem Schützwohl, Matthias Becker, Thomas Kilian, Reinhold |
author_facet | Mueller-Stierlin, Annabel Sandra Helmbrecht, Marina Julia Herder, Katrin Prinz, Stefanie Rosenfeld, Nadine Walendzik, Julia Holzmann, Marco Dinc, Uemmueguelsuem Schützwohl, Matthias Becker, Thomas Kilian, Reinhold |
author_sort | Mueller-Stierlin, Annabel Sandra |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The Network for Mental Health (NWpG-IC) is an integrated mental health care program implemented in 2009 by cooperation between health insurance companies and community mental health providers in Germany. Meanwhile about 10,000 patients have been enrolled. This is the first study evaluating the effectiveness of the program in comparison to standard mental health care in Germany. METHODS: In a parallel-group controlled trial over 18 months conducted in five regions across Germany, a total of 260 patients enrolled in NWpG-IC and 251 patients in standard mental health care (TAU) were recruited between August 2013 and November 2014. The NWpG-IC patients had access to special services such as community-based multi-professional teams, case management, crisis intervention and family-oriented psychoeducation in addition to standard mental health care. The primary outcome empowerment (EPAS) and the secondary outcomes quality of life (WHO-QoL-BREF), satisfaction with psychiatric treatment (CSQ-8), psychosocial and clinical impairment (HoNOS) and information about mental health service needs (CAN) were measured four times at 6-month intervals. Linear mixed-effect regression models were used to estimate the main effects and interaction effects of treatment, time and primary diagnosis. Due to the non-randomised group assignment, propensity score adjustment was used to control the selection bias. RESULTS: NWpG-IC and TAU groups did not differ with respect to most primary and secondary outcomes in our participating patients who showed a broad spectrum of psychiatric diagnoses and illness severities. However, a significant improvement in terms of patients’ satisfaction with psychiatric care and their perception of treatment participation in favour of the NWpG-IC group was found. CONCLUSIONS: Providing integrated mental health care for unspecific mentally ill target groups increases treatment participation and service satisfaction but seems not suitable to enhance the overall outcomes of mental health care in Germany. The implementation of strategies for ameliorating the needs orientation of the NWpG-IC should be considered. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trial Register DRKS00005111, registered 26 July 2013. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12888-017-1441-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5539984 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55399842017-08-03 Does one size really fit all? The effectiveness of a non-diagnosis-specific integrated mental health care program in Germany in a prospective, parallel-group controlled multi-centre trial Mueller-Stierlin, Annabel Sandra Helmbrecht, Marina Julia Herder, Katrin Prinz, Stefanie Rosenfeld, Nadine Walendzik, Julia Holzmann, Marco Dinc, Uemmueguelsuem Schützwohl, Matthias Becker, Thomas Kilian, Reinhold BMC Psychiatry Research Article BACKGROUND: The Network for Mental Health (NWpG-IC) is an integrated mental health care program implemented in 2009 by cooperation between health insurance companies and community mental health providers in Germany. Meanwhile about 10,000 patients have been enrolled. This is the first study evaluating the effectiveness of the program in comparison to standard mental health care in Germany. METHODS: In a parallel-group controlled trial over 18 months conducted in five regions across Germany, a total of 260 patients enrolled in NWpG-IC and 251 patients in standard mental health care (TAU) were recruited between August 2013 and November 2014. The NWpG-IC patients had access to special services such as community-based multi-professional teams, case management, crisis intervention and family-oriented psychoeducation in addition to standard mental health care. The primary outcome empowerment (EPAS) and the secondary outcomes quality of life (WHO-QoL-BREF), satisfaction with psychiatric treatment (CSQ-8), psychosocial and clinical impairment (HoNOS) and information about mental health service needs (CAN) were measured four times at 6-month intervals. Linear mixed-effect regression models were used to estimate the main effects and interaction effects of treatment, time and primary diagnosis. Due to the non-randomised group assignment, propensity score adjustment was used to control the selection bias. RESULTS: NWpG-IC and TAU groups did not differ with respect to most primary and secondary outcomes in our participating patients who showed a broad spectrum of psychiatric diagnoses and illness severities. However, a significant improvement in terms of patients’ satisfaction with psychiatric care and their perception of treatment participation in favour of the NWpG-IC group was found. CONCLUSIONS: Providing integrated mental health care for unspecific mentally ill target groups increases treatment participation and service satisfaction but seems not suitable to enhance the overall outcomes of mental health care in Germany. The implementation of strategies for ameliorating the needs orientation of the NWpG-IC should be considered. TRIAL REGISTRATION: German Clinical Trial Register DRKS00005111, registered 26 July 2013. