Cargando…

Protocol for an online randomised controlled trial to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a peer-supported self-management intervention for relatives of people with psychosis or bipolar disorder: Relatives Education And Coping Toolkit (REACT)

INTRODUCTION: Despite clinical guidelines recommendations, many relatives of people with psychosis or bipolar disorder do not currently receive the support they need. Online information and support may offer a solution. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This single-blind, parallel, online randomised controlled...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lobban, Fiona, Robinson, Heather, Appelbe, Duncan, Barraclough, Johanna, Bedson, Emma, Collinge, Lizzie, Dodd, Susanna, Flowers, Sue, Honary, Mahsa, Johnson, Sonia, Mateus, Ceu, Mezes, Barbara, Minns, Valerie, Murray, Elizabeth, Walker, Andrew, Williamson, Paula, Wintermeyer, Catherine, Jones, Steven
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Open 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5541455/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28720617
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016965
_version_ 1783254810002194432
author Lobban, Fiona
Robinson, Heather
Appelbe, Duncan
Barraclough, Johanna
Bedson, Emma
Collinge, Lizzie
Dodd, Susanna
Flowers, Sue
Honary, Mahsa
Johnson, Sonia
Mateus, Ceu
Mezes, Barbara
Minns, Valerie
Murray, Elizabeth
Walker, Andrew
Williamson, Paula
Wintermeyer, Catherine
Jones, Steven
author_facet Lobban, Fiona
Robinson, Heather
Appelbe, Duncan
Barraclough, Johanna
Bedson, Emma
Collinge, Lizzie
Dodd, Susanna
Flowers, Sue
Honary, Mahsa
Johnson, Sonia
Mateus, Ceu
Mezes, Barbara
Minns, Valerie
Murray, Elizabeth
Walker, Andrew
Williamson, Paula
Wintermeyer, Catherine
Jones, Steven
author_sort Lobban, Fiona
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Despite clinical guidelines recommendations, many relatives of people with psychosis or bipolar disorder do not currently receive the support they need. Online information and support may offer a solution. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This single-blind, parallel, online randomised controlled trial will determine clinical and cost-effectiveness of the Relatives Education And Coping Toolkit (REACT) (including an online resource directory (RD)), compared with RD only, for relatives of people with psychosis or bipolar disorder. Both groups continue to receive treatment as usual. Independent, web-based variable, block, individual randomisation will be used across 666 relatives. Primary outcome is distress at 24 weeks (measured by General Health Questionnaire; GHQ-28) compared between groups using analysis of covariance, adjusting for baseline score. Secondary clinical outcomes are carer well-being and support. Cost-effectiveness analysis will determine cost of a significant unit change (three-point reduction) in the GHQ-28. Costs include offering and supporting the intervention in the REACT arm, relevant healthcare care costs including health professional contacts, medications prescribed and time off (or ability to) work for the relative. Cost utility analysis will be calculated as the marginal cost of changes in quality-adjusted life years, based on EuroQol. We will explore relatives’ beliefs, perceived coping and amount of REACT toolkit use as possible outcome mediators. We have embedded two methodological substudies in the protocol to determine the relative effectiveness of a low-value (£10) versus higher value (£20) incentive, and an unconditional versus conditional incentive, on improving follow-up rates. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The trial has ethical approval from Lancaster National Research Ethics Service (NRES)Committee (15/NW/0732) and is overseen by an independent Data Monitoring and Ethics Committee and Trial Steering Committee. Protocol version 1.5 was approved on 9 January 2017. All updates to protocols are uploaded to the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Journals Library. A full statistical analysis plan is available at https://figshare.com/account/home#/projects/19975. Publications will be in peer-reviewed journals (open access wherever possible). Requests for access to the data at the end of the study will be reviewed and granted where appropriate by the Trial Management Group. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN72019945, pre-results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5541455
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Open
