Cargando…
Comparative analysis of the EGFR, HER2, c-MYC, and MET variations in colorectal cancer determined by three different measures: gene copy number gain, amplification status and the 2013 ASCO/CAP guideline criterion for HER2 testing of breast cancer
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to explore gene copy number (GCN) variation of EGFR, HER2, c-MYC, and MET in patients with primary colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS: Dual-colour silver-enhanced in situ hybridization was performed in tissue samples of 334 primary CRC patients. The amplificat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5540452/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28764718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-017-1265-x |
_version_ | 1783254634359422976 |
---|---|
author | Kwak, Yoonjin Yun, Sumi Nam, Soo Kyung Seo, An Na Lee, Kyu Sang Shin, Eun Oh, Heung-Kwon Kim, Duck Woo Kang, Sung Bum Kim, Woo Ho Lee, Hye Seung |
author_facet | Kwak, Yoonjin Yun, Sumi Nam, Soo Kyung Seo, An Na Lee, Kyu Sang Shin, Eun Oh, Heung-Kwon Kim, Duck Woo Kang, Sung Bum Kim, Woo Ho Lee, Hye Seung |
author_sort | Kwak, Yoonjin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to explore gene copy number (GCN) variation of EGFR, HER2, c-MYC, and MET in patients with primary colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS: Dual-colour silver-enhanced in situ hybridization was performed in tissue samples of 334 primary CRC patients. The amplification status (GCN ratio ≥2) and GCN gain (average GCN ≥4) data for the EGFR, HER2, c-MYC and MET genes were obtained. GCN variation was also assessed by the criterion of the 2013 ASCO/CAP guidelines for HER2 testing. RESULTS: Amplification of EGFR, HER2, c-MYC and MET was detected in 8 (2.4%), 20 (6.0%), 29 (8.7%), and 14 (4.2%) patients, respectively. Of 66 patients with at least one amplified gene, five exhibited co-amplification of genes studied (HER2-MET co-amplification: two patients; HER2-c-MYC co-amplification: two patients; EGFR-c-MYC co-amplification: one patient). There were 109 patients with GCN gains of one or more genes (EGFR: 11/334, HER2: 29/334, c-MYC; 60/334, MET: 48/334) and 32.1% (35/109) had multiple GCN gains. When each GCN was assessed by the criterion of the ASCO/CAP 2013 guideline for HER2 testing, 116 people showed positive or equivocal results for one or more genes. The cumulative amplification status had no association with patients’ outcome. However, the cumulative results of the GCN gain and GCN status determined according to the ASCO/CAP guideline had a significant prognostic correlation in the univariate analysis (P values of 0.006 and 0.022, respectively). In the multivariate analysis, GCN gain and GCN status were independent prognostic factors (P values of 0.010 and 0.017, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we evaluated GCN variation of four genes in a large sample of Korean CRC patients. The amplification status was not related to patient outcome. However, the GCN gain and GCN status according to the ASCO/CAP 2013 guideline were independent prognostic factors. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5540452 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55404522017-08-03 Comparative analysis of the EGFR, HER2, c-MYC, and MET variations in colorectal cancer determined by three different measures: gene copy number gain, amplification status and the 2013 ASCO/CAP guideline criterion for HER2 testing of breast cancer Kwak, Yoonjin Yun, Sumi Nam, Soo Kyung Seo, An Na Lee, Kyu Sang Shin, Eun Oh, Heung-Kwon Kim, Duck Woo Kang, Sung Bum Kim, Woo Ho Lee, Hye Seung J Transl Med Research BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to explore gene copy number (GCN) variation of EGFR, HER2, c-MYC, and MET in patients with primary colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS: Dual-colour silver-enhanced in situ hybridization was performed in tissue samples of 334 primary CRC patients. The amplification status (GCN ratio ≥2) and GCN gain (average GCN ≥4) data for the EGFR, HER2, c-MYC and MET genes were obtained. GCN variation was also assessed by the criterion of the 2013 ASCO/CAP guidelines for HER2 testing. RESULTS: Amplification of EGFR, HER2, c-MYC and MET was detected in 8 (2.4%), 20 (6.0%), 29 (8.7%), and 14 (4.2%) patients, respectively. Of 66 patients with at least one amplified gene, five exhibited co-amplification of genes studied (HER2-MET co-amplification: two patients; HER2-c-MYC co-amplification: two patients; EGFR-c-MYC co-amplification: one patient). There were 109 patients with GCN gains of one or more genes (EGFR: 11/334, HER2: 29/334, c-MYC; 60/334, MET: 48/334) and 32.1% (35/109) had multiple GCN gains. When each GCN was assessed by the criterion of the ASCO/CAP 2013 guideline for HER2 testing, 116 people showed positive or equivocal results for one or more genes. The cumulative amplification status had no association with patients’ outcome. However, the cumulative results of the GCN gain and GCN status determined according to the ASCO/CAP guideline had a significant prognostic correlation in the univariate analysis (P values of 0.006 and 0.022, respectively). In the multivariate analysis, GCN gain and