Cargando…
Liver cirrhosis in England—an observational study: are we measuring its burden occurrence correctly?
OBJECTIVES: Mortality due to liver disease (of which cirrhosis is the end stage) is increasing more than any other chronic condition in the UK. This study aims to demonstrate that (1) exclusive reliance on mortality rates may not reveal the true burden of liver cirrhosis, and (2) diverse use of diag...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Publishing Group
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5541611/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28710203 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013752 |
_version_ | 1783254846465376256 |
---|---|
author | Ratib, Sonia West, Joe Fleming, Kate M |
author_facet | Ratib, Sonia West, Joe Fleming, Kate M |
author_sort | Ratib, Sonia |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVES: Mortality due to liver disease (of which cirrhosis is the end stage) is increasing more than any other chronic condition in the UK. This study aims to demonstrate that (1) exclusive reliance on mortality rates may not reveal the true burden of liver cirrhosis, and (2) diverse use of diagnostic coding may produce misleading estimates. DESIGN: Observational study. SETTING: The Office for National Statistics death registry was interrogated to investigate liver cirrhosis mortality trends in England and Wales from 1968 to 2011. MAIN OUTCOME: Standardised mortality trends according to three different definitions of liver cirrhosis based on the specificity of diagnostic codes were calculated: 1 (chronic liver diseases), 2 (alcoholic and unspecified cirrhosis only) and 3 (cirrhosis as end-stage liver disease). The mortality trends were compared with incidence rates established in a previous population-based study (based on definition 3), from 1998 to 2009, to investigate discrepancies between these two measures. RESULTS: Over the study period, the overall standardised liver cirrhosis mortality rates were 8.8, 5,1 and 5.4 per 100 000 person-years for definitions 1, 2 and 3, respectively. The mortality rates for definition 3 in 1998 and 2009 were 6.2 and 5.9 per 100 000 person-years, respectively; while the equivalent incidence rates were at least threefold and sixfold higher: 23.4 and 35.9 per 100 000 person-years, respectively. This discrepancy between incidence and mortality rates was also at least threefold in men and women separately and across age groups. CONCLUSION: Mortality rates underestimated the incidence of liver cirrhosis by at least threefold between 1998 and 2009 and varied with differing definitions of disease. Mortality data should not be used exclusively as an indicator for the occurrence of liver cirrhosis in the population. Routinely collected healthcare data are available to measure occurrence of this disease. Careful consideration should be taken when selecting diagnostic codes for cirrhosis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5541611 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BMJ Publishing Group |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55416112017-08-18 Liver cirrhosis in England—an observational study: are we measuring its burden occurrence correctly? Ratib, Sonia West, Joe Fleming, Kate M BMJ Open Gastroenterology and Hepatology OBJECTIVES: Mortality due to liver disease (of which cirrhosis is the end stage) is increasing more than any other chronic condition in the UK. This study aims to demonstrate that (1) exclusive reliance on mortality rates may not reveal the true burden of liver cirrhosis, and (2) diverse use of diagnostic coding may produce misleading estimates. DESIGN: Observational study. SETTING: The Office for National Statistics death registry was interrogated to investigate liver cirrhosis mortality trends in England and Wales from 1968 to 2011. MAIN OUTCOME: Standardised mortality trends according to three different definitions of liver cirrhosis based on the specificity of diagnostic codes were calculated: 1 (chronic liver diseases), 2 (alcoholic and unspecified cirrhosis only) and 3 (cirrhosis as end-stage liver disease). The mortality trends were compared with incidence rates established in a previous population-based study (based on definition 3), from 1998 to 2009, to investigate discrepancies between these two measures. RESULTS: Over the study period, the overall standardised liver cirrhosis mortality rates were 8.8, 5,1 and 5.4 per 100 000 person-years for definitions 1, 2 and 3, respectively. The mortality rates for definition 3 in 1998 and 2009 were 6.2 and 5.9 per 100 000 person-years, respectively; while the equivalent incidence rates were at least threefold and sixfold higher: 23.4 and 35.9 per 100 000 person-years, respectively. This discrepancy between incidence and mortality rates was also at least threefold in men and women separately and across age groups. CONCLUSION: Mortality rates underestimated the incidence of liver cirrhosis by at least threefold between 1998 and 2009 and varied with differing definitions of disease. Mortality data should not be used exclusively as an indicator for the occurrence of liver cirrhosis in the population. Routinely collected healthcare data are available to measure occurrence of this disease. Careful consideration should be taken when selecting diagnostic codes for cirrhosis. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-07-13 /pmc/articles/PMC5541611/ /pubmed/28710203 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013752 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Gastroenterology and Hepatology Ratib, Sonia West, Joe Fleming, Kate M Liver cirrhosis in England—an observational study: are we measuring its burden occurrence correctly? |
title | Liver cirrhosis in England—an observational study: are we measuring its burden occurrence correctly? |
title_full | Liver cirrhosis in England—an observational study: are we measuring its burden occurrence correctly? |
title_fullStr | Liver cirrhosis in England—an observational study: are we measuring its burden occurrence correctly? |
title_full_unstemmed | Liver cirrhosis in England—an observational study: are we measuring its burden occurrence correctly? |
title_short | Liver cirrhosis in England—an observational study: are we measuring its burden occurrence correctly? |
title_sort | liver cirrhosis in england—an observational study: are we measuring its burden occurrence correctly? |
topic | Gastroenterology and Hepatology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5541611/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28710203 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-013752 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ratibsonia livercirrhosisinenglandanobservationalstudyarewemeasuringitsburdenoccurrencecorrectly AT westjoe livercirrhosisinenglandanobservationalstudyarewemeasuringitsburdenoccurrencecorrectly AT flemingkatem livercirrhosisinenglandanobservationalstudyarewemeasuringitsburdenoccurrencecorrectly |