Cargando…

Youth Oriented Activity Trackers: Comprehensive Laboratory- and Field-Based Validation

BACKGROUND: Commercial activity trackers are growing in popularity among adults and some are beginning to be marketed to children. There is, however, a paucity of independent research examining the validity of these devices to detect physical activity of different intensity levels. OBJECTIVES: The p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sirard, John R, Masteller, Brittany, Freedson, Patty S, Mendoza, Albert, Hickey, Amanda
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: JMIR Publications 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5541239/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28724509
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6360
_version_ 1783254775246094336
author Sirard, John R
Masteller, Brittany
Freedson, Patty S
Mendoza, Albert
Hickey, Amanda
author_facet Sirard, John R
Masteller, Brittany
Freedson, Patty S
Mendoza, Albert
Hickey, Amanda
author_sort Sirard, John R
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Commercial activity trackers are growing in popularity among adults and some are beginning to be marketed to children. There is, however, a paucity of independent research examining the validity of these devices to detect physical activity of different intensity levels. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine the validity of the output from 3 commercial youth-oriented activity trackers in 3 phases: (1) orbital shaker, (2) structured indoor activities, and (3) 4 days of free-living activity. METHODS: Four units of each activity tracker (Movband [MB], Sqord [SQ], and Zamzee [ZZ]) were tested in an orbital shaker for 5-minutes at three frequencies (1.3, 1.9, and 2.5 Hz). Participants for Phase 2 (N=14) and Phase 3 (N=16) were 6-12 year old children (50% male). For Phase 2, participants completed 9 structured activities while wearing each tracker, the ActiGraph GT3X+ (AG) research accelerometer, and a portable indirect calorimetry system to assess energy expenditure (EE). For Phase 3, participants wore all 4 devices for 4 consecutive days. Correlation coefficients, linear models, and non-parametric statistics evaluated the criterion and construct validity of the activity tracker output. RESULTS: Output from all devices was significantly associated with oscillation frequency (r=.92-.99). During Phase 2, MB and ZZ only differentiated sedentary from light intensity (P<.01), whereas the SQ significantly differentiated among all intensity categories (all comparisons P<.01), similar to AG and EE. During Phase 3, AG counts were significantly associated with activity tracker output (r=.76, .86, and .59 for the MB, SQ, and ZZ, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Across study phases, the SQ demonstrated stronger validity than the MB and ZZ. The validity of youth-oriented activity trackers may directly impact their effectiveness as behavior modification tools, demonstrating a need for more research on such devices.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5541239
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher JMIR Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55412392017-08-21 Youth Oriented Activity Trackers: Comprehensive Laboratory- and Field-Based Validation Sirard, John R Masteller, Brittany Freedson, Patty S Mendoza, Albert Hickey, Amanda J Med Internet Res Original Paper BACKGROUND: Commercial activity trackers are growing in popularity among adults and some are beginning to be marketed to children. There is, however, a paucity of independent research examining the validity of these devices to detect physical activity of different intensity levels. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to determine the validity of the output from 3 commercial youth-oriented activity trackers in 3 phases: (1) orbital shaker, (2) structured indoor activities, and (3) 4 days of free-living activity. METHODS: Four units of each activity tracker (Movband [MB], Sqord [SQ], and Zamzee [ZZ]) were tested in an orbital shaker for 5-minutes at three frequencies (1.3, 1.9, and 2.5 Hz). Participants for Phase 2 (N=14) and Phase 3 (N=16) were 6-12 year old children (50% male). For Phase 2, participants completed 9 structured activities while wearing each tracker, the ActiGraph GT3X+ (AG) research accelerometer, and a portable indirect calorimetry system to assess energy expenditure (EE). For Phase 3, participants wore all 4 devices for 4 consecutive days. Correlation coefficients, linear models, and non-parametric statistics evaluated the criterion and construct validity of the activity tracker output. RESULTS: Output from all devices was significantly associated with oscillation frequency (r=.92-.99). During Phase 2, MB and ZZ only differentiated sedentary from light intensity (P<.01), whereas the SQ significantly differentiated among all intensity categories (all comparisons P<.01), similar to AG and EE. During Phase 3, AG counts were significantly associated with activity tracker output (r=.76, .86, and .59 for the MB, SQ, and ZZ, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Across study phases, the SQ demonstrated stronger validity than the MB and ZZ. The validity of youth-oriented activity trackers may directly impact their effectiveness as behavior modification tools, demonstrating a need for more research on such devices. JMIR Publications 2017-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5541239/ /pubmed/28724509 http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6360 Text en ©John R Sirard, Brittany Masteller, Patty S Freedson, Albert Mendoza, Amanda Hickey. Originally published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research (http://www.jmir.org), 19.07.2017. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in the Journal of Medical Internet Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://www.jmir.org/, as well as this copyright and license information must be included.
spellingShingle Original Paper
Sirard, John R
Masteller, Brittany
Freedson, Patty S
Mendoza, Albert
Hickey, Amanda
Youth Oriented Activity Trackers: Comprehensive Laboratory- and Field-Based Validation
title Youth Oriented Activity Trackers: Comprehensive Laboratory- and Field-Based Validation
title_full Youth Oriented Activity Trackers: Comprehensive Laboratory- and Field-Based Validation
title_fullStr Youth Oriented Activity Trackers: Comprehensive Laboratory- and Field-Based Validation
title_full_unstemmed Youth Oriented Activity Trackers: Comprehensive Laboratory- and Field-Based Validation
title_short Youth Oriented Activity Trackers: Comprehensive Laboratory- and Field-Based Validation
title_sort youth oriented activity trackers: comprehensive laboratory- and field-based validation
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5541239/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28724509
http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.6360
work_keys_str_mv AT sirardjohnr youthorientedactivitytrackerscomprehensivelaboratoryandfieldbasedvalidation
AT mastellerbrittany youthorientedactivitytrackerscomprehensivelaboratoryandfieldbasedvalidation
AT freedsonpattys youthorientedactivitytrackerscomprehensivelaboratoryandfieldbasedvalidation
AT mendozaalbert youthorientedactivitytrackerscomprehensivelaboratoryandfieldbasedvalidation
AT hickeyamanda youthorientedactivitytrackerscomprehensivelaboratoryandfieldbasedvalidation