GCN status were independent prognostic factors (P values of 0.010 and 0.017, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we evaluated GCN variation of four genes in a large sample of Korean CRC patients. The amplification status was not related to patient outcome. However, the GCN gain and GCN status according to the ASCO/CAP 2013 guideline were independent prognostic factors. BioMed Central 2017-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5540452/ /pubmed/28764718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-017-1265-x Text en © The Author(s) 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Kwak, Yoonjin Yun, Sumi Nam, Soo Kyung Seo, An Na Lee, Kyu Sang Shin, Eun Oh, Heung-Kwon Kim, Duck Woo Kang, Sung Bum Kim, Woo Ho Lee, Hye Seung Comparative analysis of the EGFR, HER2, c-MYC, and MET variations in colorectal cancer determined by three different measures: gene copy number gain, amplification status and the 2013 ASCO/CAP guideline criterion for HER2 testing of breast cancer |
title | Comparative analysis of the EGFR, HER2, c-MYC, and MET variations in colorectal cancer determined by three different measures: gene copy number gain, amplification status and the 2013 ASCO/CAP guideline criterion for HER2 testing of breast cancer |
title_full | Comparative analysis of the EGFR, HER2, c-MYC, and MET variations in colorectal cancer determined by three different measures: gene copy number gain, amplification status and the 2013 ASCO/CAP guideline criterion for HER2 testing of breast cancer |
title_fullStr | Comparative analysis of the EGFR, HER2, c-MYC, and MET variations in colorectal cancer determined by three different measures: gene copy number gain, amplification status and the 2013 ASCO/CAP guideline criterion for HER2 testing of breast cancer |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative analysis of the EGFR, HER2, c-MYC, and MET variations in colorectal cancer determined by three different measures: gene copy number gain, amplification status and the 2013 ASCO/CAP guideline criterion for HER2 testing of breast cancer |
title_short | Comparative analysis of the EGFR, HER2, c-MYC, and MET variations in colorectal cancer determined by three different measures: gene copy number gain, amplification status and the 2013 ASCO/CAP guideline criterion for HER2 testing of breast cancer |
title_sort | comparative analysis of the egfr, her2, c-myc, and met variations in colorectal cancer determined by three different measures: gene copy number gain, amplification status and the 2013 asco/cap guideline criterion for her2 testing of breast cancer |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5540452/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28764718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12967-017-1265-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kwakyoonjin comparativeanalysisoftheegfrher2cmycandmetvariationsincolorectalcancerdeterminedbythreedifferentmeasuresgenecopynumbergainamplificationstatusandthe2013ascocapguidelinecriterionforher2testingofbreastcancer AT yunsumi comparativeanalysisoftheegfrher2cmycandmetvariationsincolorectalcancerdeterminedbythreedifferentmeasuresgenecopynumbergainamplificationstatusandthe2013ascocapguidelinecriterionforher2testingofbreastcancer AT namsookyung comparativeanalysisoftheegfrher2cmycandmetvariationsincolorectalcancerdeterminedbythreedifferentmeasuresgenecopynumbergainamplificationstatusandthe2013ascocapguidelinecriterionforher2testingofbreastcancer AT seoanna comparativeanalysisoftheegfrher2cmycandmetvariationsincolorectalcancerdeterminedbythreedifferentmeasuresgenecopynumbergainamplificationstatusandthe2013ascocapguidelinecriterionforher2testingofbreastcancer AT leekyusang comparativeanalysisoftheegfrher2cmycandmetvariationsincolorectalcancerdeterminedbythreedifferentmeasuresgenecopynumbergainamplificationstatusandthe2013ascocapguidelinecriterionforher2testingofbreastcancer AT shineun comparativeanalysisoftheegfrher2cmycandmetvariationsincolorectalcancerdeterminedbythreedifferentmeasuresgenecopynumbergainamplificationstatusandthe2013ascocapguidelinecriterionforher2testingofbreastcancer AT ohheungkwon comparativeanalysisoftheegfrher2cmycandmetvariationsincolorectalcancerdeterminedbythreedifferentmeasuresgenecopynumbergainamplificationstatusandthe2013ascocapguidelinecriterionforher2testingofbreastcancer AT kimduckwoo comparativeanalysisoftheegfrher2cmycandmetvariationsincolorectalcancerdeterminedbythreedifferentmeasuresgenecopynumbergainamplificationstatusandthe2013ascocapguidelinecriterionforher2testingofbreastcancer AT kangsungbum comparativeanalysisoftheegfrher2cmycandmetvariationsincolorectalcancerdeterminedbythreedifferentmeasuresgenecopynumbergainamplificationstatusandthe2013ascocapguidelinecriterionforher2testingofbreastcancer AT kimwooho comparativeanalysisoftheegfrher2cmycandmetvariationsincolorectalcancerdeterminedbythreedifferentmeasuresgenecopynumbergainamplificationstatusandthe2013ascocapguidelinecriterionforher2testingofbreastcancer AT leehyeseung comparativeanalysisoftheegfrher2cmycandmetvariationsincolorectalcancerdeterminedbythreedifferentmeasuresgenecopynumbergainamplificationstatusandthe2013ascocapguidelinecriterionforher2testingofbreastcancer |