Cargando…

Magnetic Resonance Imaging Comparison of Repaired versus Non-Repaired Hip Capsule in Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVES: Techniques used in hip arthroscopy continue to evolve and controversy surrounds the need for capsule repair following surgical intervention. The purposes of this study were to evaluate the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) appearance of the hip capsule in patients with femoroacetabular im...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mei-Dan, Omer Y., Strickland, Colin, Garabekyan, Tigran, Chadayammuri, Vivek, Brick, Matthew, Kraeutler, Matthew John
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5542325/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967117S00231
_version_ 1783254970002309120
author Mei-Dan, Omer Y.
Strickland, Colin
Garabekyan, Tigran
Chadayammuri, Vivek
Brick, Matthew
Kraeutler, Matthew John
author_facet Mei-Dan, Omer Y.
Strickland, Colin
Garabekyan, Tigran
Chadayammuri, Vivek
Brick, Matthew
Kraeutler, Matthew John
author_sort Mei-Dan, Omer Y.
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: Techniques used in hip arthroscopy continue to evolve and controversy surrounds the need for capsule repair following surgical intervention. The purposes of this study were to evaluate the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) appearance of the hip capsule in patients with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) undergoing hip arthroscopy with capsular repair versus non-repair. METHODS: A multicenter clinical trial was performed with 35 patients (50 hips) undergoing hip arthroscopy for treatment of FAI. Each hip was preoperatively randomized to capsular repair versus non-repair. MRI evaluation was performed by a radiologist at 6 and 24 weeks postoperatively. Patients and the radiologist were blinded to the randomization. Capsular defect size and the thickness of the capsule at the capsulotomy site and at locations both proximal and distal to the defect were recorded on each scan to determine their change over time. RESULTS: Compared to patients without capsular repair, those with capsular repair demonstrated significantly decreased mean capsular gapping at articular and muscular portions of the hip capsule at 6 weeks postoperatively (p < 0.001). This difference normalized between the two cohorts by 24 weeks postoperatively, with a significantly decreased mean capsular gapping at articular and muscular attachment sites of the hip capsule compared to 6 weeks postoperatively (p < 0.03). Defects were readily apparent on MRI imaging in regions where the capsule was not repaired. In contrast, irregular capsular thickening without a discrete defect was visible in most cases where the capsule was repaired at the time of arthroscopy. The appearance was variable after 24 weeks. The capsular defects that did close universally showed closure of the defect beginning at the muscular side of the capsule with bridging of capsular tissue then filling in on the articular side. CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic hip capsule repair results in significantly less capsule gapping at 6-week follow-up compared with non-repair, though the difference in gap size normalizes by 24-week follow-up.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5542325
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55423252017-08-24 Magnetic Resonance Imaging Comparison of Repaired versus Non-Repaired Hip Capsule in Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial Mei-Dan, Omer Y. Strickland, Colin Garabekyan, Tigran Chadayammuri, Vivek Brick, Matthew Kraeutler, Matthew John Orthop J Sports Med Article OBJECTIVES: Techniques used in hip arthroscopy continue to evolve and controversy surrounds the need for capsule repair following surgical intervention. The purposes of this study were to evaluate the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) appearance of the hip capsule in patients with femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) undergoing hip arthroscopy with capsular repair versus non-repair. METHODS: A multicenter clinical trial was performed with 35 patients (50 hips) undergoing hip arthroscopy for treatment of FAI. Each hip was preoperatively randomized to capsular repair versus non-repair. MRI evaluation was performed by a radiologist at 6 and 24 weeks postoperatively. Patients and the radiologist were blinded to the randomization. Capsular defect size and the thickness of the capsule at the capsulotomy site and at locations both proximal and distal to the defect were recorded on each scan to determine their change over time. RESULTS: Compared to patients without capsular repair, those with capsular repair demonstrated significantly decreased mean capsular gapping at articular and muscular portions of the hip capsule at 6 weeks postoperatively (p < 0.001). This difference normalized between the two cohorts by 24 weeks postoperatively, with a significantly decreased mean capsular gapping at articular and muscular attachment sites of the hip capsule compared to 6 weeks postoperatively (p < 0.03). Defects were readily apparent on MRI imaging in regions where the capsule was not repaired. In contrast, irregular capsular thickening without a discrete defect was visible in most cases where the capsule was repaired at the time of arthroscopy. The appearance was variable after 24 weeks. The capsular defects that did close universally showed closure of the defect beginning at the muscular side of the capsule with bridging of capsular tissue then filling in on the articular side. CONCLUSION: Arthroscopic hip capsule repair results in significantly less capsule gapping at 6-week follow-up compared with non-repair, though the difference in gap size normalizes by 24-week follow-up. SAGE Publications 2017-07-31 /pmc/articles/PMC5542325/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967117S00231 Text en © The Author(s) 2017 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ This open-access article is published and distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial - No Derivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/), which permits the noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction of the article in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. You may not alter, transform, or build upon this article without the permission of the Author(s). For reprints and permission queries, please visit SAGE’s Web site at http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav.
spellingShingle Article
Mei-Dan, Omer Y.
Strickland, Colin
Garabekyan, Tigran
Chadayammuri, Vivek
Brick, Matthew
Kraeutler, Matthew John
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Comparison of Repaired versus Non-Repaired Hip Capsule in Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial
title Magnetic Resonance Imaging Comparison of Repaired versus Non-Repaired Hip Capsule in Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full Magnetic Resonance Imaging Comparison of Repaired versus Non-Repaired Hip Capsule in Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial
title_fullStr Magnetic Resonance Imaging Comparison of Repaired versus Non-Repaired Hip Capsule in Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial
title_full_unstemmed Magnetic Resonance Imaging Comparison of Repaired versus Non-Repaired Hip Capsule in Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial
title_short Magnetic Resonance Imaging Comparison of Repaired versus Non-Repaired Hip Capsule in Patients Undergoing Hip Arthroscopy for Femoroacetabular Impingement: A Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial
title_sort magnetic resonance imaging comparison of repaired versus non-repaired hip capsule in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement: a double-blind, randomized controlled trial
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5542325/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2325967117S00231
work_keys_str_mv AT meidanomery magneticresonanceimagingcomparisonofrepairedversusnonrepairedhipcapsuleinpatientsundergoinghiparthroscopyforfemoroacetabularimpingementadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT stricklandcolin magneticresonanceimagingcomparisonofrepairedversusnonrepairedhipcapsuleinpatientsundergoinghiparthroscopyforfemoroacetabularimpingementadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT garabekyantigran magneticresonanceimagingcomparisonofrepairedversusnonrepairedhipcapsuleinpatientsundergoinghiparthroscopyforfemoroacetabularimpingementadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT chadayammurivivek magneticresonanceimagingcomparisonofrepairedversusnonrepairedhipcapsuleinpatientsundergoinghiparthroscopyforfemoroacetabularimpingementadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT brickmatthew magneticresonanceimagingcomparisonofrepairedversusnonrepairedhipcapsuleinpatientsundergoinghiparthroscopyforfemoroacetabularimpingementadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial
AT kraeutlermatthewjohn magneticresonanceimagingcomparisonofrepairedversusnonrepairedhipcapsuleinpatientsundergoinghiparthroscopyforfemoroacetabularimpingementadoubleblindrandomizedcontrolledtrial