Cargando…
Protocol for an online randomised controlled trial to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a peer-supported self-management intervention for relatives of people with psychosis or bipolar disorder: Relatives Education And Coping Toolkit (REACT)
INTRODUCTION: Despite clinical guidelines recommendations, many relatives of people with psychosis or bipolar disorder do not currently receive the support they need. Online information and support may offer a solution. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This single-blind, parallel, online randomised controlled...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Open
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5541455/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28720617 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016965 |
_version_ | 1783254810002194432 |
---|---|
author | Lobban, Fiona Robinson, Heather Appelbe, Duncan Barraclough, Johanna Bedson, Emma Collinge, Lizzie Dodd, Susanna Flowers, Sue Honary, Mahsa Johnson, Sonia Mateus, Ceu Mezes, Barbara Minns, Valerie Murray, Elizabeth Walker, Andrew Williamson, Paula Wintermeyer, Catherine Jones, Steven |
author_facet | Lobban, Fiona Robinson, Heather Appelbe, Duncan Barraclough, Johanna Bedson, Emma Collinge, Lizzie Dodd, Susanna Flowers, Sue Honary, Mahsa Johnson, Sonia Mateus, Ceu Mezes, Barbara Minns, Valerie Murray, Elizabeth Walker, Andrew Williamson, Paula Wintermeyer, Catherine Jones, Steven |
author_sort | Lobban, Fiona |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Despite clinical guidelines recommendations, many relatives of people with psychosis or bipolar disorder do not currently receive the support they need. Online information and support may offer a solution. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This single-blind, parallel, online randomised controlled trial will determine clinical and cost-effectiveness of the Relatives Education And Coping Toolkit (REACT) (including an online resource directory (RD)), compared with RD only, for relatives of people with psychosis or bipolar disorder. Both groups continue to receive treatment as usual. Independent, web-based variable, block, individual randomisation will be used across 666 relatives. Primary outcome is distress at 24 weeks (measured by General Health Questionnaire; GHQ-28) compared between groups using analysis of covariance, adjusting for baseline score. Secondary clinical outcomes are carer well-being and support. Cost-effectiveness analysis will determine cost of a significant unit change (three-point reduction) in the GHQ-28. Costs include offering and supporting the intervention in the REACT arm, relevant healthcare care costs including health professional contacts, medications prescribed and time off (or ability to) work for the relative. Cost utility analysis will be calculated as the marginal cost of changes in quality-adjusted life years, based on EuroQol. We will explore relatives’ beliefs, perceived coping and amount of REACT toolkit use as possible outcome mediators. We have embedded two methodological substudies in the protocol to determine the relative effectiveness of a low-value (£10) versus higher value (£20) incentive, and an unconditional versus conditional incentive, on improving follow-up rates. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The trial has ethical approval from Lancaster National Research Ethics Service (NRES)Committee (15/NW/0732) and is overseen by an independent Data Monitoring and Ethics Committee and Trial Steering Committee. Protocol version 1.5 was approved on 9 January 2017. All updates to protocols are uploaded to the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Journals Library. A full statistical analysis plan is available at https://figshare.com/account/home#/projects/19975. Publications will be in peer-reviewed journals (open access wherever possible). Requests for access to the data at the end of the study will be reviewed and granted where appropriate by the Trial Management Group. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN72019945, pre-results. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5541455 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BMJ Open |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55414552017-08-18 Protocol for an online randomised controlled trial to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a peer-supported self-management intervention for relatives of people with psychosis or bipolar disorder: Relatives Education And Coping Toolkit (REACT) Lobban, Fiona Robinson, Heather Appelbe, Duncan Barraclough, Johanna Bedson, Emma Collinge, Lizzie Dodd, Susanna Flowers, Sue Honary, Mahsa Johnson, Sonia Mateus, Ceu Mezes, Barbara Minns, Valerie Murray, Elizabeth Walker, Andrew Williamson, Paula Wintermeyer, Catherine Jones, Steven BMJ Open Mental Health INTRODUCTION: Despite clinical guidelines recommendations, many relatives of people with psychosis or bipolar disorder do not currently receive the support they need. Online information and support may offer a solution. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This single-blind, parallel, online randomised controlled trial will determine clinical and cost-effectiveness of the Relatives Education And Coping Toolkit (REACT) (including an online resource directory (RD)), compared with RD only, for relatives of people with psychosis or bipolar disorder. Both groups continue to receive treatment as usual. Independent, web-based variable, block, individual randomisation will be used across 666 relatives. Primary outcome is distress at 24 weeks (measured by General Health Questionnaire; GHQ-28) compared between groups using analysis of covariance, adjusting for baseline score. Secondary clinical outcomes are carer well-being and support. Cost-effectiveness analysis will determine cost of a significant unit change (three-point reduction) in the GHQ-28. Costs include offering and supporting the intervention in the REACT arm, relevant healthcare care costs including health professional contacts, medications prescribed and time off (or ability to) work for the relative. Cost utility analysis will be calculated as the marginal cost of changes in quality-adjusted life years, based on EuroQol. We will explore relatives’ beliefs, perceived coping and amount of REACT toolkit use as possible outcome mediators. We have embedded two methodological substudies in the protocol to determine the relative effectiveness of a low-value (£10) versus higher value (£20) incentive, and an unconditional versus conditional incentive, on improving follow-up rates. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The trial has ethical approval from Lancaster National Research Ethics Service (NRES)Committee (15/NW/0732) and is overseen by an independent Data Monitoring and Ethics Committee and Trial Steering Committee. Protocol version 1.5 was approved on 9 January 2017. All updates to protocols are uploaded to the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Journals Library. A full statistical analysis plan is available at https://figshare.com/account/home#/projects/19975. Publications will be in peer-reviewed journals (open access wherever possible). Requests for access to the data at the end of the study will be reviewed and granted where appropriate by the Trial Management Group. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN72019945, pre-results. BMJ Open 2017-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5541455/ /pubmed/28720617 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016965 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Mental Health Lobban, Fiona Robinson, Heather Appelbe, Duncan Barraclough, Johanna Bedson, Emma Collinge, Lizzie Dodd, Susanna Flowers, Sue Honary, Mahsa Johnson, Sonia Mateus, Ceu Mezes, Barbara Minns, Valerie Murray, Elizabeth Walker, Andrew Williamson, Paula Wintermeyer, Catherine Jones, Steven Protocol for an online randomised controlled trial to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a peer-supported self-management intervention for relatives of people with psychosis or bipolar disorder: Relatives Education And Coping Toolkit (REACT) |
