Cargando…
Oral vitamin B(12 )therapy in the primary care setting: a qualitative and quantitative study of patient perspectives
BACKGROUND: Although oral replacement with high doses of vitamin B(12 )is both effective and safe for the treatment of B(12 )deficiency, little is known about patients' views concerning the acceptability and effectiveness of oral B(12). We investigated patient perspectives on switching from inj...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2005
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC554115/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15723708 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-6-8 |
_version_ | 1782122509635682304 |
---|---|
author | Kwong, Jeff C Carr, David Dhalla, Irfan A Tom-Kun, Denise Upshur, Ross EG |
author_facet | Kwong, Jeff C Carr, David Dhalla, Irfan A Tom-Kun, Denise Upshur, Ross EG |
author_sort | Kwong, Jeff C |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Although oral replacement with high doses of vitamin B(12 )is both effective and safe for the treatment of B(12 )deficiency, little is known about patients' views concerning the acceptability and effectiveness of oral B(12). We investigated patient perspectives on switching from injection to oral B(12 )therapy. METHODS: This study involved a quantitative arm using questionnaires and a qualitative arm using semi-structured interviews, both to assess patient views on injection and oral therapy. Patients were also offered a six-month trial of oral B(12 )therapy. One hundred and thirty-three patients who receive regular B(12 )injections were included from three family practice units (two hospital-based academic clinics and one community health centre clinic) in Toronto. RESULTS: Seventy-three percent (63/86) of respondents were willing to try oral B(12). In a multivariate analysis, patient factors associated with a "willingness to switch" to oral B(12 )included being able to get to the clinic in less than 30 minutes (OR 9.3, 95% CI 2.2–40.0), and believing that frequent visits to the health care provider (OR 5.4, 95% CI 1.1–26.6) or the increased costs to the health care system (OR 16.7, 95% CI 1.5–184.2) were disadvantages of injection B(12). Fifty-five patients attempted oral therapy and 52 patients returned the final questionnaire. Of those who tried oral therapy, 76% (39/51) were satisfied and 71% (39/55) wished to permanently switch. Factors associated with permanently switching to oral therapy included believing that the frequent visits to the health care provider (OR 35.4, 95% CI 2.9–432.7) and travel/parking costs (OR 8.7, 95% CI 1.2–65.3) were disadvantages of injection B(12). Interview participants consistently cited convenience as an advantage of oral therapy. CONCLUSION: Switching patients from injection to oral B(12 )is both feasible and acceptable to patients. Oral B(12 )supplementation is well received largely due to increased convenience. Clinicians should offer oral B(12 )therapy to their patients who are currently receiving injections, and newly diagnosed B(12)-deficient patients who can tolerate and are compliant with oral medications should be offered oral supplementation. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-554115 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2005 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-5541152005-03-13 Oral vitamin B(12 )therapy in the primary care setting: a qualitative and quantitative study of patient perspectives Kwong, Jeff C Carr, David Dhalla, Irfan A Tom-Kun, Denise Upshur, Ross EG BMC Fam Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: Although oral replacement with high doses of vitamin B(12 )is both effective and safe for the treatment of B(12 )deficiency, little is known about patients' views concerning the acceptability and effectiveness of oral B(12). We investigated patient perspectives on switching from injection to oral B(12 )therapy. METHODS: This study involved a quantitative arm using questionnaires and a qualitative arm using semi-structured interviews, both to assess patient views on injection and oral therapy. Patients were also offered a six-month trial of oral B(12 )therapy. One hundred and thirty-three patients who receive regular B(12 )injections were included from three family practice units (two hospital-based academic clinics and one community health centre clinic) in Toronto. RESULTS: Seventy-three percent (63/86) of respondents were willing to try oral B(12). In a multivariate analysis, patient factors associated with a "willingness to switch" to oral B(12 )included being able to get to the clinic in less than 30 minutes (OR 9.3, 95% CI 2.2–40.0), and believing that frequent visits to the health care provider (OR 5.4, 95% CI 1.1–26.6) or the increased costs to the health care system (OR 16.7, 95% CI 1.5–184.2) were disadvantages of injection B(12). Fifty-five patients attempted oral therapy and 52 patients returned the final questionnaire. Of those who tried oral therapy, 76% (39/51) were satisfied and 71% (39/55) wished to permanently switch. Factors associated with permanently switching to oral therapy included believing that the frequent visits to the health care provider (OR 35.4, 95% CI 2.9–432.7) and travel/parking costs (OR 8.7, 95% CI 1.2–65.3) were disadvantages of injection B(12). Interview participants consistently cited convenience as an advantage of oral therapy. CONCLUSION: Switching patients from injection to oral B(12 )is both feasible and acceptable to patients. Oral B(12 )supplementation is well received largely due to increased convenience. Clinicians should offer oral B(12 )therapy to their patients who are currently receiving injections, and newly diagnosed B(12)-deficient patients who can tolerate and are compliant with oral medications should be offered oral supplementation. BioMed Central 2005-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC554115/ /pubmed/15723708 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-6-8 Text en Copyright © 2005 Kwong et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0) ), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Kwong, Jeff C Carr, David Dhalla, Irfan A Tom-Kun, Denise Upshur, Ross EG Oral vitamin B(12 )therapy in the primary care setting: a qualitative and quantitative study of patient perspectives |
title | Oral vitamin B(12 )therapy in the primary care setting: a qualitative and quantitative study of patient perspectives |
title_full | Oral vitamin B(12 )therapy in the primary care setting: a qualitative and quantitative study of patient perspectives |
title_fullStr | Oral vitamin B(12 )therapy in the primary care setting: a qualitative and quantitative study of patient perspectives |
title_full_unstemmed | Oral vitamin B(12 )therapy in the primary care setting: a qualitative and quantitative study of patient perspectives |
title_short | Oral vitamin B(12 )therapy in the primary care setting: a qualitative and quantitative study of patient perspectives |
title_sort | oral vitamin b(12 )therapy in the primary care setting: a qualitative and quantitative study of patient perspectives |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC554115/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15723708 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2296-6-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kwongjeffc oralvitaminb12therapyintheprimarycaresettingaqualitativeandquantitativestudyofpatientperspectives AT carrdavid oralvitaminb12therapyintheprimarycaresettingaqualitativeandquantitativestudyofpatientperspectives AT dhallairfana oralvitaminb12therapyintheprimarycaresettingaqualitativeandquantitativestudyofpatientperspectives AT tomkundenise oralvitaminb12therapyintheprimarycaresettingaqualitativeandquantitativestudyofpatientperspectives AT upshurrosseg oralvitaminb12therapyintheprimarycaresettingaqualitativeandquantitativestudyofpatientperspectives |