Cargando…

Detailed assessment of benefits and risks of retrievable inferior vena cava filters on patients with complicated injuries: the da Vinci multicentre randomised controlled trial study protocol

INTRODUCTION: Retrievable inferior vena cava (IVC) filters have been increasingly used in patients with major trauma who have contraindications to anticoagulant prophylaxis as a primary prophylactic measure against venous thromboembolism (VTE). The benefits, risks and cost-effectiveness of such stra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ho, Kwok M, Rao, Sudhakar, Honeybul, Stephen, Zellweger, Rene, Wibrow, Bradley, Lipman, Jeffrey, Holley, Anthony, Kop, Alan, Geelhoed, Elizabeth, Corcoran, Tomas
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5541499/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28706106
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016747
_version_ 1783254820147167232
author Ho, Kwok M
Rao, Sudhakar
Honeybul, Stephen
Zellweger, Rene
Wibrow, Bradley
Lipman, Jeffrey
Holley, Anthony
Kop, Alan
Geelhoed, Elizabeth
Corcoran, Tomas
author_facet Ho, Kwok M
Rao, Sudhakar
Honeybul, Stephen
Zellweger, Rene
Wibrow, Bradley
Lipman, Jeffrey
Holley, Anthony
Kop, Alan
Geelhoed, Elizabeth
Corcoran, Tomas
author_sort Ho, Kwok M
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Retrievable inferior vena cava (IVC) filters have been increasingly used in patients with major trauma who have contraindications to anticoagulant prophylaxis as a primary prophylactic measure against venous thromboembolism (VTE). The benefits, risks and cost-effectiveness of such strategy are uncertain. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Patients with major trauma, defined by an estimated Injury Severity Score >15, who have contraindications to anticoagulant VTE prophylaxis within 72 hours of hospitalisation to the study centre will be eligible for this randomised multicentre controlled trial. After obtaining consent from patients, or the persons responsible for the patients, study patients are randomly allocated to either control or IVC filter, within 72 hours of trauma admission, in a 1:1 ratio by permuted blocks stratified by study centre. The primary outcomes are (1) the composite endpoint of (A) pulmonary embolism (PE) as demonstrated by CT pulmonary angiography, high probability ventilation/perfusion scan, transoesophageal echocardiography (by showing clots within pulmonary arterial trunk), pulmonary angiography or postmortem examination during the same hospitalisation or 90-day after trauma whichever is earlier and (B) hospital mortality; and (2) the total cost of treatment including the costs of an IVC filter, total number of CT and ultrasound scans required, length of intensive care unit and hospital stay, procedures and drugs required to treat PE or complications related to the IVC filters. The study started in June 2015 and the final enrolment target is 240 patients. No interim analysis is planned; incidence of fatal PE is used as safety stopping rule for the trial. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was obtained in all four participating centres in Australia. Results of the main trial and each of the secondary endpoints will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12614000963628; Pre-results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5541499
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55414992017-08-18 Detailed assessment of benefits and risks of retrievable inferior vena cava filters on patients with complicated injuries: the da Vinci multicentre randomised controlled trial study protocol Ho, Kwok M Rao, Sudhakar Honeybul, Stephen Zellweger, Rene Wibrow, Bradley Lipman, Jeffrey Holley, Anthony Kop, Alan Geelhoed, Elizabeth Corcoran, Tomas BMJ Open Intensive Care INTRODUCTION: Retrievable inferior vena cava (IVC) filters have been increasingly used in patients with major trauma who have contraindications to anticoagulant prophylaxis as a primary prophylactic measure against venous thromboembolism (VTE). The benefits, risks and cost-effectiveness of such strategy are uncertain. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: Patients with major trauma, defined by an estimated Injury Severity Score >15, who have contraindications to anticoagulant VTE prophylaxis within 72 hours of hospitalisation to the study centre will be eligible for this randomised multicentre controlled trial. After obtaining consent from patients, or the persons responsible for the patients, study patients are randomly allocated to either control or IVC filter, within 72 hours of trauma admission, in a 1:1 ratio by permuted blocks stratified by study centre. The primary outcomes are (1) the composite endpoint of (A) pulmonary embolism (PE) as demonstrated by CT pulmonary angiography, high probability ventilation/perfusion scan, transoesophageal echocardiography (by showing clots within pulmonary arterial trunk), pulmonary angiography or postmortem examination during the same hospitalisation or 90-day after trauma whichever is earlier and (B) hospital mortality; and (2) the total cost of treatment including the costs of an IVC filter, total number of CT and ultrasound scans required, length of intensive care unit and hospital stay, procedures and drugs required to treat PE or complications related to the IVC filters. The study started in June 2015 and the final enrolment target is 240 patients. No interim analysis is planned; incidence of fatal PE is used as safety stopping rule for the trial. