Cargando…

Cross-sectional study of the hospital management of adult patients with a suspected seizure (EPIC2)

OBJECTIVE: To determine the clinical characteristics, management and outcomes of patients taken to hospital by emergency ambulance after a suspected seizure. DESIGN: Quantitative cross-sectional retrospective study of a consecutive series of patients. SETTING: An acute hospital trust in a large city...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dickson, Jon Mark, Dudhill, Hannah, Shewan, Jane, Mason, Sue, Grünewald, Richard A, Reuber, Markus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Open 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5541576/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28706099
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015696
_version_ 1783254838338912256
author Dickson, Jon Mark
Dudhill, Hannah
Shewan, Jane
Mason, Sue
Grünewald, Richard A
Reuber, Markus
author_facet Dickson, Jon Mark
Dudhill, Hannah
Shewan, Jane
Mason, Sue
Grünewald, Richard A
Reuber, Markus
author_sort Dickson, Jon Mark
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To determine the clinical characteristics, management and outcomes of patients taken to hospital by emergency ambulance after a suspected seizure. DESIGN: Quantitative cross-sectional retrospective study of a consecutive series of patients. SETTING: An acute hospital trust in a large city in England. PARTICIPANTS: In 2012–2013, the regions’ ambulance service managed 605 481 emergency incidents, 74 141/605 481 originated from Sheffield (a large city in the region), 2121/74 141 (2.9%) were suspected seizures and 178/2121 occurred in May 2012. We undertook detailed analysis of the medical records of the 91/178 patients who were transported to the city’s acute hospital. After undertaking a retrospective review of the medical records, the best available aetiological explanation for the seizures was determined. RESULTS: The best available aetiological explanation for 74.7% (68/91) of the incidents was an epileptic seizure, 11.0% (10/91) were psychogenic non-epileptic seizures and 9.9% (9/91) were cardiogenic events. The epileptic seizures fall into the following four categories: first epileptic seizure (13.2%, 12/91), epileptic seizure with a historical diagnosis of epilepsy (30.8%, 28/91), recurrent epileptic seizures without a historical diagnosis of epilepsy (20.9%, 19/91) and acute symptomatic seizures (9.9%, 9/91). Of those with seizures (excluding cardiogenic events), 2.4% (2/82) of patients were seizing on arrival in the Emergency Department (ED), 19.5% (16/82) were postictal and 69.5% (57/82) were alert. 63.4% (52/82) were discharged at the end of their ED attendance and 36.5% (19/52) of these had no referral or follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Most suspected seizures are epileptic seizures but this is a diagnostically heterogeneous group. Only a small minority of patients require emergency medical care but most are transported to hospital. Few patients receive expert review and many are discharged home without referral to a specialist leaving them at risk of further seizures and the associated morbidity, mortality and health services costs of poorly controlled epilepsy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5541576
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Open
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55415762017-08-18 Cross-sectional study of the hospital management of adult patients with a suspected seizure (EPIC2) Dickson, Jon Mark Dudhill, Hannah Shewan, Jane Mason, Sue Grünewald, Richard A Reuber, Markus BMJ Open Neurology OBJECTIVE: To determine the clinical characteristics, management and outcomes of patients taken to hospital by emergency ambulance after a suspected seizure. DESIGN: Quantitative cross-sectional retrospective study of a consecutive series of patients. SETTING: An acute hospital trust in a large city in England. PARTICIPANTS: In 2012–2013, the regions’ ambulance service managed 605 481 emergency incidents, 74 141/605 481 originated from Sheffield (a large city in the region), 2121/74 141 (2.9%) were suspected seizures and 178/2121 occurred in May 2012. We undertook detailed analysis of the medical records of the 91/178 patients who were transported to the city’s acute hospital. After undertaking a retrospective review of the medical records, the best available aetiological explanation for the seizures was determined. RESULTS: The best available aetiological explanation for 74.7% (68/91) of the incidents was an epileptic seizure, 11.0% (10/91) were psychogenic non-epileptic seizures and 9.9% (9/91) were cardiogenic events. The epileptic seizures fall into the following four categories: first epileptic seizure (13.2%, 12/91), epileptic seizure with a historical diagnosis of epilepsy (30.8%, 28/91), recurrent epileptic seizures without a historical diagnosis of epilepsy (20.9%, 19/91) and acute symptomatic seizures (9.9%, 9/91). Of those with seizures (excluding cardiogenic events), 2.4% (2/82) of patients were seizing on arrival in the Emergency Department (ED), 19.5% (16/82) were postictal and 69.5% (57/82) were alert. 63.4% (52/82) were discharged at the end of their ED attendance and 36.5% (19/52) of these had no referral or follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Most suspected seizures are epileptic seizures but this is a diagnostically heterogeneous group. Only a small minority of patients require emergency medical care but most are transported to hospital. Few patients receive expert review and many are discharged home without referral to a specialist leaving them at risk of further seizures and the associated morbidity, mortality and health services costs of poorly controlled epilepsy. BMJ Open 2017-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5541576/ /pubmed/28706099 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015696 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Neurology
Dickson, Jon Mark
Dudhill, Hannah
Shewan, Jane
Mason, Sue
Grünewald, Richard A
Reuber, Markus
Cross-sectional study of the hospital management of adult patients with a suspected seizure (EPIC2)
title Cross-sectional study of the hospital management of adult patients with a suspected seizure (EPIC2)
title_full Cross-sectional study of the hospital management of adult patients with a suspected seizure (EPIC2)
title_fullStr Cross-sectional study of the hospital management of adult patients with a suspected seizure (EPIC2)
title_full_unstemmed Cross-sectional study of the hospital management of adult patients with a suspected seizure (EPIC2)
title_short Cross-sectional study of the hospital management of adult patients with a suspected seizure (EPIC2)
title_sort cross-sectional study of the hospital management of adult patients with a suspected seizure (epic2)
topic Neurology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5541576/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28706099
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015696
work_keys_str_mv AT dicksonjonmark crosssectionalstudyofthehospitalmanagementofadultpatientswithasuspectedseizureepic2
AT dudhillhannah crosssectionalstudyofthehospitalmanagementofadultpatientswithasuspectedseizureepic2
AT shewanjane crosssectionalstudyofthehospitalmanagementofadultpatientswithasuspectedseizureepic2
AT masonsue crosssectionalstudyofthehospitalmanagementofadultpatientswithasuspectedseizureepic2
AT grunewaldricharda crosssectionalstudyofthehospitalmanagementofadultpatientswithasuspectedseizureepic2
AT reubermarkus crosssectionalstudyofthehospitalmanagementofadultpatientswithasuspectedseizureepic2