Cargando…

The effect of blinding on estimates of mortality in randomised clinical trials of intensive care interventions: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION: Evidence exists that unblinded randomised clinical trials (RCTs) overestimate intervention effects compared with blinded RCTs. It has been suggested that this is less pronounced for objective (ie, not subject to interpretation) outcome measures, including mortality. This may not apply...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Anthon, Carl Thomas, Granholm, Anders, Perner, Anders, Laake, Jon Henrik, Møller, Morten Hylander
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Open 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5541632/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28701412
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016187
_version_ 1783254850979495936
author Anthon, Carl Thomas
Granholm, Anders
Perner, Anders
Laake, Jon Henrik
Møller, Morten Hylander
author_facet Anthon, Carl Thomas
Granholm, Anders
Perner, Anders
Laake, Jon Henrik
Møller, Morten Hylander
author_sort Anthon, Carl Thomas
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Evidence exists that unblinded randomised clinical trials (RCTs) overestimate intervention effects compared with blinded RCTs. It has been suggested that this is less pronounced for objective (ie, not subject to interpretation) outcome measures, including mortality. This may not apply in the intensive care unit (ICU), as most deaths are preceded by decisions to withhold or withdraw treatments. Lack of blinding of physicians in RCTs of ICU interventions may potentially influence the decision towards a higher threshold for discontinuing treatment in patients who receive the investigational treatment and/or a lower threshold for discontinuing treatment in patients who receive the comparator (control). This may have important implications for patients, caregivers, researchers and society. Accordingly, we aim to assess whether lack of blinding affects mortality effect estimates in RCTs of ICU interventions. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct a systematic review with meta-analyses and assess the effect of blinding versus no blinding on mortality effect estimates in RCTs of interventions used in adult ICU patients. We will systematically search the Cochrane Library for systematic reviews reporting mortality effect estimates of any intervention used in adult ICU patients which includes at least one RCT with ‘low risk of bias’ in the bias domains ‘blinding of participants and personnel’ and/or ‘blinding of outcome assessment’ and one RCT with ‘unclear’ or ‘high risk of bias’ in the same bias domain(s). For each intervention, we will compare summary mortality effect estimates in blinded versus unblinded trials. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This research does not require ethical approval as we will use summary data from trials already approved by relevant ethical institutions. We will report the results in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement and submit the final paper to an international peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO, registration number: CRD42017056212.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5541632
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BMJ Open
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55416322017-08-18 The effect of blinding on estimates of mortality in randomised clinical trials of intensive care interventions: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis Anthon, Carl Thomas Granholm, Anders Perner, Anders Laake, Jon Henrik Møller, Morten Hylander BMJ Open Intensive Care INTRODUCTION: Evidence exists that unblinded randomised clinical trials (RCTs) overestimate intervention effects compared with blinded RCTs. It has been suggested that this is less pronounced for objective (ie, not subject to interpretation) outcome measures, including mortality. This may not apply in the intensive care unit (ICU), as most deaths are preceded by decisions to withhold or withdraw treatments. Lack of blinding of physicians in RCTs of ICU interventions may potentially influence the decision towards a higher threshold for discontinuing treatment in patients who receive the investigational treatment and/or a lower threshold for discontinuing treatment in patients who receive the comparator (control). This may have important implications for patients, caregivers, researchers and society. Accordingly, we aim to assess whether lack of blinding affects mortality effect estimates in RCTs of ICU interventions. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct a systematic review with meta-analyses and assess the effect of blinding versus no blinding on mortality effect estimates in RCTs of interventions used in adult ICU patients. We will systematically search the Cochrane Library for systematic reviews reporting mortality effect estimates of any intervention used in adult ICU patients which includes at least one RCT with ‘low risk of bias’ in the bias domains ‘blinding of participants and personnel’ and/or ‘blinding of outcome assessment’ and one RCT with ‘unclear’ or ‘high risk of bias’ in the same bias domain(s). For each intervention, we will compare summary mortality effect estimates in blinded versus unblinded trials. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This research does not require ethical approval as we will use summary data from trials already approved by relevant ethical institutions. We will report the results in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) statement and submit the final paper to an international peer-reviewed journal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO, registration number: CRD42017056212. BMJ Open 2017-07-11 /pmc/articles/PMC5541632/ /pubmed/28701412 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016187 Text en © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2017. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted. This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/
spellingShingle Intensive Care
Anthon, Carl Thomas
Granholm, Anders
Perner, Anders
Laake, Jon Henrik
Møller, Morten Hylander
The effect of blinding on estimates of mortality in randomised clinical trials of intensive care interventions: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title The effect of blinding on estimates of mortality in randomised clinical trials of intensive care interventions: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full The effect of blinding on estimates of mortality in randomised clinical trials of intensive care interventions: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr The effect of blinding on estimates of mortality in randomised clinical trials of intensive care interventions: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed The effect of blinding on estimates of mortality in randomised clinical trials of intensive care interventions: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_short The effect of blinding on estimates of mortality in randomised clinical trials of intensive care interventions: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort effect of blinding on estimates of mortality in randomised clinical trials of intensive care interventions: protocol for a systematic review and meta-analysis
topic Intensive Care
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5541632/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28701412
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-016187
work_keys_str_mv AT anthoncarlthomas theeffectofblindingonestimatesofmortalityinrandomisedclinicaltrialsofintensivecareinterventionsprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT granholmanders theeffectofblindingonestimatesofmortalityinrandomisedclinicaltrialsofintensivecareinterventionsprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT perneranders theeffectofblindingonestimatesofmortalityinrandomisedclinicaltrialsofintensivecareinterventionsprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT laakejonhenrik theeffectofblindingonestimatesofmortalityinrandomisedclinicaltrialsofintensivecareinterventionsprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT møllermortenhylander theeffectofblindingonestimatesofmortalityinrandomisedclinicaltrialsofintensivecareinterventionsprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT anthoncarlthomas effectofblindingonestimatesofmortalityinrandomisedclinicaltrialsofintensivecareinterventionsprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT granholmanders effectofblindingonestimatesofmortalityinrandomisedclinicaltrialsofintensivecareinterventionsprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT perneranders effectofblindingonestimatesofmortalityinrandomisedclinicaltrialsofintensivecareinterventionsprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT laakejonhenrik effectofblindingonestimatesofmortalityinrandomisedclinicaltrialsofintensivecareinterventionsprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis
AT møllermortenhylander effectofblindingonestimatesofmortalityinrandomisedclinicaltrialsofintensivecareinterventionsprotocolforasystematicreviewandmetaanalysis