Cargando…

Group choices seemingly at odds with individual preferences

Numerous studies have focused on the influence of the social environment and the interactions between individuals on the collective decision-making of groups. They showed, for example, that attraction between individuals is at the origin of an amplification of individual preferences. These preferenc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Laurent Salazar, Michel-Olivier, Nicolis, Stamatios C., Calvo Martín, Mariano, Sempo, Grégory, Deneubourg, Jean-Louis, Planas-Sitjà, Isaac
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society Publishing 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5541546/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28791151
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.170232
_version_ 1783254831318695936
author Laurent Salazar, Michel-Olivier
Nicolis, Stamatios C.
Calvo Martín, Mariano
Sempo, Grégory
Deneubourg, Jean-Louis
Planas-Sitjà, Isaac
author_facet Laurent Salazar, Michel-Olivier
Nicolis, Stamatios C.
Calvo Martín, Mariano
Sempo, Grégory
Deneubourg, Jean-Louis
Planas-Sitjà, Isaac
author_sort Laurent Salazar, Michel-Olivier
collection PubMed
description Numerous studies have focused on the influence of the social environment and the interactions between individuals on the collective decision-making of groups. They showed, for example, that attraction between individuals is at the origin of an amplification of individual preferences. These preferences may concern various environmental cues such as biomolecules that convey information about the environment such as vanillin, which, for some insects, is an attractant. In this study, we analysed how the social context of the cockroaches of the species Periplaneta americana modifies preferences when individuals are offered two shelters, of which one is vanillin scented. One of the principal results of our study is that isolated individuals stay longer and more frequently in a vanillin-scented shelter, while groups choose more frequently the unscented one. Moreover, the proportion of sheltered insects is larger when the group selects the unscented shelter. Our experimental results and theoretical model suggest that the individual preference is not inverted when insects are in a group but, rather, the response to vanillin decreases the attraction between individuals. As a result, aggregation is favoured in the unscented shelter, leading therefore to a collective inversion.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5541546
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher The Royal Society Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55415462017-08-08 Group choices seemingly at odds with individual preferences Laurent Salazar, Michel-Olivier Nicolis, Stamatios C. Calvo Martín, Mariano Sempo, Grégory Deneubourg, Jean-Louis Planas-Sitjà, Isaac R Soc Open Sci Biology (Whole Organism) Numerous studies have focused on the influence of the social environment and the interactions between individuals on the collective decision-making of groups. They showed, for example, that attraction between individuals is at the origin of an amplification of individual preferences. These preferences may concern various environmental cues such as biomolecules that convey information about the environment such as vanillin, which, for some insects, is an attractant. In this study, we analysed how the social context of the cockroaches of the species Periplaneta americana modifies preferences when individuals are offered two shelters, of which one is vanillin scented. One of the principal results of our study is that isolated individuals stay longer and more frequently in a vanillin-scented shelter, while groups choose more frequently the unscented one. Moreover, the proportion of sheltered insects is larger when the group selects the unscented shelter. Our experimental results and theoretical model suggest that the individual preference is not inverted when insects are in a group but, rather, the response to vanillin decreases the attraction between individuals. As a result, aggregation is favoured in the unscented shelter, leading therefore to a collective inversion. The Royal Society Publishing 2017-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC5541546/ /pubmed/28791151 http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.170232 Text en © 2017 The Authors. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Biology (Whole Organism)
Laurent Salazar, Michel-Olivier
Nicolis, Stamatios C.
Calvo Martín, Mariano
Sempo, Grégory
Deneubourg, Jean-Louis
Planas-Sitjà, Isaac
Group choices seemingly at odds with individual preferences
title Group choices seemingly at odds with individual preferences
title_full Group choices seemingly at odds with individual preferences
title_fullStr Group choices seemingly at odds with individual preferences
title_full_unstemmed Group choices seemingly at odds with individual preferences
title_short Group choices seemingly at odds with individual preferences
title_sort group choices seemingly at odds with individual preferences
topic Biology (Whole Organism)
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5541546/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28791151
http://dx.doi.org/10.1098/rsos.170232
work_keys_str_mv AT laurentsalazarmichelolivier groupchoicesseeminglyatoddswithindividualpreferences
AT nicolisstamatiosc groupchoicesseeminglyatoddswithindividualpreferences
AT calvomartinmariano groupchoicesseeminglyatoddswithindividualpreferences
AT sempogregory groupchoicesseeminglyatoddswithindividualpreferences
AT deneubourgjeanlouis groupchoicesseeminglyatoddswithindividualpreferences
AT planassitjaisaac groupchoicesseeminglyatoddswithindividualpreferences