Cargando…
Visual Evoked Potentials in Primary Open Angle Glaucoma
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Visual evoked potentials (VEPs) assess the integrity of the visual pathways from the optic nerve to the occipital cortex. Optic disc cupping and visual field loss have been associated with prolongation of latency of VEP in primary open angle glaucoma (POAG). METHODS: Pattern rev...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5541795/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28808597 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/9540609 |
_version_ | 1783254879035195392 |
---|---|
author | Jha, Mukesh Kumar Thakur, Dilip Limbu, Nirmala Badhu, Badri Prasad Paudel, Bishnu Hari |
author_facet | Jha, Mukesh Kumar Thakur, Dilip Limbu, Nirmala Badhu, Badri Prasad Paudel, Bishnu Hari |
author_sort | Jha, Mukesh Kumar |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Visual evoked potentials (VEPs) assess the integrity of the visual pathways from the optic nerve to the occipital cortex. Optic disc cupping and visual field loss have been associated with prolongation of latency of VEP in primary open angle glaucoma (POAG). METHODS: Pattern reversal and flash VEP tests were done in consenting 20 primary open angle glaucoma eyes and 40 normal control eyes. RESULTS: In POAG cases, the refractive error [3.51 ± 1.88 versus 1.88 ± 1.11, D, p = 0.001], cup-disc ratio in percent [66.00 ± 16.98 versus 28.50 ± 5.80, p = 0.001], intraocular pressure [19.55 ± 2.08 versus 11.65 ± 1.64, mmHg, p = 0.001], and automated visual field pattern standard deviation [4.13 ± 6.96 versus 1.64 ± 0.45, dB, p = 0.001] were significantly more than in control. The visual acuity [0.41 ± 0.29 versus 1.00 ± 0.00, p = 0.001], foveal visual sensitivity [25.92 ± 6.88 versus 33.48 ± 1.75, dB, p = 0.001], and automated visual field mean deviation [−9.63 ± 10.58 versus 0.07 ± 1.54, dB, p = 0.001] were significantly less in cases than in control. Among VEP variables, pattern reversal latency N145 [149.00 ± 15.75 versus 137.52 ± 15.20, ms, p = 0.011], flash amplitude N75 [2.18 ± .57 versus 1.47 ± .38, μV, p = 0.001], and flash amplitude N145 [1.99 ± .39 versus 1.43 ± .38, μV, p = 0.001] were increased in cases. The pattern reversal amplitude N75 [1.97 ± .35 versus 2.47 ± .58, μV, p = 0.001], amplitude P100 [3.09 ± .46 versus 6.07 ± 1.44, μV, p = 0.001], and amplitude N145 [2.21 ± .58 versus 4.45 ± 1.99, μV, p = 0.001] were decreased in cases. CONCLUSIONS: POAG caused glaucomatous damage to optic pathway. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5541795 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55417952017-08-14 Visual Evoked Potentials in Primary Open Angle Glaucoma Jha, Mukesh Kumar Thakur, Dilip Limbu, Nirmala Badhu, Badri Prasad Paudel, Bishnu Hari J Neurodegener Dis Research Article BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Visual evoked potentials (VEPs) assess the integrity of the visual pathways from the optic nerve to the occipital cortex. Optic disc cupping and visual field loss have been associated with prolongation of latency of VEP in primary open angle glaucoma (POAG). METHODS: Pattern reversal and flash VEP tests were done in consenting 20 primary open angle glaucoma eyes and 40 normal control eyes. RESULTS: In POAG cases, the refractive error [3.51 ± 1.88 versus 1.88 ± 1.11, D, p = 0.001], cup-disc ratio in percent [66.00 ± 16.98 versus 28.50 ± 5.80, p = 0.001], intraocular pressure [19.55 ± 2.08 versus 11.65 ± 1.64, mmHg, p = 0.001], and automated visual field pattern standard deviation [4.13 ± 6.96 versus 1.64 ± 0.45, dB, p = 0.001] were significantly more than in control. The visual acuity [0.41 ± 0.29 versus 1.00 ± 0.00, p = 0.001], foveal visual sensitivity [25.92 ± 6.88 versus 33.48 ± 1.75, dB, p = 0.001], and automated visual field mean deviation [−9.63 ± 10.58 versus 0.07 ± 1.54, dB, p = 0.001] were significantly less in cases than in control. Among VEP variables, pattern reversal latency N145 [149.00 ± 15.75 versus 137.52 ± 15.20, ms, p = 0.011], flash amplitude N75 [2.18 ± .57 versus 1.47 ± .38, μV, p = 0.001], and flash amplitude N145 [1.99 ± .39 versus 1.43 ± .38, μV, p = 0.001] were increased in cases. The pattern reversal amplitude N75 [1.97 ± .35 versus 2.47 ± .58, μV, p = 0.001], amplitude P100 [3.09 ± .46 versus 6.07 ± 1.44, μV, p = 0.001], and amplitude N145 [2.21 ± .58 versus 4.45 ± 1.99, μV, p = 0.001] were decreased in cases. CONCLUSIONS: POAG caused glaucomatous damage to optic pathway. Hindawi 2017 2017-07-20 /pmc/articles/PMC5541795/ /pubmed/28808597 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/9540609 Text en Copyright © 2017 Mukesh Kumar Jha et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Jha, Mukesh Kumar Thakur, Dilip Limbu, Nirmala Badhu, Badri Prasad Paudel, Bishnu Hari Visual Evoked Potentials in Primary Open Angle Glaucoma |
title | Visual Evoked Potentials in Primary Open Angle Glaucoma |
title_full | Visual Evoked Potentials in Primary Open Angle Glaucoma |
title_fullStr | Visual Evoked Potentials in Primary Open Angle Glaucoma |
title_full_unstemmed | Visual Evoked Potentials in Primary Open Angle Glaucoma |
title_short | Visual Evoked Potentials in Primary Open Angle Glaucoma |
title_sort | visual evoked potentials in primary open angle glaucoma |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5541795/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28808597 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2017/9540609 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jhamukeshkumar visualevokedpotentialsinprimaryopenangleglaucoma AT thakurdilip visualevokedpotentialsinprimaryopenangleglaucoma AT limbunirmala visualevokedpotentialsinprimaryopenangleglaucoma AT badhubadriprasad visualevokedpotentialsinprimaryopenangleglaucoma AT paudelbishnuhari visualevokedpotentialsinprimaryopenangleglaucoma |