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55414552017-08-18 Protocol for an online randomised controlled trial to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a peer-supported self-management intervention for relatives of people with psychosis or bipolar disorder: Relatives Education And Coping Toolkit (REACT) Lobban, Fiona Robinson, Heather Appelbe, Duncan Barraclough, Johanna Bedson, Emma Collinge, Lizzie Dodd, Susanna Flowers, Sue Honary, Mahsa Johnson, Sonia Mateus, Ceu Mezes, Barbara Minns, Valerie Murray, Elizabeth Walker, Andrew Williamson, Paula Wintermeyer, Catherine Jones, Steven BMJ Open Mental Health INTRODUCTION: Despite clinical guidelines recommendations, many relatives of people with psychosis or bipolar disorder do not currently receive the support they need. Online information and support may offer a solution. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This single-blind, parallel, online randomised controlled trial will determine clinical and cost-effectiveness of the Relatives Education And Coping Toolkit (REACT) (including an online resource directory (RD)), compared with RD only, for relatives of people with psychosis or bipolar disorder. Both groups continue to receive treatment as usual. Independent, web-based variable, block, individual randomisation will be used across 666 relatives. Primary outcome is distress at 24 weeks (measured by General Health Questionnaire; GHQ-28) compared between groups using analysis of covariance, adjusting for baseline score. Secondary clinical outcomes are carer well-being and support. Cost-effectiveness analysis will determine cost of a significant unit change (three-point reduction) in the GHQ-28. Costs include offering and supporting the intervention in the REACT arm, relevant healthcare care costs including health professional contacts, medications prescribed and time off (or ability to) work for the relative. Cost utility analysis will be calculated as the marginal cost of changes in quality-adjusted life years, based on EuroQol. We will explore relatives’ beliefs, perceived coping and amount of REACT toolkit use as possible outcome mediators. We have embedded two methodological substudies in the protocol to determine the relative effectiveness of a low-value (£10) versus higher value (£20) incentive, and an unconditional versus conditional incentive, on improving follow-up rates. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The trial has ethical approval from Lancaster National Research Ethics Service (NRES)Committee (15/NW/0732) and is overseen by an independent Data Monitoring and Ethics Committee and Trial Steering Committee. Protocol version 1.5 was approved on 9 January 2017. All updates to protocols are uploaded to the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Journals Library. A full statistical analysis plan is available at https://figshare.com/account/home#/projects/19975. Publications will be in peer-reviewed journals (open access wherever possible). Requests for access to the data at the end of the study will be reviewed and granted where appropriate by the Trial Management Group. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN72019945, pre-results. BMJ Open 2017-07-18 /pmc/articles/PMC5541455/ /pubmed/28720617 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016965 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
spellingShingle Mental Health
Lobban, Fiona
Robinson, Heather
Appelbe, Duncan
Barraclough, Johanna
Bedson, Emma
Collinge, Lizzie
Dodd, Susanna
Flowers, Sue
Honary, Mahsa
Johnson, Sonia
Mateus, Ceu
Mezes, Barbara
Minns, Valerie
Murray, Elizabeth
Walker, Andrew
Williamson, Paula
Wintermeyer, Catherine
Jones, Steven
Protocol for an online randomised controlled trial to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a peer-supported self-management intervention for relatives of people with psychosis or bipolar disorder: Relatives Education And Coping Toolkit (REACT)
title Protocol for an online randomised controlled trial to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a peer-supported self-management intervention for relatives of people with psychosis or bipolar disorder: Relatives Education And Coping Toolkit (REACT)
title_full Protocol for an online randomised controlled trial to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a peer-supported self-management intervention for relatives of people with psychosis or bipolar disorder: Relatives Education And Coping Toolkit (REACT)
title_fullStr Protocol for an online randomised controlled trial to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a peer-supported self-management intervention for relatives of people with psychosis or bipolar disorder: Relatives Education And Coping Toolkit (REACT)
title_full_unstemmed Protocol for an online randomised controlled trial to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a peer-supported self-management intervention for relatives of people with psychosis or bipolar disorder: Relatives Education And Coping Toolkit (REACT)
title_short Protocol for an online randomised controlled trial to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a peer-supported self-management intervention for relatives of people with psychosis or bipolar disorder: Relatives Education And Coping Toolkit (REACT)
title_sort protocol for an online randomised controlled trial to evaluate the clinical and cost-effectiveness of a peer-supported self-management intervention for relatives of people with psychosis or bipolar disorder: relatives education and coping toolkit (react)
topic Mental Health
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5541455/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28720617