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval was obtained in all four participating centres in Australia. Results of the main trial and each of the secondary endpoints will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12614000963628; Pre-results. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC5541499/ /pubmed/28706106 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016747 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Intensive Care
Ho, Kwok M
Rao, Sudhakar
Honeybul, Stephen
Zellweger, Rene
Wibrow, Bradley
Lipman, Jeffrey
Holley, Anthony
Kop, Alan
Geelhoed, Elizabeth
Corcoran, Tomas
Detailed assessment of benefits and risks of retrievable inferior vena cava filters on patients with complicated injuries: the da Vinci multicentre randomised controlled trial study protocol
title Detailed assessment of benefits and risks of retrievable inferior vena cava filters on patients with complicated injuries: the da Vinci multicentre randomised controlled trial study protocol
title_full Detailed assessment of benefits and risks of retrievable inferior vena cava filters on patients with complicated injuries: the da Vinci multicentre randomised controlled trial study protocol
title_fullStr Detailed assessment of benefits and risks of retrievable inferior vena cava filters on patients with complicated injuries: the da Vinci multicentre randomised controlled trial study protocol
title_full_unstemmed Detailed assessment of benefits and risks of retrievable inferior vena cava filters on patients with complicated injuries: the da Vinci multicentre randomised controlled trial study protocol
title_short Detailed assessment of benefits and risks of retrievable inferior vena cava filters on patients with complicated injuries: the da Vinci multicentre randomised controlled trial study protocol
title_sort detailed assessment of benefits and risks of retrievable inferior vena cava filters on patients with complicated injuries: the da vinci multicentre randomised controlled trial study protocol
topic Intensive Care
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5541499/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28706106
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016747
work_keys_str_mv AT hokwokm detailedassessmentofbenefitsandrisksofretrievableinferiorvenacavafiltersonpatientswithcomplicatedinjuriesthedavincimulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialstudyprotocol
AT raosudhakar detailedassessmentofbenefitsandrisksofretrievableinferiorvenacavafiltersonpatientswithcomplicatedinjuriesthedavincimulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialstudyprotocol
AT honeybulstephen detailedassessmentofbenefitsandrisksofretrievableinferiorvenacavafiltersonpatientswithcomplicatedinjuriesthedavincimulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialstudyprotocol
AT zellwegerrene detailedassessmentofbenefitsandrisksofretrievableinferiorvenacavafiltersonpatientswithcomplicatedinjuriesthedavincimulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialstudyprotocol
AT wibrowbradley detailedassessmentofbenefitsandrisksofretrievableinferiorvenacavafiltersonpatientswithcomplicatedinjuriesthedavincimulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialstudyprotocol
AT lipmanjeffrey detailedassessmentofbenefitsandrisksofretrievableinferiorvenacavafiltersonpatientswithcomplicatedinjuriesthedavincimulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialstudyprotocol
AT holleyanthony detailedassessmentofbenefitsandrisksofretrievableinferiorvenacavafiltersonpatientswithcomplicatedinjuriesthedavincimulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialstudyprotocol
AT kopalan detailedassessmentofbenefitsandrisksofretrievableinferiorvenacavafiltersonpatientswithcomplicatedinjuriesthedavincimulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialstudyprotocol
AT geelhoedelizabeth detailedassessmentofbenefitsandrisksofretrievableinferiorvenacavafiltersonpatientswithcomplicatedinjuriesthedavincimulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialstudyprotocol
AT corcorantomas detailedassessmentofbenefitsandrisksofretrievableinferiorvenacavafiltersonpatientswithcomplicatedinjuriesthedavincimulticentrerandomisedcontrolledtrialstudyprotocol