Cargando…
The effect of blinding on estimates of mortality in randomised clinical trials of intensive care interventions: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
INTRODUCTION: Evidence exists that unblinded randomised clinical trials (RCTs) overestimate intervention effects compared with blinded RCTs. It has been suggested that this is less pronounced for objective (ie, not subject to interpretation) outcome measures, including mortality. This may not apply...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BMJ Open
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5541632/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28701412 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016187 |
_version_ | 1783254850979495936 |
---|---|
author | Anthon, Carl Thomas Granholm, Anders Perner, Anders Laake, Jon Henrik Møller, Morten Hylander |
author_facet | Anthon, Carl Thomas Granholm, Anders Perner, Anders Laake, Jon Henrik Møller, Morten Hylander |
author_sort | Anthon, Carl Thomas |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Evidence exists that unblinded randomised clinical trials (RCTs) overestimate intervention effects compared with blinded RCTs. It has been suggested that this is less pronounced for objective (ie, not subject to interpretation) outcome measures, including mortality. This may not apply in the intensive care unit (ICU), as most deaths are preceded by decisions to withhold or withdraw treatments. Lack of blinding of physicians in RCTs of ICU interventions may potentially influence the decision towards a higher threshold for discontinuing treatment in patients who receive the investigational treatment and/or a lower threshold for discontinuing treatment in patients who receive the comparator (control). This may have important implications for patients, caregivers, researchers and society. Accordingly, we aim to assess whether lack of blinding affects mortality effect estimates in RCTs of ICU interventions. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct a systematic review with meta-analyses and assess the effect of blinding versus no blinding on mortality effect estimates in RCTs of interventions used in adult ICU patients. We will systematically search the Cochrane Library for systematic reviews reporting mortality effect estimates of any intervention used in adult ICU patients which includes at least one RCT with ‘low risk of bias’ in the bias domains ‘blinding of participants and personnel’ and/or ‘blinding of outcome assessment’ and one RCT with ‘unclear’ or ‘high risk of bias’ in the same bias domain(s). For each intervention, we will compare summary mortality effect estimates in blinded versus unblinded trials. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This research does not require ethical approval as we will use summary data from trials already approved by relevant ethical institutions. We will report the results in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement and submit the final paper to an international peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO, registration number: CRD42017056212. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5541632 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | BMJ Open |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55416322017-08-18 The effect of blinding on estimates of mortality in randomised clinical trials of intensive care interventions: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis Anthon, Carl Thomas Granholm, Anders Perner, Anders Laake, Jon Henrik Møller, Morten Hylander BMJ Open Intensive Care INTRODUCTION: Evidence exists that unblinded randomised clinical trials (RCTs) overestimate intervention effects compared with blinded RCTs. It has been suggested that this is less pronounced for objective (ie, not subject to interpretation) outcome measures, including mortality. This may not apply in the intensive care unit (ICU), as most deaths are preceded by decisions to withhold or withdraw treatments. Lack of blinding of physicians in RCTs of ICU interventions may potentially influence the decision towards a higher threshold for discontinuing treatment in patients who receive the investigational treatment and/or a lower threshold for discontinuing treatment in patients who receive the comparator (control). This may have important implications for patients, caregivers, researchers and society. Accordingly, we aim to assess whether lack of blinding affects mortality effect estimates in RCTs of ICU interventions. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct a systematic review with meta-analyses and assess the effect of blinding versus no blinding on mortality effect estimates in RCTs of interventions used in adult ICU patients. We will systematically search the Cochrane Library for systematic reviews reporting mortality effect estimates of any intervention used in adult ICU patients which includes at least one RCT with ‘low risk of bias’ in the bias domains ‘blinding of participants and personnel’ and/or ‘blinding of outcome assessment’ and one RCT with ‘unclear’ or ‘high risk of bias’ in the same bias domain(s). For each intervention, we will compare summary mortality effect estimates in blinded versus unblinded trials. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This research does not require ethical approval as we will use summary data from trials already approved by relevant ethical institutions. We will report the results in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement and submit the final paper to an international peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO, registration number: CRD42017056212. BMJ Open 2017-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5541632/ /pubmed/28701412 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016187 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
spellingShingle | Intensive Care Anthon, Carl Thomas Granholm, Anders Perner, Anders Laake, Jon Henrik Møller, Morten Hylander The effect of blinding on estimates of mortality in randomised clinical trials of intensive care interventions: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title | The effect of blinding on estimates of mortality in randomised clinical trials of intensive care interventions: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full | The effect of blinding on estimates of mortality in randomised clinical trials of intensive care interventions: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | The effect of blinding on estimates of mortality in randomised clinical trials of intensive care interventions: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | The effect of blinding on estimates of mortality in randomised clinical trials of intensive care interventions: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_short | The effect of blinding on estimates of mortality in randomised clinical trials of intensive care interventions: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | effect of blinding on estimates of mortality in randomised clinical trials of intensive care interventions: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis |
topic | Intensive Care |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5541632/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28701412 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016187 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT anthoncarlthomas theeffectofblindingonestimatesofmortalityinrandomisedclinicaltrialsofintensivecareinterventionsprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT granholmanders theeffectofblindingonestimatesofmortalityinrandomisedclinicaltrialsofintensivecareinterventionsprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT perneranders theeffectofblindingonestimatesofmortalityinrandomisedclinicaltrialsofintensivecareinterventionsprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT laakejonhenrik theeffectofblindingonestimatesofmortalityinrandomisedclinicaltrialsofintensivecareinterventionsprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT møllermortenhylander theeffectofblindingonestimatesofmortalityinrandomisedclinicaltrialsofintensivecareinterventionsprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT anthoncarlthomas effectofblindingonestimatesofmortalityinrandomisedclinicaltrialsofintensivecareinterventionsprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT granholmanders effectofblindingonestimatesofmortalityinrandomisedclinicaltrialsofintensivecareinterventionsprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT perneranders effectofblindingonestimatesofmortalityinrandomisedclinicaltrialsofintensivecareinterventionsprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT laakejonhenrik effectofblindingonestimatesofmortalityinrandomisedclinicaltrialsofintensivecareinterventionsprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis AT møllermortenhylander effectofblindingonestimatesofmortalityinrandomisedclinicaltrialsofintensivecareinterventionsprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis |