Cargando…

Evaluation and validation of the diagnostic value of the apparent diffusion coefficient for differentiating early-stage endometrial carcinomas from benign mimickers at 3T MRI

Previous researchers obtained various apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) cutoff values to differentiate endometrial carcinoma from benign mimickers with 1.5T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Few studies have used 3T MRI or validated the effectiveness of these cutoff ADC values prospectively. This...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wang, Xue, Zhao, Yu, Hu, Yumin, Zhou, Yongjin, Ye, Xinjian, Liu, Kun, Bai, Guanghui, Guo, Anna, Du, Meimei, Jiang, Lezhen, Wang, Jinhong, Yan, Zhihan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Impact Journals LLC 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5542275/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28634318
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.18553
_version_ 1783254958220509184
author Wang, Xue
Zhao, Yu
Hu, Yumin
Zhou, Yongjin
Ye, Xinjian
Liu, Kun
Bai, Guanghui
Guo, Anna
Du, Meimei
Jiang, Lezhen
Wang, Jinhong
Yan, Zhihan
author_facet Wang, Xue
Zhao, Yu
Hu, Yumin
Zhou, Yongjin
Ye, Xinjian
Liu, Kun
Bai, Guanghui
Guo, Anna
Du, Meimei
Jiang, Lezhen
Wang, Jinhong
Yan, Zhihan
author_sort Wang, Xue
collection PubMed
description Previous researchers obtained various apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) cutoff values to differentiate endometrial carcinoma from benign mimickers with 1.5T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Few studies have used 3T MRI or validated the effectiveness of these cutoff ADC values prospectively. This study was designed in two stages to obtain a cutoff ADC value at 3T MRI and to validate prospectively the role of the ADC value. First, we conducted a retrospective study of 60 patients to evaluate the diagnostic value of ADC by obtain a theoretical cutoff ADC value for differentiating between benign and malignant endometrial lesions. Student's t test revealed that ADC values for stage I endometrial carcinomas were significantly lower than those for benign lesions. The area under the curve value of the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.993, and the cutoff ADC value was 0.98 × 10(−3) mm(2)/s. The sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy of diagnosing stage I endometrial carcinoma were 100%, 97.1%, and 98.3%, respectively. Second, we conducted a prospective study of 26 patients to validate the use of the cutoff ADC value obtained in the study's first stage. The sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy for differentiating malignant from benign endometrial lesions based on the cutoff ADC value obtained earlier were as follows: radiologist 1 attained 86.67%, 100.0%, and 92.31%, respectively; radiologist 2 attained 86.67%, 91.0%, and 88.5%, respectively. Our results suggest that ADC values could be a potential biomarker for use as a quantitative and qualitative tool for differentiating between early-stage endometrial carcinomas and benign mimickers.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5542275
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Impact Journals LLC
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55422752017-08-07 Evaluation and validation of the diagnostic value of the apparent diffusion coefficient for differentiating early-stage endometrial carcinomas from benign mimickers at 3T MRI Wang, Xue Zhao, Yu Hu, Yumin Zhou, Yongjin Ye, Xinjian Liu, Kun Bai, Guanghui Guo, Anna Du, Meimei Jiang, Lezhen Wang, Jinhong Yan, Zhihan Oncotarget Research Paper Previous researchers obtained various apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) cutoff values to differentiate endometrial carcinoma from benign mimickers with 1.5T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Few studies have used 3T MRI or validated the effectiveness of these cutoff ADC values prospectively. This study was designed in two stages to obtain a cutoff ADC value at 3T MRI and to validate prospectively the role of the ADC value. First, we conducted a retrospective study of 60 patients to evaluate the diagnostic value of ADC by obtain a theoretical cutoff ADC value for differentiating between benign and malignant endometrial lesions. Student's t test revealed that ADC values for stage I endometrial carcinomas were significantly lower than those for benign lesions. The area under the curve value of the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.993, and the cutoff ADC value was 0.98 × 10(−3) mm(2)/s. The sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy of diagnosing stage I