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016965
work_keys_str_mv AT lobbanfiona protocolforanonlinerandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatetheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofapeersupportedselfmanagementinterventionforrelativesofpeoplewithpsychosisorbipolardisorderrelativeseducationandcopingtoolkitreact
AT robinsonheather protocolforanonlinerandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatetheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofapeersupportedselfmanagementinterventionforrelativesofpeoplewithpsychosisorbipolardisorderrelativeseducationandcopingtoolkitreact
AT appelbeduncan protocolforanonlinerandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatetheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofapeersupportedselfmanagementinterventionforrelativesofpeoplewithpsychosisorbipolardisorderrelativeseducationandcopingtoolkitreact
AT barracloughjohanna protocolforanonlinerandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatetheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofapeersupportedselfmanagementinterventionforrelativesofpeoplewithpsychosisorbipolardisorderrelativeseducationandcopingtoolkitreact
AT bedsonemma protocolforanonlinerandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatetheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofapeersupportedselfmanagementinterventionforrelativesofpeoplewithpsychosisorbipolardisorderrelativeseducationandcopingtoolkitreact
AT collingelizzie protocolforanonlinerandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatetheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofapeersupportedselfmanagementinterventionforrelativesofpeoplewithpsychosisorbipolardisorderrelativeseducationandcopingtoolkitreact
AT doddsusanna protocolforanonlinerandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatetheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofapeersupportedselfmanagementinterventionforrelativesofpeoplewithpsychosisorbipolardisorderrelativeseducationandcopingtoolkitreact
AT flowerssue protocolforanonlinerandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatetheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofapeersupportedselfmanagementinterventionforrelativesofpeoplewithpsychosisorbipolardisorderrelativeseducationandcopingtoolkitreact
AT honarymahsa protocolforanonlinerandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatetheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofapeersupportedselfmanagementinterventionforrelativesofpeoplewithpsychosisorbipolardisorderrelativeseducationandcopingtoolkitreact
AT johnsonsonia protocolforanonlinerandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatetheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofapeersupportedselfmanagementinterventionforrelativesofpeoplewithpsychosisorbipolardisorderrelativeseducationandcopingtoolkitreact
AT mateusceu protocolforanonlinerandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatetheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofapeersupportedselfmanagementinterventionforrelativesofpeoplewithpsychosisorbipolardisorderrelativeseducationandcopingtoolkitreact
AT mezesbarbara protocolforanonlinerandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatetheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofapeersupportedselfmanagementinterventionforrelativesofpeoplewithpsychosisorbipolardisorderrelativeseducationandcopingtoolkitreact
AT minnsvalerie protocolforanonlinerandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatetheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofapeersupportedselfmanagementinterventionforrelativesofpeoplewithpsychosisorbipolardisorderrelativeseducationandcopingtoolkitreact
AT murrayelizabeth protocolforanonlinerandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatetheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofapeersupportedselfmanagementinterventionforrelativesofpeoplewithpsychosisorbipolardisorderrelativeseducationandcopingtoolkitreact
AT walkerandrew protocolforanonlinerandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatetheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofapeersupportedselfmanagementinterventionforrelativesofpeoplewithpsychosisorbipolardisorderrelativeseducationandcopingtoolkitreact
AT williamsonpaula protocolforanonlinerandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatetheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofapeersupportedselfmanagementinterventionforrelativesofpeoplewithpsychosisorbipolardisorderrelativeseducationandcopingtoolkitreact
AT wintermeyercatherine protocolforanonlinerandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatetheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofapeersupportedselfmanagementinterventionforrelativesofpeoplewithpsychosisorbipolardisorderrelativeseducationandcopingtoolkitreact
AT jonessteven protocolforanonlinerandomisedcontrolledtrialtoevaluatetheclinicalandcosteffectivenessofapeersupportedselfmanagementinterventionforrelativesofpeoplewithpsychosisorbipolardisorderrelativeseducationandcopingtoolkitreact