Cargando…

Visual Evoked Potentials in Primary Open Angle Glaucoma

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Visual evoked potentials (VEPs) assess the integrity of the visual pathways from the optic nerve to the occipital cortex. Optic disc cupping and visual field loss have been associated with prolongation of latency of VEP in primary open angle glaucoma (POAG). METHODS: Pattern rev...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jha, Mukesh Kumar, Thakur, Dilip, Limbu, Nirmala, Badhu, Badri Prasad, Paudel, Bishnu Hari
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5541795/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28808597
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/9540609
_version_ 1783254879035195392
author Jha, Mukesh Kumar
Thakur, Dilip
Limbu, Nirmala
Badhu, Badri Prasad
Paudel, Bishnu Hari
author_facet Jha, Mukesh Kumar
Thakur, Dilip
Limbu, Nirmala
Badhu, Badri Prasad
Paudel, Bishnu Hari
author_sort Jha, Mukesh Kumar
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Visual evoked potentials (VEPs) assess the integrity of the visual pathways from the optic nerve to the occipital cortex. Optic disc cupping and visual field loss have been associated with prolongation of latency of VEP in primary open angle glaucoma (POAG). METHODS: Pattern reversal and flash VEP tests were done in consenting 20 primary open angle glaucoma eyes and 40 normal control eyes. RESULTS: In POAG cases, the refractive error [3.51 ± 1.88 versus 1.88 ± 1.11, D, p = 0.001], cup-disc ratio in percent [66.00 ± 16.98 versus 28.50 ± 5.80, p = 0.001], intraocular pressure [19.55 ± 2.08 versus 11.65 ± 1.64, mmHg, p = 0.001], and automated visual field pattern standard deviation [4.13 ± 6.96 versus 1.64 ± 0.45, dB, p = 0.001] were significantly more than in control. The visual acuity [0.41 ± 0.29 versus 1.00 ± 0.00, p = 0.001], foveal visual sensitivity [25.92 ± 6.88 versus 33.48 ± 1.75, dB, p = 0.001], and automated visual field mean deviation [−9.63 ± 10.58 versus 0.07 ± 1.54, dB, p = 0.001] were significantly less in cases than in control. Among VEP variables, pattern reversal latency N145 [149.00 ± 15.75 versus 137.52 ± 15.20, ms, p = 0.011], flash amplitude N75 [2.18 ± .57 versus 1.47 ± .38, μV, p = 0.001], and flash amplitude N145 [1.99 ± .39 versus 1.43 ± .38, μV, p = 0.001] were increased in cases. The pattern reversal amplitude N75 [1.97 ± .35 versus 2.47 ± .58, μV, p = 0.001], amplitude P100 [3.09 ± .46 versus 6.07 ± 1.44, μV, p = 0.001], and amplitude N145 [2.21 ± .58 versus 4.45 ± 1.99, μV, p = 0.001] were decreased in cases. CONCLUSIONS: POAG caused glaucomatous damage to optic pathway.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5541795
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55417952017-08-14 Visual Evoked Potentials in Primary Open Angle Glaucoma Jha, Mukesh Kumar Thakur, Dilip Limbu, Nirmala Badhu, Badri Prasad Paudel, Bishnu Hari J Neurodegener Dis Research Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Visual evoked potentials (VEPs) assess the integrity of the visual pathways from the optic nerve to the occipital cortex. Optic disc cupping and visual field loss have been associated with prolongation of latency of VEP in primary open angle glaucoma (POAG). METHODS: Pattern reversal and flash VEP tests were done in consenting 20 primary open angle glaucoma eyes and 40 normal control eyes. RESULTS: In POAG cases, the refractive error [3.51 ± 1.88 versus 1.88 ± 1.11, D, p = 0.001], cup-disc ratio in percent [66.00 ± 16.98 versus 28.50 ± 5.80, p = 0.001], intraocular pressure [19.55 ± 2.08 versus 11.65 ± 1.64, mmHg, p = 0.001], and automated visual field pattern standard deviation [4.13 ± 6.96 versus 1.64 ± 0.45, dB, p = 0.001] were significantly more than in control. The visual acuity [0.41 ± 0.29 versus 1.00 ± 0.00, p = 0.001], foveal visual sensitivity [25.92 ± 6.88 versus 33.48 ± 1.75, dB, p = 0.001], and automated visual field mean deviation [−9.63 ± 10.58 versus 0.07 ± 1.54, dB, p = 0.001] were significantly less in cases than in control. Among VEP variables, pattern reversal latency N145 [149.00 ± 15.75 versus 137.52 ± 15.20, ms, p = 0.011], flash amplitude N75 [2.18 ± .57 versus 1.47 ± .38, μV, p = 0.001], and flash amplitude N145 [1.99 ± .39 versus 1.43 ± .38, μV, p = 0.001] were increased in cases. The pattern reversal amplitude N75 [1.97 ± .35 versus 2.47 ± .58, μV, p = 0.001], amplitude P100 [3.09 ± .46 versus 6.07 ± 1.44, μV, p = 0.001], and amplitude N145 [2.21 ± .58 versus 4.45 ± 1.99, μV, p = 0.001] were decreased in cases. CONCLUSIONS: POAG caused glaucomatous damage to optic pathway. Hindawi 2017 2017-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5541795/ /pubmed/28808597 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/9540609 Text en Copyright © 2017 Mukesh Kumar Jha et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Jha, Mukesh Kumar
Thakur, Dilip
Limbu, Nirmala
Badhu, Badri Prasad
Paudel, Bishnu Hari
Visual Evoked Potentials in Primary Open Angle Glaucoma
title Visual Evoked Potentials in Primary Open Angle Glaucoma
title_full Visual Evoked Potentials in Primary Open Angle Glaucoma
title_fullStr Visual Evoked Potentials in Primary Open Angle Glaucoma
title_full_unstemmed Visual Evoked Potentials in Primary Open Angle Glaucoma
title_short Visual Evoked Potentials in Primary Open Angle Glaucoma
title_sort visual evoked potentials in primary open angle glaucoma
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5541795/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28808597
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/9540609
work_keys_str_mv AT jhamukeshkumar visualevokedpotentialsinprimaryopenangleglaucoma
AT thakurdilip visualevokedpotentialsinprimaryopenangleglaucoma
AT limbunirmala visualevokedpotentialsinprimaryopenangleglaucoma
AT badhubadriprasad visualevokedpotentialsinprimaryopenangleglaucoma
AT paudelbishnuhari visualevokedpotentialsinprimaryopenangleglaucoma