endometrial carcinoma were 100%, 97.1%, and 98.3%, respectively. Second, we conducted a prospective study of 26 patients to validate the use of the cutoff ADC value obtained in the study's first stage. The sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy for differentiating malignant from benign endometrial lesions based on the cutoff ADC value obtained earlier were as follows: radiologist 1 attained 86.67%, 100.0%, and 92.31%, respectively; radiologist 2 attained 86.67%, 91.0%, and 88.5%, respectively. Our results suggest that ADC values could be a potential biomarker for use as a quantitative and qualitative tool for differentiating between early-stage endometrial carcinomas and benign mimickers. Impact Journals LLC 2017-06-16 /pmc/articles/PMC5542275/ /pubmed/28634318 http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.18553 Text en Copyright: © 2017 Wang et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) (CC-BY), which permits unrestricted use and redistribution provided that the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Paper
Wang, Xue
Zhao, Yu
Hu, Yumin
Zhou, Yongjin
Ye, Xinjian
Liu, Kun
Bai, Guanghui
Guo, Anna
Du, Meimei
Jiang, Lezhen
Wang, Jinhong
Yan, Zhihan
Evaluation and validation of the diagnostic value of the apparent diffusion coefficient for differentiating early-stage endometrial carcinomas from benign mimickers at 3T MRI
title Evaluation and validation of the diagnostic value of the apparent diffusion coefficient for differentiating early-stage endometrial carcinomas from benign mimickers at 3T MRI
title_full Evaluation and validation of the diagnostic value of the apparent diffusion coefficient for differentiating early-stage endometrial carcinomas from benign mimickers at 3T MRI
title_fullStr Evaluation and validation of the diagnostic value of the apparent diffusion coefficient for differentiating early-stage endometrial carcinomas from benign mimickers at 3T MRI
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation and validation of the diagnostic value of the apparent diffusion coefficient for differentiating early-stage endometrial carcinomas from benign mimickers at 3T MRI
title_short Evaluation and validation of the diagnostic value of the apparent diffusion coefficient for differentiating early-stage endometrial carcinomas from benign mimickers at 3T MRI
title_sort evaluation and validation of the diagnostic value of the apparent diffusion coefficient for differentiating early-stage endometrial carcinomas from benign mimickers at 3t mri
topic Research Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5542275/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28634318
http://dx.doi.org/10.18632/oncotarget.18553
work_keys_str_mv AT wangxue evaluationandvalidationofthediagnosticvalueoftheapparentdiffusioncoefficientfordifferentiatingearlystageendometrialcarcinomasfrombenignmimickersat3tmri
AT zhaoyu evaluationandvalidationofthediagnosticvalueoftheapparentdiffusioncoefficientfordifferentiatingearlystageendometrialcarcinomasfrombenignmimickersat3tmri
AT huyumin evaluationandvalidationofthediagnosticvalueoftheapparentdiffusioncoefficientfordifferentiatingearlystageendometrialcarcinomasfrombenignmimickersat3tmri
AT zhouyongjin evaluationandvalidationofthediagnosticvalueoftheapparentdiffusioncoefficientfordifferentiatingearlystageendometrialcarcinomasfrombenignmimickersat3tmri
AT yexinjian evaluationandvalidationofthediagnosticvalueoftheapparentdiffusioncoefficientfordifferentiatingearlystageendometrialcarcinomasfrombenignmimickersat3tmri
AT liukun evaluationandvalidationofthediagnosticvalueoftheapparentdiffusioncoefficientfordifferentiatingearlystageendometrialcarcinomasfrombenignmimickersat3tmri
AT baiguanghui evaluationandvalidationofthediagnosticvalueoftheapparentdiffusioncoefficientfordifferentiatingearlystageendometrialcarcinomasfrombenignmimickersat3tmri
AT guoanna evaluationandvalidationofthediagnosticvalueoftheapparentdiffusioncoefficientfordifferentiatingearlystageendometrialcarcinomasfrombenignmimickersat3tmri
AT dumeimei evaluationandvalidationofthediagnosticvalueoftheapparentdiffusioncoefficientfordifferentiatingearlystageendometrialcarcinomasfrombenignmimickersat3tmri
AT jianglezhen evaluationandvalidationofthediagnosticvalueoftheapparentdiffusioncoefficientfordifferentiatingearlystageendometrialcarcinomasfrombenignmimickersat3tmri
AT wangjinhong evaluationandvalidationofthediagnosticvalueoftheapparentdiffusioncoefficientfordifferentiatingearlystageendometrialcarcinomasfrombenignmimickersat3tmri
AT yanzhihan evaluationandvalidationofthediagnosticvalueoftheapparentdiffusioncoefficientfordifferentiatingearlystageendometrialcarcinomasfrombenignmimickersat3tmri