Cargando…

Understanding how and why audits work: protocol for a realist review of audit programmes to improve hospital care

INTRODUCTION: Many types of audits are commonly used in hospital care to promote quality improvements. However, the evidence on the effectiveness of audits is mixed. The objectives of this proposed realist review are (1) to understand how and why audits might, or might not, work in terms of deliveri...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hut-Mossel, Lisanne, Welker, Gera, Ahaus, Kees, Gans, Rijk
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5541620/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28615270
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015121
_version_ 1783254848382173184
author Hut-Mossel, Lisanne
Welker, Gera
Ahaus, Kees
Gans, Rijk
author_facet Hut-Mossel, Lisanne
Welker, Gera
Ahaus, Kees
Gans, Rijk
author_sort Hut-Mossel, Lisanne
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Many types of audits are commonly used in hospital care to promote quality improvements. However, the evidence on the effectiveness of audits is mixed. The objectives of this proposed realist review are (1) to understand how and why audits might, or might not, work in terms of delivering the intended outcome of improved quality of hospital care and (2) to examine under what circumstances audits could potentially be effective. This protocol will provide the rationale for using a realist review approach and outline the method. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This review will be conducted using an iterative four-stage approach. The first and second steps have already been executed. The first step was to develop an initial programme theory based on the literature that explains how audits are supposed to work. Second, a systematic literature search was conducted using relevant databases. Third, data will be extracted and coded for concepts relating to context, outcomes and their interrelatedness. Finally, the data will be synthesised in a five-step process: (1) organising the extracted data into evidence tables, (2) theming, (3) formulating chains of inference from the identified themes, (4) linking the chains of inference and formulating CMO configurations and (5) refining the initial programme theory. The reporting of the review will follow the ‘Realist and Meta-Review Evidence Synthesis: Evolving Standards’ (RAMESES) publication standards. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This review does not require formal ethical approval. A better understanding of how and why these audits work, and how context impacts their effectiveness, will inform stakeholders in deciding how to tailor and implement audits within their local context. We will use a range of dissemination strategies to ensure that findings from this realist review are broadly disseminated to academic and non-academic audiences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42016039882.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5541620
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55416202017-08-07 Understanding how and why audits work: protocol for a realist review of audit programmes to improve hospital care Hut-Mossel, Lisanne Welker, Gera Ahaus, Kees Gans, Rijk BMJ Open Health Services Research INTRODUCTION: Many types of audits are commonly used in hospital care to promote quality improvements. However, the evidence on the effectiveness of audits is mixed. The objectives of this proposed realist review are (1) to understand how and why audits might, or might not, work in terms of delivering the intended outcome of improved quality of hospital care and (2) to examine under what circumstances audits could potentially be effective. This protocol will provide the rationale for using a realist review approach and outline the method. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This review will be conducted using an iterative four-stage approach. The first and second steps have already been executed. The first step was to develop an initial programme theory based on the literature that explains how audits are supposed to work. Second, a systematic literature search was conducted using relevant databases. Third, data will be extracted and coded for concepts relating to context, outcomes and their interrelatedness. Finally, the data will be synthesised in a five-step process: (1) organising the extracted data into evidence tables, (2) theming, (3) formulating chains of inference from the identified themes, (4) linking the chains of inference and formulating CMO configurations and (5) refining the initial programme theory. The reporting of the review will follow the ‘Realist and Meta-Review Evidence Synthesis: Evolving Standards’ (RAMESES) publication standards. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This review does not require formal ethical approval. A better understanding of how and why these audits work, and how context impacts their effectiveness, will inform stakeholders in deciding how to tailor and implement audits within their local context. We will use a range of dissemination strategies to ensure that findings from this realist review are broadly disseminated to academic and non-academic audiences. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42016039882. BMJ Publishing Group 2017-06-14 /pmc/articles/PMC5541620/ /pubmed/28615270 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015121 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Health Services Research
Hut-Mossel, Lisanne
Welker, Gera
Ahaus, Kees
Gans, Rijk
Understanding how and why audits work: protocol for a realist review of audit programmes to improve hospital care
title Understanding how and why audits work: protocol for a realist review of audit programmes to improve hospital care
title_full Understanding how and why audits work: protocol for a realist review of audit programmes to improve hospital care
title_fullStr Understanding how and why audits work: protocol for a realist review of audit programmes to improve hospital care
title_full_unstemmed Understanding how and why audits work: protocol for a realist review of audit programmes to improve hospital care
title_short Understanding how and why audits work: protocol for a realist review of audit programmes to improve hospital care
title_sort understanding how and why audits work: protocol for a realist review of audit programmes to improve hospital care
topic Health Services Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5541620/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28615270
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015121
work_keys_str_mv AT hutmossellisanne understandinghowandwhyauditsworkprotocolforarealistreviewofauditprogrammestoimprovehospitalcare
AT welkergera understandinghowandwhyauditsworkprotocolforarealistreviewofauditprogrammestoimprovehospitalcare
AT ahauskees understandinghowandwhyauditsworkprotocolforarealistreviewofauditprogrammestoimprovehospitalcare
AT gansrijk understandinghowandwhyauditsworkprotocolforarealistreviewofauditprogrammestoimprovehospitalcare