Factors Contributing to Pelvis Instability in Female Adolescent Athletes During Unilateral Repeated Partial Squat Activity

OBJECTIVES: Unilateral partial squat tasks are often used to assess athletes’ lower extremity (LE) neuromuscular control. Single squat biomechanics such as lateral drop of the non-stance limb’s pelvis have been linked to knee injury risk. Yet, there are limited studies on the factors contributing to pelvic instability during the unilateral partial squat such as anatomical alignment of the knee and hip strength. The purpose of this study was 1) to assess the influence of leg dominance on pelvic drop among female athletes during the repeated unilateral partial squat activity and 2) to investigate the contributions that lower limb kinematics and hip strength have on pelvis drop. METHODS: 42 female athletes (27= softball pitchers, 15=gymnasts, avg age=16.48 ± 2.54 years) underwent lower limb assessment. The quadriceps angle (Q angle) and the average of 3 trials for hip abduction and extension strength (handheld dynamometer measurements) were used for analyses. 3D biomechanical analysis of the repeated unilateral partial squat activity followed using a 20 motion capture camera system which created a 15 segment model of each subject. The subject stood on one leg at the lateral edge of a 17.78 cm box with hands placed on the hips and squatted so that the free hanging contralateral limb came as close to the ground without contact for 5 continuous repetitions. One trial for each limb was performed. Peak pelvic drop and ankle, knee and hip angles and torques (normalized by weight) at this time point were calculated using Visual 3D (C-Motion) biomechanical software. Paired T-test, Spearman correlations and multiple regression model statistical analyses were performed. RESULTS: Peak pelvic drop during the unilateral partial squat did not differ significantly on the basis of limb dominance (p=0.831, Dom: -3.40 ± 5.10° , ND: -3.46 ± 4.44°). Peak pelvic drop displayed a Spearman correlation with the functional measure of hip abduction/adduction (ABD/ADD) angle (r(s)= 0.627, p< 0.001) (Figure 1). No association was noted between peak pelvic drop and anatomical measures of Q angle or isometric hip extension strength. A multiple regression was performed to predict pelvis drop angle from the following 6 variables: isometric hip ABD strength, hip ABD/ADD angle, hip internal/external rotation angle, ankle supination/pronation (S/P) angle, height and weight. These variables statistically predicted pelvis drop, F(6,73) = 17.848, p < .0005, R(2) = 0.595. The strongest combined predictor variables for pelvic drop in the female athletes were hip abduction/ adduction angle and strength followed by subject’s weight and ankle S/P angle (Table 1). CONCLUSION: Peak pelvic drop during the repeated unilateral partial squat activity did not correlate significantly with Q angle and hip extension strength. Instead, peak pelvic drop appears more related to a combination of biomechanical limb positioning, hip ABD strength and subject demographics. The regression model run on the repeated unilateral partial squat demonstrates predictive power of this dynamic assessment tool based on kinematic measures across multiple joints. Results could guide clinician screening for excessive pelvic drop in female athletes and based on the predictive model make recommendations for corrective conditioning to help prevent knee injury and guide return to sport following LE surgery.