Cargando…
Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX for borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma: improved efficacy compared with gemcitabine-based regimen
Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) is a potentially resectable disease but is associated with poorer survival compared to primary resectable disease. There has been no prospective trial that compare the efficacy of FOLFIRNOX and gemcitabine-based regimen for BRPC. Between February 2013 a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Impact Journals LLC
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5542271/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28564637 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.17940 |
_version_ | 1783254957292519424 |
---|---|
author | Yoo, Changhoon Kang, Jihoon Kim, Kyu-Pyo Lee, Jae-Lyun Ryoo, Baek-Yeol Chang, Heung-Moon Lee, Sang Soo Park, Do Hyun Song, Tae Jun Seo, Dong Wan Lee, Sung Koo Kim, Myung-Hwan Park, Jin-Hong Hwang, Dae Wook Song, Ki Byung Lee, Jae Hoon Kim, Song Cheol |
author_facet | Yoo, Changhoon Kang, Jihoon Kim, Kyu-Pyo Lee, Jae-Lyun Ryoo, Baek-Yeol Chang, Heung-Moon Lee, Sang Soo Park, Do Hyun Song, Tae Jun Seo, Dong Wan Lee, Sung Koo Kim, Myung-Hwan Park, Jin-Hong Hwang, Dae Wook Song, Ki Byung Lee, Jae Hoon Kim, Song Cheol |
author_sort | Yoo, Changhoon |
collection | PubMed |
description | Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) is a potentially resectable disease but is associated with poorer survival compared to primary resectable disease. There has been no prospective trial that compare the efficacy of FOLFIRNOX and gemcitabine-based regimen for BRPC. Between February 2013 and December 2014, 18 patients with BRPC receiving FOLFIRINOX were reviewed retrospectively. For comparative analysis, data for all BRPC patients (n=18) in our previous phase 2 study of neoadjuvant fixed-dose rate-gemcitabine plus capecitabine were pooled. Patients received a median 6 cycles (range, 3-13) of FOLFIRINOX. Surgical resection was performed in 12 patients (67%) and R0 resection in 9 patients. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 16.8 (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.4-24.2) and 21.2 (95% CI, 14.2-28.2) months, respectively. Patients who underwent surgical resection showed significantly better PFS (p=0.01) and OS (p=0.003) than those unresected. In the exploratory analysis, patients receiving FOLFIRINOX showed significantly longer PFS compared to those receiving fixed-dose rate-gemcitabine plus capecitabine (median 16.8 months [95% CI, 9.4-24.2] vs. 6.5 months [1.6-11.3]; p = 0.04). There was a trend toward improved OS in patients who received FOLFIRINOX (median 21.2 months [95% CI, 14.2-28.2]) compared to those who received fixed-dose rate-gemcitabine plus capecitabine (13.6 months [11.8–15.4]; p=0.12). FOLFIRINOX was feasible and effective as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with BRPC and may have improved efficacy compared to a gemcitabine-based regimen. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5542271 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Impact Journals LLC |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55422712017-08-07 Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX for borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma: improved efficacy compared with gemcitabine-based regimen Yoo, Changhoon Kang, Jihoon Kim, Kyu-Pyo Lee, Jae-Lyun Ryoo, Baek-Yeol Chang, Heung-Moon Lee, Sang Soo Park, Do Hyun Song, Tae Jun Seo, Dong Wan Lee, Sung Koo Kim, Myung-Hwan Park, Jin-Hong Hwang, Dae Wook Song, Ki Byung Lee, Jae Hoon Kim, Song Cheol Oncotarget Research Paper Borderline resectable pancreatic cancer (BRPC) is a potentially resectable disease but is associated with poorer survival compared to primary resectable disease. There has been no prospective trial that compare the efficacy of FOLFIRNOX and gemcitabine-based regimen for BRPC. Between February 2013 and December 2014, 18 patients with BRPC receiving FOLFIRINOX were reviewed retrospectively. For comparative analysis, data for all BRPC patients (n=18) in our previous phase 2 study of neoadjuvant fixed-dose rate-gemcitabine plus capecitabine were pooled. Patients received a median 6 cycles (range, 3-13) of FOLFIRINOX. Surgical resection was performed in 12 patients (67%) and R0 resection in 9 patients. Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 16.8 (95% confidence interval [CI], 9.4-24.2) and 21.2 (95% CI, 14.2-28.2) months, respectively. Patients who underwent surgical resection showed significantly better PFS (p=0.01) and OS (p=0.003) than those unresected. In the exploratory analysis, patients receiving FOLFIRINOX showed significantly longer PFS compared to those receiving fixed-dose rate-gemcitabine plus capecitabine (median 16.8 months [95% CI, 9.4-24.2] vs. 6.5 months [1.6-11.3]; p = 0.04). There was a trend toward improved OS in patients who received FOLFIRINOX (median 21.2 months [95% CI, 14.2-28.2]) compared to those who received fixed-dose rate-gemcitabine plus capecitabine (13.6 months [11.8–15.4]; p=0.12). FOLFIRINOX was feasible and effective as neoadjuvant chemotherapy for patients with BRPC and may have improved efficacy compared to a gemcitabine-based regimen. Impact Journals LLC 2017-05-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5542271/ /pubmed/28564637 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.17940 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Yoo et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) (CC-BY), which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Paper Yoo, Changhoon Kang, Jihoon Kim, Kyu-Pyo Lee, Jae-Lyun Ryoo, Baek-Yeol Chang, Heung-Moon Lee, Sang Soo Park, Do Hyun Song, Tae Jun Seo, Dong Wan Lee, Sung Koo Kim, Myung-Hwan Park, Jin-Hong Hwang, Dae Wook Song, Ki Byung Lee, Jae Hoon Kim, Song Cheol Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX for borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma: improved efficacy compared with gemcitabine-based regimen |
title | Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX for borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma: improved efficacy compared with gemcitabine-based regimen |
title_full | Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX for borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma: improved efficacy compared with gemcitabine-based regimen |
title_fullStr | Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX for borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma: improved efficacy compared with gemcitabine-based regimen |
title_full_unstemmed | Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX for borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma: improved efficacy compared with gemcitabine-based regimen |
title_short | Efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant FOLFIRINOX for borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma: improved efficacy compared with gemcitabine-based regimen |
title_sort | efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant folfirinox for borderline resectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma: improved efficacy compared with gemcitabine-based regimen |
topic | Research Paper |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5542271/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28564637 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.17940 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yoochanghoon efficacyandsafetyofneoadjuvantfolfirinoxforborderlineresectablepancreaticadenocarcinomaimprovedefficacycomparedwithgemcitabinebasedregimen AT kangjihoon efficacyandsafetyofneoadjuvantfolfirinoxforborderlineresectablepancreaticadenocarcinomaimprovedefficacycomparedwithgemcitabinebasedregimen AT kimkyupyo efficacyandsafetyofneoadjuvantfolfirinoxforborderlineresectablepancreaticadenocarcinomaimprovedefficacycomparedwithgemcitabinebasedregimen AT leejaelyun efficacyandsafetyofneoadjuvantfolfirinoxforborderlineresectablepancreaticadenocarcinomaimprovedefficacycomparedwithgemcitabinebasedregimen AT ryoobaekyeol efficacyandsafetyofneoadjuvantfolfirinoxforborderlineresectablepancreaticadenocarcinomaimprovedefficacycomparedwithgemcitabinebasedregimen AT changheungmoon efficacyandsafetyofneoadjuvantfolfirinoxforborderlineresectablepancreaticadenocarcinomaimprovedefficacycomparedwithgemcitabinebasedregimen AT leesangsoo efficacyandsafetyofneoadjuvantfolfirinoxforborderlineresectablepancreaticadenocarcinomaimprovedefficacycomparedwithgemcitabinebasedregimen AT parkdohyun efficacyandsafetyofneoadjuvantfolfirinoxforborderlineresectablepancreaticadenocarcinomaimprovedefficacycomparedwithgemcitabinebasedregimen AT songtaejun efficacyandsafetyofneoadjuvantfolfirinoxforborderlineresectablepancreaticadenocarcinomaimprovedefficacycomparedwithgemcitabinebasedregimen AT seodongwan efficacyandsafetyofneoadjuvantfolfirinoxforborderlineresectablepancreaticadenocarcinomaimprovedefficacycomparedwithgemcitabinebasedregimen AT leesungkoo efficacyandsafetyofneoadjuvantfolfirinoxforborderlineresectablepancreaticadenocarcinomaimprovedefficacycomparedwithgemcitabinebasedregimen AT kimmyunghwan efficacyandsafetyofneoadjuvantfolfirinoxforborderlineresectablepancreaticadenocarcinomaimprovedefficacycomparedwithgemcitabinebasedregimen AT parkjinhong efficacyandsafetyofneoadjuvantfolfirinoxforborderlineresectablepancreaticadenocarcinomaimprovedefficacycomparedwithgemcitabinebasedregimen AT hwangdaewook efficacyandsafetyofneoadjuvantfolfirinoxforborderlineresectablepancreaticadenocarcinomaimprovedefficacycomparedwithgemcitabinebasedregimen AT songkibyung efficacyandsafetyofneoadjuvantfolfirinoxforborderlineresectablepancreaticadenocarcinomaimprovedefficacycomparedwithgemcitabinebasedregimen AT leejaehoon efficacyandsafetyofneoadjuvantfolfirinoxforborderlineresectablepancreaticadenocarcinomaimprovedefficacycomparedwithgemcitabinebasedregimen AT kimsongcheol efficacyandsafetyofneoadjuvantfolfirinoxforborderlineresectablepancreaticadenocarcinomaimprovedefficacycomparedwithgemcitabinebasedregimen |