Cargando…

Evaluation of automated systems for aminoglycosides and fluoroquinolones susceptibility testing for Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae

BACKGROUND: Automated systems (MicroScan WalkAway 96 Plus, Phoenix 100, and Vitek 2 Compact) are widely used in clinical laboratories nowadays. The aim of this study is to evaluate the performance of these three systems for susceptibility testing of aminoglycosides and fluoroquinolones against Carba...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhao, Zhichang, Lan, Fangjun, Liu, Maobai, Chen, Weiyuan, Huang, Liya, Lin, Qili, Li, Bin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5540471/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28785404
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-017-0235-7
_version_ 1783254638577844224
author Zhao, Zhichang
Lan, Fangjun
Liu, Maobai
Chen, Weiyuan
Huang, Liya
Lin, Qili
Li, Bin
author_facet Zhao, Zhichang
Lan, Fangjun
Liu, Maobai
Chen, Weiyuan
Huang, Liya
Lin, Qili
Li, Bin
author_sort Zhao, Zhichang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Automated systems (MicroScan WalkAway 96 Plus, Phoenix 100, and Vitek 2 Compact) are widely used in clinical laboratories nowadays. The aim of this study is to evaluate the performance of these three systems for susceptibility testing of aminoglycosides and fluoroquinolones against Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE). METHODS: A total of 75 CRE isolates were used in this study. Quinolone resistance determinants (QRDs) (qnrA, qnrB, qnrC, qnrD, qnrS, aac(6′)-Ib-cr, oqxAB and qepA) and aminoglycoside resistance determinants (ARDs) (aac(6′)-Ib, armA, npmA, rmtA, rmtB, rmtC, rmtD and rmtE) of these CRE were screened by PCR. The MICs of aminoglycosides (gentamicin and amikacin) and fluoroquinolones (ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin) to CRE obtained with the automated systems were compared with the reference method (agar dilution method). RESULTS: Totally, 97.3% (73/75) of CRE harbored QRDs. The qnr gene was the most common QRD determinant identified in 68 (96.7%), followed by aac (6′)-Ib-cr in 56 (74.7%), oqxAB in 23 (30.7%), and qepA in 2 (2.7%), respectively. 22.7% (17/75) of CRE harbored ARD determinants. rmtA, rmtB and npmA were identified among these isolates in 6 (8.0%), 6 (8.0%) and 5 (6.7%), respectively. A total of 900 results were obtained in this study. Overall, the total error rate was 9.89%. Twenty-eight very major errors (3.11%), 22 major errors (2.44%) and 39 minor errors (4.33%) were identified against agar dilution method. The very major errors were almost evenly distributed between results for fluoroquinolones (2.89%) and aminoglycosides (3.33%), while the major errors and minor errors were more commonly found in the results of fluoroquinolones (3.11% and 6.44%, respectively) than aminoglycosides (1.78% and 2.22%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that testing difficulties in susceptibility testing do exist in automated systems. We suggest clinical laboratories using automated systems should consider using a second, independent antimicrobial susceptibility testing method to validate aminoglycosides and fluoroquinolones susceptibility.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5540471
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55404712017-08-07 Evaluation of automated systems for aminoglycosides and fluoroquinolones susceptibility testing for Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae Zhao, Zhichang Lan, Fangjun Liu, Maobai Chen, Weiyuan Huang, Liya Lin, Qili Li, Bin Antimicrob Resist Infect Control Research BACKGROUND: Automated systems (MicroScan WalkAway 96 Plus, Phoenix 100, and Vitek 2 Compact) are widely used in clinical laboratories nowadays. The aim of this study is to evaluate the performance of these three systems for susceptibility testing of aminoglycosides and fluoroquinolones against Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE). METHODS: A total of 75 CRE isolates were used in this study. Quinolone resistance determinants (QRDs) (qnrA, qnrB, qnrC, qnrD, qnrS, aac(6′)-Ib-cr, oqxAB and qepA) and aminoglycoside resistance determinants (ARDs) (aac(6′)-Ib, armA, npmA, rmtA, rmtB, rmtC, rmtD and rmtE) of these CRE were screened by PCR. The MICs of aminoglycosides (gentamicin and amikacin) and fluoroquinolones (ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin) to CRE obtained with the automated systems were compared with the reference method (agar dilution method). RESULTS: Totally, 97.3% (73/75) of CRE harbored QRDs. The qnr gene was the most common QRD determinant identified in 68 (96.7%), followed by aac (6′)-Ib-cr in 56 (74.7%), oqxAB in 23 (30.7%), and qepA in 2 (2.7%), respectively. 22.7% (17/75) of CRE harbored ARD determinants. rmtA, rmtB and npmA were identified among these isolates in 6 (8.0%), 6 (8.0%) and 5 (6.7%), respectively. A total of 900 results were obtained in this study. Overall, the total error rate was 9.89%. Twenty-eight very major errors (3.11%), 22 major errors (2.44%) and 39 minor errors (4.33%) were identified against agar dilution method. The very major errors were almost evenly distributed between results for fluoroquinolones (2.89%) and aminoglycosides (3.33%), while the major errors and minor errors were more commonly found in the results of fluoroquinolones (3.11% and 6.44%, respectively) than aminoglycosides (1.78% and 2.22%, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Our study shows that testing difficulties in susceptibility testing do exist in automated systems. We suggest clinical laboratories using automated systems should consider using a second, independent antimicrobial susceptibility testing method to validate aminoglycosides and fluoroquinolones susceptibility. BioMed Central 2017-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC5540471/ /pubmed/28785404 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-017-0235-7 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Zhao, Zhichang
Lan, Fangjun
Liu, Maobai
Chen, Weiyuan
Huang, Liya
Lin, Qili
Li, Bin
Evaluation of automated systems for aminoglycosides and fluoroquinolones susceptibility testing for Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae
title Evaluation of automated systems for aminoglycosides and fluoroquinolones susceptibility testing for Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae
title_full Evaluation of automated systems for aminoglycosides and fluoroquinolones susceptibility testing for Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae
title_fullStr Evaluation of automated systems for aminoglycosides and fluoroquinolones susceptibility testing for Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of automated systems for aminoglycosides and fluoroquinolones susceptibility testing for Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae
title_short Evaluation of automated systems for aminoglycosides and fluoroquinolones susceptibility testing for Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae
title_sort evaluation of automated systems for aminoglycosides and fluoroquinolones susceptibility testing for carbapenem-resistant enterobacteriaceae
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5540471/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28785404
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13756-017-0235-7
work_keys_str_mv AT zhaozhichang evaluationofautomatedsystemsforaminoglycosidesandfluoroquinolonessusceptibilitytestingforcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriaceae
AT lanfangjun evaluationofautomatedsystemsforaminoglycosidesandfluoroquinolonessusceptibilitytestingforcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriaceae
AT liumaobai evaluationofautomatedsystemsforaminoglycosidesandfluoroquinolonessusceptibilitytestingforcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriaceae
AT chenweiyuan evaluationofautomatedsystemsforaminoglycosidesandfluoroquinolonessusceptibilitytestingforcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriaceae
AT huangliya evaluationofautomatedsystemsforaminoglycosidesandfluoroquinolonessusceptibilitytestingforcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriaceae
AT linqili evaluationofautomatedsystemsforaminoglycosidesandfluoroquinolonessusceptibilitytestingforcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriaceae
AT libin evaluationofautomatedsystemsforaminoglycosidesandfluoroquinolonessusceptibilitytestingforcarbapenemresistantenterobacteriaceae