Cargando…
Words do matter: a systematic review on how different terminology for the same condition influences management preferences
OBJECTIVES: Changing terminology for low-risk, screen-detected conditions has now been recommended by several expert groups in order to prevent overdiagnosis and reduce the associated harms of overtreatment. However, the effect of terminology on patients’ preferences for management is not well under...
Autores principales: | Nickel, Brooke, Barratt, Alexandra, Copp, Tessa, Moynihan, Ray, McCaffery, Kirsten |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5541578/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28698318 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014129 |
Ejemplares similares
-
How different terminology for ductal carcinoma in situ impacts women's concern and treatment preferences: a randomised comparison within a national community survey
por: McCaffery, Kirsten, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Public perceptions of changing the terminology for low-risk thyroid cancer: a qualitative focus group study
por: Nickel, Brooke, et al.
Publicado: (2019) -
Interventions to improve media coverage of medical research: a codesigned feasibility and acceptability study with Australian journalists
por: Copp, Tessa, et al.
Publicado: (2022) -
What do you think overdiagnosis means? A qualitative analysis of responses from a national community survey of Australians
por: Moynihan, Ray, et al.
Publicado: (2015) -
Media coverage of calls to rename low-risk cancers: a content analysis
por: Nickel, Brooke, et al.
Publicado: (2020)