Cargando…

Systematic immunohistochemical screening for mismatch repair and ERCC1 gene expression from colorectal cancers in China: Clinicopathological characteristics and effects on survival

BACKGROUND: We performed a systematic screening of colorectal cancer (CRC) tissues to investigate whether mismatch repair (MMR) status and ERCC1 protein expression could be predictive of clinical outcomes for these patients following the recommendation of The Evaluation of Genomic Applications in Pr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Pan, Xiao, Zhitao, Braciak, Todd A., Ou, Qingjian, Chen, Gong, Oduncu, Fuat S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5540538/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28767665
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181615
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: We performed a systematic screening of colorectal cancer (CRC) tissues to investigate whether mismatch repair (MMR) status and ERCC1 protein expression could be predictive of clinical outcomes for these patients following the recommendation of The Evaluation of Genomic Applications in Practice of Prevention (EGAPP). METHODS: The expression of four MMR genes and ERCC1 were assessed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) from cancer tissue samples of 2233 consecutive CRC patients. RESULTS: We observed that most CRC patients with a proficient MMR (pMMR) status tended to have simultaneous ERCC1 protein expression (P< 0.001). Stage III CRC patients with deficient MMR (dMMR) had higher prognoses than the same stage patients with pMMR (DFS: 74% vs 65%, P = 0.04; OS: 79% vs 69%, P = 0.04). Here, dMMR is also associated with poorer survival for stage II patients after chemotherapy (DFS: 66% vs 78%, P = 0.04). Stage II and III patients that were shown to express ERCC1 protein had higher DFS and OS than those that were deficient in expression (stage II, DFS: 83% vs 70%, P = 0.006; OS 85% vs 73%, P = 0.02. Stage III, DFS: 67% vs56%, P = 0.03; OS: 71% vs 57%, P = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that dMMR appeared to predictive of a survival benefit for stage III CRC patients. We also found the determination of ERCC1 expression to be useful for predicting DFS or OS for stage II and III CRC patients. In addition, the expression of MMR genes and ERCC1 showed a significant relationship.