title | Protocol for an online randomised controlled trial to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a peer-supported self-management intervention for relatives of people with psychosis or bipolar disorder: Relatives Education And Coping Toolkit (REACT) |
title_full | Protocol for an online randomised controlled trial to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a peer-supported self-management intervention for relatives of people with psychosis or bipolar disorder: Relatives Education And Coping Toolkit (REACT) |
title_fullStr | Protocol for an online randomised controlled trial to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a peer-supported self-management intervention for relatives of people with psychosis or bipolar disorder: Relatives Education And Coping Toolkit (REACT) |
title_full_unstemmed | Protocol for an online randomised controlled trial to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a peer-supported self-management intervention for relatives of people with psychosis or bipolar disorder: Relatives Education And Coping Toolkit (REACT) |
title_short | Protocol for an online randomised controlled trial to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a peer-supported self-management intervention for relatives of people with psychosis or bipolar disorder: Relatives Education And Coping Toolkit (REACT) |
title_sort | protocol for an online randomised controlled trial to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a peer-supported self-management intervention for relatives of people with psychosis or bipolar disorder: relatives education and coping toolkit (react) |
topic | Mental Health |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5541455/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28720617 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016965 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT lobbanfiona protocolforanonlinerandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatetheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofapeersupportedselfmanagementinterventionforrelativesofpeoplewithpsychosisorbipolardisorderrelativeseducationandcopingtoolkitreact AT robinsonheather protocolforanonlinerandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatetheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofapeersupportedselfmanagementinterventionforrelativesofpeoplewithpsychosisorbipolardisorderrelativeseducationandcopingtoolkitreact AT appelbeduncan protocolforanonlinerandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatetheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofapeersupportedselfmanagementinterventionforrelativesofpeoplewithpsychosisorbipolardisorderrelativeseducationandcopingtoolkitreact AT barracloughjohanna protocolforanonlinerandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatetheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofapeersupportedselfmanagementinterventionforrelativesofpeoplewithpsychosisorbipolardisorderrelativeseducationandcopingtoolkitreact AT bedsonemma protocolforanonlinerandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatetheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofapeersupportedselfmanagementinterventionforrelativesofpeoplewithpsychosisorbipolardisorderrelativeseducationandcopingtoolkitreact AT collingelizzie protocolforanonlinerandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatetheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofapeersupportedselfmanagementinterventionforrelativesofpeoplewithpsychosisorbipolardisorderrelativeseducationandcopingtoolkitreact AT doddsusanna protocolforanonlinerandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatetheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofapeersupportedselfmanagementinterventionforrelativesofpeoplewithpsychosisorbipolardisorderrelativeseducationandcopingtoolkitreact AT flowerssue protocolforanonlinerandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatetheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofapeersupportedselfmanagementinterventionforrelativesofpeoplewithpsychosisorbipolardisorderrelativeseducationandcopingtoolkitreact AT honarymahsa protocolforanonlinerandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatetheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofapeersupportedselfmanagementinterventionforrelativesofpeoplewithpsychosisorbipolardisorderrelativeseducationandcopingtoolkitreact AT johnsonsonia protocolforanonlinerandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatetheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofapeersupportedselfmanagementinterventionforrelativesofpeoplewithpsychosisorbipolardisorderrelativeseducationandcopingtoolkitreact AT mateusceu protocolforanonlinerandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatetheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofapeersupportedselfmanagementinterventionforrelativesofpeoplewithpsychosisorbipolardisorderrelativeseducationandcopingtoolkitreact AT mezesbarbara protocolforanonlinerandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatetheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofapeersupportedselfmanagementinterventionforrelativesofpeoplewithpsychosisorbipolardisorderrelativeseducationandcopingtoolkitreact AT minnsvalerie protocolforanonlinerandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatetheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofapeersupportedselfmanagementinterventionforrelativesofpeoplewithpsychosisorbipolardisorderrelativeseducationandcopingtoolkitreact AT murrayelizabeth protocolforanonlinerandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatetheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofapeersupportedselfmanagementinterventionforrelativesofpeoplewithpsychosisorbipolardisorderrelativeseducationandcopingtoolkitreact AT walkerandrew protocolforanonlinerandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatetheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofapeersupportedselfmanagementinterventionforrelativesofpeoplewithpsychosisorbipolardisorderrelativeseducationandcopingtoolkitreact AT williamsonpaula protocolforanonlinerandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatetheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofapeersupportedselfmanagementinterventionforrelativesofpeoplewithpsychosisorbipolardisorderrelativeseducationandcopingtoolkitreact AT wintermeyercatherine protocolforanonlinerandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatetheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofapeersupportedselfmanagementinterventionforrelativesofpeoplewithpsychosisorbipolardisorderrelativeseducationandcopingtoolkitreact AT jonessteven protocolforanonlinerandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatetheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofapeersupportedselfmanagementinterventionforrelativesofpeoplewithpsychosisorbipolardisorderrelativeseducationandcopingtoolkitreact |