Cargando…

Pathways for scaling up public health interventions

BACKGROUND: To achieve population-wide health improvement, public health interventions found effective in selected samples need to be ‘scaled up’ and implemented more widely. The pathways through which interventions are scaled up are not well characterised. The aim of this paper is to identify examp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Indig, Devon, Lee, Karen, Grunseit, Anne, Milat, Andrew, Bauman, Adrian
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5540381/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28764785
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4572-5
_version_ 1783254621249077248
author Indig, Devon
Lee, Karen
Grunseit, Anne
Milat, Andrew
Bauman, Adrian
author_facet Indig, Devon
Lee, Karen
Grunseit, Anne
Milat, Andrew
Bauman, Adrian
author_sort Indig, Devon
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To achieve population-wide health improvement, public health interventions found effective in selected samples need to be ‘scaled up’ and implemented more widely. The pathways through which interventions are scaled up are not well characterised. The aim of this paper is to identify examples of public health interventions which have been scaled up and to develop a conceptual framework which quantifies and describes this process. METHODS: A multi-stage international literature search was undertaken to identify examples of public health interventions in high income countries that have been scaled up or implemented at scale. Initial abstract review identified articles which met all the criteria of being a: 1) public health intervention; 2) chronic disease prevention focus; 3) program delivered at a wide geographical scale (state, national or international). Interventions were reviewed and coded into a conceptual framework pathway to document their scaling up process. For each program, an in-depth review of the identified articles was undertaken along with a broad internet based search to determine the outcomes of the dissemination process. A conceptual framework of scaling up pathways was developed that involved four stages (development, efficacy testing, real world trial and dissemination) to which the 40 programs were mapped. RESULTS: The search identified 40 public health interventions that showed evidence of being scaled up. Four pathways were identified to capture the different scaling up trajectories taken which included: ‘Type I – Comprehensive’ (55%) which passed through all four stages, ‘Type II – Efficacy omitters’ (5%) which did not conduct efficacy testing, ‘Type III – Trial omitters’ (25%) which did not conduct a real world trial, and ‘Type IV – At scale dissemination’ (15%) which skipped both efficacy testing and a real world trial. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to classify and quantify the potential pathways through which public health interventions in high income countries are scaled up to reach the broader population. Mapping these pathways not only demonstrates the different trajectories that occur in scaling up public health interventions, but also allows the variation across scaling up pathways to be classified. The policy and practice determinants leading to each pathway remain for future study, especially to identify the conditions under which efficacy and replication stages are missing.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5540381
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55403812017-08-03 Pathways for scaling up public health interventions Indig, Devon Lee, Karen Grunseit, Anne Milat, Andrew Bauman, Adrian BMC Public Health Research Article BACKGROUND: To achieve population-wide health improvement, public health interventions found effective in selected samples need to be ‘scaled up’ and implemented more widely. The pathways through which interventions are scaled up are not well characterised. The aim of this paper is to identify examples of public health interventions which have been scaled up and to develop a conceptual framework which quantifies and describes this process. METHODS: A multi-stage international literature search was undertaken to identify examples of public health interventions in high income countries that have been scaled up or implemented at scale. Initial abstract review identified articles which met all the criteria of being a: 1) public health intervention; 2) chronic disease prevention focus; 3) program delivered at a wide geographical scale (state, national or international). Interventions were reviewed and coded into a conceptual framework pathway to document their scaling up process. For each program, an in-depth review of the identified articles was undertaken along with a broad internet based search to determine the outcomes of the dissemination process. A conceptual framework of scaling up pathways was developed that involved four stages (development, efficacy testing, real world trial and dissemination) to which the 40 programs were mapped. RESULTS: The search identified 40 public health interventions that showed evidence of being scaled up. Four pathways were identified to capture the different scaling up trajectories taken which included: ‘Type I – Comprehensive’ (55%) which passed through all four stages, ‘Type II – Efficacy omitters’ (5%) which did not conduct efficacy testing, ‘Type III – Trial omitters’ (25%) which did not conduct a real world trial, and ‘Type IV – At scale dissemination’ (15%) which skipped both efficacy testing and a real world trial. CONCLUSIONS: This is the first study to classify and quantify the potential pathways through which public health interventions in high income countries are scaled up to reach the broader population. Mapping these pathways not only demonstrates the different trajectories that occur in scaling up public health interventions, but also allows the variation across scaling up pathways to be classified. The policy and practice determinants leading to each pathway remain for future study, especially to identify the conditions under which efficacy and replication stages are missing. BioMed Central 2017-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5540381/ /pubmed/28764785 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4572-5 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Indig, Devon
Lee, Karen
Grunseit, Anne
Milat, Andrew
Bauman, Adrian
Pathways for scaling up public health interventions
title Pathways for scaling up public health interventions
title_full Pathways for scaling up public health interventions
title_fullStr Pathways for scaling up public health interventions
title_full_unstemmed Pathways for scaling up public health interventions
title_short Pathways for scaling up public health interventions
title_sort pathways for scaling up public health interventions
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5540381/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28764785
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12889-017-4572-5
work_keys_str_mv AT indigdevon pathwaysforscalinguppublichealthinterventions
AT leekaren pathwaysforscalinguppublichealthinterventions
AT grunseitanne pathwaysforscalinguppublichealthinterventions
AT milatandrew pathwaysforscalinguppublichealthinterventions
AT baumanadrian pathwaysforscalinguppublichealthinterventions