Cargando…

The cost-utility of point-of-care troponin testing to diagnose acute coronary syndrome in primary care

BACKGROUND: The added value of using a point-of-care (POC) troponin test in primary care to rule out acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is debated because test sensitivity is inadequate early after symptom onset. This study investigates the potential cost-utility of diagnosing ACS by a general practition...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kip, Michelle M. A., Koffijberg, Hendrik, Moesker, Marco J., IJzerman, Maarten J., Kusters, Ron
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5541723/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28768475
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-017-0647-6
_version_ 1783254867458916352
author Kip, Michelle M. A.
Koffijberg, Hendrik
Moesker, Marco J.
IJzerman, Maarten J.
Kusters, Ron
author_facet Kip, Michelle M. A.
Koffijberg, Hendrik
Moesker, Marco J.
IJzerman, Maarten J.
Kusters, Ron
author_sort Kip, Michelle M. A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The added value of using a point-of-care (POC) troponin test in primary care to rule out acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is debated because test sensitivity is inadequate early after symptom onset. This study investigates the potential cost-utility of diagnosing ACS by a general practitioner (GP) when a POC troponin test is available versus GP assessment only. METHODS: A patient-level simulation model was developed, representing a hypothetical cohort of the Dutch population (>35 years) consulting the GP with chest complaints. All health related consequences as well as cost consequences were included. Both symptom duration, selection of patients in whom the POC troponin test is performed, and test performance at different time points were incorporated. Health outcomes were expressed as Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs). The main outcome parameters involve the effect of POC troponin testing on (in)correct hospital referrals, QALYs, and costs. RESULTS: The POC troponin strategy decreases the referral rate in non-ACS patients from 38.46% to 31.85%. Despite a small increase in non-referral among ACS patients from 0.22% to 0.27%, the overall health effect is negligible. Costs will decrease with €77.25/patient (95% CI €-126.81 to €-33.37). CONCLUSIONS: The POC troponin strategy is likely cost-saving, by reducing hospital referrals. The small increase in missed ACS patients can be partly explained by conservative assumptions used in the analysis. Besides, current developments in POC troponin tests will likely further improve their diagnostic performance. Therefore, future prospective studies are warranted to investigate whether those developments make the POC troponin test to a safe and cost-effective diagnostic tool for diagnosing ACS in general practices. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12872-017-0647-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5541723
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55417232017-08-07 The cost-utility of point-of-care troponin testing to diagnose acute coronary syndrome in primary care Kip, Michelle M. A. Koffijberg, Hendrik Moesker, Marco J. IJzerman, Maarten J. Kusters, Ron BMC Cardiovasc Disord Research Article BACKGROUND: The added value of using a point-of-care (POC) troponin test in primary care to rule out acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is debated because test sensitivity is inadequate early after symptom onset. This study investigates the potential cost-utility of diagnosing ACS by a general practitioner (GP) when a POC troponin test is available versus GP assessment only. METHODS: A patient-level simulation model was developed, representing a hypothetical cohort of the Dutch population (>35 years) consulting the GP with chest complaints. All health related consequences as well as cost consequences were included. Both symptom duration, selection of patients in whom the POC troponin test is performed, and test performance at different time points were incorporated. Health outcomes were expressed as Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs). The main outcome parameters involve the effect of POC troponin testing on (in)correct hospital referrals, QALYs, and costs. RESULTS: The POC troponin strategy decreases the referral rate in non-ACS patients from 38.46% to 31.85%. Despite a small increase in non-referral among ACS patients from 0.22% to 0.27%, the overall health effect is negligible. Costs will decrease with €77.25/patient (95% CI €-126.81 to €-33.37). CONCLUSIONS: The POC troponin strategy is likely cost-saving, by reducing hospital referrals. The small increase in missed ACS patients can be partly explained by conservative assumptions used in the analysis. Besides, current developments in POC troponin tests will likely further improve their diagnostic performance. Therefore, future prospective studies are warranted to investigate whether those developments make the POC troponin test to a safe and cost-effective diagnostic tool for diagnosing ACS in general practices. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12872-017-0647-6) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5541723/ /pubmed/28768475 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-017-0647-6 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kip, Michelle M. A.
Koffijberg, Hendrik
Moesker, Marco J.
IJzerman, Maarten J.
Kusters, Ron
The cost-utility of point-of-care troponin testing to diagnose acute coronary syndrome in primary care
title The cost-utility of point-of-care troponin testing to diagnose acute coronary syndrome in primary care
title_full The cost-utility of point-of-care troponin testing to diagnose acute coronary syndrome in primary care
title_fullStr The cost-utility of point-of-care troponin testing to diagnose acute coronary syndrome in primary care
title_full_unstemmed The cost-utility of point-of-care troponin testing to diagnose acute coronary syndrome in primary care
title_short The cost-utility of point-of-care troponin testing to diagnose acute coronary syndrome in primary care
title_sort cost-utility of point-of-care troponin testing to diagnose acute coronary syndrome in primary care
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5541723/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28768475
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12872-017-0647-6
work_keys_str_mv AT kipmichellema thecostutilityofpointofcaretroponintestingtodiagnoseacutecoronarysyndromeinprimarycare
AT koffijberghendrik thecostutilityofpointofcaretroponintestingtodiagnoseacutecoronarysyndromeinprimarycare
AT moeskermarcoj thecostutilityofpointofcaretroponintestingtodiagnoseacutecoronarysyndromeinprimarycare
AT ijzermanmaartenj thecostutilityofpointofcaretroponintestingtodiagnoseacutecoronarysyndromeinprimarycare
AT kustersron thecostutilityofpointofcaretroponintestingtodiagnoseacutecoronarysyndromeinprimarycare
AT kipmichellema costutilityofpointofcaretroponintestingtodiagnoseacutecoronarysyndromeinprimarycare
AT koffijberghendrik costutilityofpointofcaretroponintestingtodiagnoseacutecoronarysyndromeinprimarycare
AT moeskermarcoj costutilityofpointofcaretroponintestingtodiagnoseacutecoronarysyndromeinprimarycare
AT ijzermanmaartenj costutilityofpointofcaretroponintestingtodiagnoseacutecoronarysyndromeinprimarycare
AT kustersron costutilityofpointofcaretroponintestingtodiagnoseacutecoronarysyndromeinprimarycare