Cargando…
Comparing TMS perturbations to occipital and parietal cortices in concurrent TMS-fMRI studies—Methodological considerations
Neglect and hemianopia are two neuropsychological syndromes that are associated with reduced awareness for visual signals in patients’ contralesional hemifield. They offer the unique possibility to dissociate the contributions of retino-geniculate and retino-colliculo circuitries in visual perceptio...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5540584/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28767670 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181438 |
_version_ | 1783254663453212672 |
---|---|
author | Leitão, Joana Thielscher, Axel Tuennerhoff, Johannes Noppeney, Uta |
author_facet | Leitão, Joana Thielscher, Axel Tuennerhoff, Johannes Noppeney, Uta |
author_sort | Leitão, Joana |
collection | PubMed |
description | Neglect and hemianopia are two neuropsychological syndromes that are associated with reduced awareness for visual signals in patients’ contralesional hemifield. They offer the unique possibility to dissociate the contributions of retino-geniculate and retino-colliculo circuitries in visual perception. Yet, insights from patient fMRI studies are limited by heterogeneity in lesion location and extent, long-term functional reorganization and behavioural compensation after stroke. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has therefore been proposed as a complementary method to investigate the effect of transient perturbations on functional brain organization. This concurrent TMS-fMRI study applied TMS perturbation to occipital and parietal cortices with the aim to ‘mimick’ neglect and hemianopia. Based on the challenges and interpretational limitations of our own study we aim to provide tutorial guidance on how future studies should compare TMS to primary sensory and association areas that are governed by distinct computational principles, neural dynamics and functional architecture. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5540584 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55405842017-08-12 Comparing TMS perturbations to occipital and parietal cortices in concurrent TMS-fMRI studies—Methodological considerations Leitão, Joana Thielscher, Axel Tuennerhoff, Johannes Noppeney, Uta PLoS One Research Article Neglect and hemianopia are two neuropsychological syndromes that are associated with reduced awareness for visual signals in patients’ contralesional hemifield. They offer the unique possibility to dissociate the contributions of retino-geniculate and retino-colliculo circuitries in visual perception. Yet, insights from patient fMRI studies are limited by heterogeneity in lesion location and extent, long-term functional reorganization and behavioural compensation after stroke. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has therefore been proposed as a complementary method to investigate the effect of transient perturbations on functional brain organization. This concurrent TMS-fMRI study applied TMS perturbation to occipital and parietal cortices with the aim to ‘mimick’ neglect and hemianopia. Based on the challenges and interpretational limitations of our own study we aim to provide tutorial guidance on how future studies should compare TMS to primary sensory and association areas that are governed by distinct computational principles, neural dynamics and functional architecture. Public Library of Science 2017-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5540584/ /pubmed/28767670 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181438 Text en © 2017 Leitão et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Leitão, Joana Thielscher, Axel Tuennerhoff, Johannes Noppeney, Uta Comparing TMS perturbations to occipital and parietal cortices in concurrent TMS-fMRI studies—Methodological considerations |
title | Comparing TMS perturbations to occipital and parietal cortices in concurrent TMS-fMRI studies—Methodological considerations |
title_full | Comparing TMS perturbations to occipital and parietal cortices in concurrent TMS-fMRI studies—Methodological considerations |
title_fullStr | Comparing TMS perturbations to occipital and parietal cortices in concurrent TMS-fMRI studies—Methodological considerations |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparing TMS perturbations to occipital and parietal cortices in concurrent TMS-fMRI studies—Methodological considerations |
title_short | Comparing TMS perturbations to occipital and parietal cortices in concurrent TMS-fMRI studies—Methodological considerations |
title_sort | comparing tms perturbations to occipital and parietal cortices in concurrent tms-fmri studies—methodological considerations |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5540584/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28767670 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181438 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leitaojoana comparingtmsperturbationstooccipitalandparietalcorticesinconcurrenttmsfmristudiesmethodologicalconsiderations AT thielscheraxel comparingtmsperturbationstooccipitalandparietalcorticesinconcurrenttmsfmristudiesmethodologicalconsiderations AT tuennerhoffjohannes comparingtmsperturbationstooccipitalandparietalcorticesinconcurrenttmsfmristudiesmethodologicalconsiderations AT noppeneyuta comparingtmsperturbationstooccipitalandparietalcorticesinconcurrenttmsfmristudiesmethodologicalconsiderations |