Cargando…

Five years’ experience of an annual course on implementation science: an evaluation among course participants

BACKGROUND: Increasing interest in implementation science has generated a demand for education and training opportunities for researchers and practitioners in the field. However, few implementation science courses have been described or evaluated in the scientific literature. The aim of the present...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carlfjord, Siw, Roback, Kerstin, Nilsen, Per
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5541724/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28768546
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0618-4
_version_ 1783254867689603072
author Carlfjord, Siw
Roback, Kerstin
Nilsen, Per
author_facet Carlfjord, Siw
Roback, Kerstin
Nilsen, Per
author_sort Carlfjord, Siw
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Increasing interest in implementation science has generated a demand for education and training opportunities for researchers and practitioners in the field. However, few implementation science courses have been described or evaluated in the scientific literature. The aim of the present study was to provide a short- and long-term evaluation of the implementation training at Linköping University, Sweden. METHODS: Two data collections were carried out. In connection with the final seminar, a course evaluation form, including six items on satisfaction and suggestions for improvement, was distributed to the course participants, a total of 101 students from 2011 to 2015 (data collection 1), response rate 72%. A questionnaire including six items was distributed by e-mail to the same students in autumn 2016 (data collection 2), response rate 63%. Data from the two data collections were presented descriptively and analysed using the Kirkpatrick model consisting of four levels: reaction, learning, behaviour and results. RESULTS: The students were very positive immediately after course participation, rating high on overall perception of the course and the contents (reaction). The students also rated high on achievement of the course objectives and considered their knowledge in implementation science to be very good and to a high degree due to course participation (learning). Knowledge gained from the course was viewed to be useful (behaviour) and was applied to a considerable extent in research projects and work apart from research activities (results). CONCLUSIONS: The evaluation of the doctoral-level implementation science course provided by Linköping University showed favourable results, both in the short and long term. The adapted version of the Kirkpatrick model was useful because it provided a structure for evaluation of the short- and long-term learning outcomes. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13012-017-0618-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5541724
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55417242017-08-07 Five years’ experience of an annual course on implementation science: an evaluation among course participants Carlfjord, Siw Roback, Kerstin Nilsen, Per Implement Sci Research BACKGROUND: Increasing interest in implementation science has generated a demand for education and training opportunities for researchers and practitioners in the field. However, few implementation science courses have been described or evaluated in the scientific literature. The aim of the present study was to provide a short- and long-term evaluation of the implementation training at Linköping University, Sweden. METHODS: Two data collections were carried out. In connection with the final seminar, a course evaluation form, including six items on satisfaction and suggestions for improvement, was distributed to the course participants, a total of 101 students from 2011 to 2015 (data collection 1), response rate 72%. A questionnaire including six items was distributed by e-mail to the same students in autumn 2016 (data collection 2), response rate 63%. Data from the two data collections were presented descriptively and analysed using the Kirkpatrick model consisting of four levels: reaction, learning, behaviour and results. RESULTS: The students were very positive immediately after course participation, rating high on overall perception of the course and the contents (reaction). The students also rated high on achievement of the course objectives and considered their knowledge in implementation science to be very good and to a high degree due to course participation (learning). Knowledge gained from the course was viewed to be useful (behaviour) and was applied to a considerable extent in research projects and work apart from research activities (results). CONCLUSIONS: The evaluation of the doctoral-level implementation science course provided by Linköping University showed favourable results, both in the short and long term. The adapted version of the Kirkpatrick model was useful because it provided a structure for evaluation of the short- and long-term learning outcomes. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13012-017-0618-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. BioMed Central 2017-08-02 /pmc/articles/PMC5541724/ /pubmed/28768546 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0618-4 Text en © The Author(s). 2017 Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Carlfjord, Siw
Roback, Kerstin
Nilsen, Per
Five years’ experience of an annual course on implementation science: an evaluation among course participants
title Five years’ experience of an annual course on implementation science: an evaluation among course participants
title_full Five years’ experience of an annual course on implementation science: an evaluation among course participants
title_fullStr Five years’ experience of an annual course on implementation science: an evaluation among course participants
title_full_unstemmed Five years’ experience of an annual course on implementation science: an evaluation among course participants
title_short Five years’ experience of an annual course on implementation science: an evaluation among course participants
title_sort five years’ experience of an annual course on implementation science: an evaluation among course participants
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5541724/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28768546
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13012-017-0618-4
work_keys_str_mv AT carlfjordsiw fiveyearsexperienceofanannualcourseonimplementationscienceanevaluationamongcourseparticipants
AT robackkerstin fiveyearsexperienceofanannualcourseonimplementationscienceanevaluationamongcourseparticipants
AT nilsenper fiveyearsexperienceofanannualcourseonimplementationscienceanevaluationamongcourseparticipants