Cargando…

Comparing TMS perturbations to occipital and parietal cortices in concurrent TMS-fMRI studies—Methodological considerations

Neglect and hemianopia are two neuropsychological syndromes that are associated with reduced awareness for visual signals in patients’ contralesional hemifield. They offer the unique possibility to dissociate the contributions of retino-geniculate and retino-colliculo circuitries in visual perceptio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leitão, Joana, Thielscher, Axel, Tuennerhoff, Johannes, Noppeney, Uta
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5540584/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28767670
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181438
_version_ 1783254663453212672
author Leitão, Joana
Thielscher, Axel
Tuennerhoff, Johannes
Noppeney, Uta
author_facet Leitão, Joana
Thielscher, Axel
Tuennerhoff, Johannes
Noppeney, Uta
author_sort Leitão, Joana
collection PubMed
description Neglect and hemianopia are two neuropsychological syndromes that are associated with reduced awareness for visual signals in patients’ contralesional hemifield. They offer the unique possibility to dissociate the contributions of retino-geniculate and retino-colliculo circuitries in visual perception. Yet, insights from patient fMRI studies are limited by heterogeneity in lesion location and extent, long-term functional reorganization and behavioural compensation after stroke. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has therefore been proposed as a complementary method to investigate the effect of transient perturbations on functional brain organization. This concurrent TMS-fMRI study applied TMS perturbation to occipital and parietal cortices with the aim to ‘mimick’ neglect and hemianopia. Based on the challenges and interpretational limitations of our own study we aim to provide tutorial guidance on how future studies should compare TMS to primary sensory and association areas that are governed by distinct computational principles, neural dynamics and functional architecture.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5540584
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55405842017-08-12 Comparing TMS perturbations to occipital and parietal cortices in concurrent TMS-fMRI studies—Methodological considerations Leitão, Joana Thielscher, Axel Tuennerhoff, Johannes Noppeney, Uta PLoS One Research Article Neglect and hemianopia are two neuropsychological syndromes that are associated with reduced awareness for visual signals in patients’ contralesional hemifield. They offer the unique possibility to dissociate the contributions of retino-geniculate and retino-colliculo circuitries in visual perception. Yet, insights from patient fMRI studies are limited by heterogeneity in lesion location and extent, long-term functional reorganization and behavioural compensation after stroke. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has therefore been proposed as a complementary method to investigate the effect of transient perturbations on functional brain organization. This concurrent TMS-fMRI study applied TMS perturbation to occipital and parietal cortices with the aim to ‘mimick’ neglect and hemianopia. Based on the challenges and interpretational limitations of our own study we aim to provide tutorial guidance on how future studies should compare TMS to primary sensory and association areas that are governed by distinct computational principles, neural dynamics and functional architecture. Public Library of Science 2017-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5540584/ /pubmed/28767670 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181438 Text en © 2017 Leitão et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Leitão, Joana
Thielscher, Axel
Tuennerhoff, Johannes
Noppeney, Uta
Comparing TMS perturbations to occipital and parietal cortices in concurrent TMS-fMRI studies—Methodological considerations
title Comparing TMS perturbations to occipital and parietal cortices in concurrent TMS-fMRI studies—Methodological considerations
title_full Comparing TMS perturbations to occipital and parietal cortices in concurrent TMS-fMRI studies—Methodological considerations
title_fullStr Comparing TMS perturbations to occipital and parietal cortices in concurrent TMS-fMRI studies—Methodological considerations
title_full_unstemmed Comparing TMS perturbations to occipital and parietal cortices in concurrent TMS-fMRI studies—Methodological considerations
title_short Comparing TMS perturbations to occipital and parietal cortices in concurrent TMS-fMRI studies—Methodological considerations
title_sort comparing tms perturbations to occipital and parietal cortices in concurrent tms-fmri studies—methodological considerations
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5540584/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28767670
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181438
work_keys_str_mv AT leitaojoana comparingtmsperturbationstooccipitalandparietalcorticesinconcurrenttmsfmristudiesmethodologicalconsiderations
AT thielscheraxel comparingtmsperturbationstooccipitalandparietalcorticesinconcurrenttmsfmristudiesmethodologicalconsiderations
AT tuennerhoffjohannes comparingtmsperturbationstooccipitalandparietalcorticesinconcurrenttmsfmristudiesmethodologicalconsiderations
AT noppeneyuta comparingtmsperturbationstooccipitalandparietalcorticesinconcurrenttmsfmristudiesmethodologicalconsiderations