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12888-017-1441-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5539984/ /pubmed/28764729 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-017-1441-9 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Mueller-Stierlin, Annabel Sandra Helmbrecht, Marina Julia Herder, Katrin Prinz, Stefanie Rosenfeld, Nadine Walendzik, Julia Holzmann, Marco Dinc, Uemmueguelsuem Schützwohl, Matthias Becker, Thomas Kilian, Reinhold Does one size really fit all? The effectiveness of a non-diagnosis-specific integrated mental health care program in Germany in a prospective, parallel-group controlled multi-centre trial |
title | Does one size really fit all? The effectiveness of a non-diagnosis-specific integrated mental health care program in Germany in a prospective, parallel-group controlled multi-centre trial |
title_full | Does one size really fit all? The effectiveness of a non-diagnosis-specific integrated mental health care program in Germany in a prospective, parallel-group controlled multi-centre trial |
title_fullStr | Does one size really fit all? The effectiveness of a non-diagnosis-specific integrated mental health care program in Germany in a prospective, parallel-group controlled multi-centre trial |
title_full_unstemmed | Does one size really fit all? The effectiveness of a non-diagnosis-specific integrated mental health care program in Germany in a prospective, parallel-group controlled multi-centre trial |
title_short | Does one size really fit all? The effectiveness of a non-diagnosis-specific integrated mental health care program in Germany in a prospective, parallel-group controlled multi-centre trial |
title_sort | does one size really fit all? the effectiveness of a non-diagnosis-specific integrated mental health care program in germany in a prospective, parallel-group controlled multi-centre trial |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5539984/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28764729 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12888-017-1441-9 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT muellerstierlinannabelsandra doesonesizereallyfitalltheeffectivenessofanondiagnosisspecificintegratedmentalhealthcareprogramingermanyinaprospectiveparallelgroupcontrolledmulticentretrial AT helmbrechtmarinajulia doesonesizereallyfitalltheeffectivenessofanondiagnosisspecificintegratedmentalhealthcareprogramingermanyinaprospectiveparallelgroupcontrolledmulticentretrial AT herderkatrin doesonesizereallyfitalltheeffectivenessofanondiagnosisspecificintegratedmentalhealthcareprogramingermanyinaprospectiveparallelgroupcontrolledmulticentretrial AT prinzstefanie doesonesizereallyfitalltheeffectivenessofanondiagnosisspecificintegratedmentalhealthcareprogramingermanyinaprospectiveparallelgroupcontrolledmulticentretrial AT rosenfeldnadine doesonesizereallyfitalltheeffectivenessofanondiagnosisspecificintegratedmentalhealthcareprogramingermanyinaprospectiveparallelgroupcontrolledmulticentretrial AT walendzikjulia doesonesizereallyfitalltheeffectivenessofanondiagnosisspecificintegratedmentalhealthcareprogramingermanyinaprospectiveparallelgroupcontrolledmulticentretrial AT holzmannmarco doesonesizereallyfitalltheeffectivenessofanondiagnosisspecificintegratedmentalhealthcareprogramingermanyinaprospectiveparallelgroupcontrolledmulticentretrial AT dincuemmueguelsuem doesonesizereallyfitalltheeffectivenessofanondiagnosisspecificintegratedmentalhealthcareprogramingermanyinaprospectiveparallelgroupcontrolledmulticentretrial AT schutzwohlmatthias doesonesizereallyfitalltheeffectivenessofanondiagnosisspecificintegratedmentalhealthcareprogramingermanyinaprospectiveparallelgroupcontrolledmulticentretrial AT beckerthomas doesonesizereallyfitalltheeffectivenessofanondiagnosisspecificintegratedmentalhealthcareprogramingermanyinaprospectiveparallelgroupcontrolledmulticentretrial AT kilianreinhold doesonesizereallyfitalltheeffectivenessofanondiagnosisspecificintegratedmentalhealthcareprogramingermanyinaprospectiveparallelgroupcontrolledmulticentretrial |