Cargando…
Cholecystectomy can increase the risk of colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis of 10 cohort studies
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to elucidate the effects of cholecystectomy on the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) by conducting a meta-analysis of 10 cohort studies. METHODS: The eligible cohort studies were selected by searching the PubMed and EMBASE databases from their origination to June 30, 2016,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2017
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5542607/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28771518 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181852 |
_version_ | 1783255023432499200 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Yong Liu, Hao Li, Li Ai, Min Gong, Zheng He, Yong Dong, Yunlong Xu, Shuanglan Wang, Jun Jin, Bo Liu, Jianping Teng, Zhaowei |
author_facet | Zhang, Yong Liu, Hao Li, Li Ai, Min Gong, Zheng He, Yong Dong, Yunlong Xu, Shuanglan Wang, Jun Jin, Bo Liu, Jianping Teng, Zhaowei |
author_sort | Zhang, Yong |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to elucidate the effects of cholecystectomy on the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) by conducting a meta-analysis of 10 cohort studies. METHODS: The eligible cohort studies were selected by searching the PubMed and EMBASE databases from their origination to June 30, 2016, as well as by consulting the reference lists of the selected articles. Two authors individually collected the data from the 10 papers. When the data showed marked heterogeneity, we used a random-effects model to estimate the overall pooled risk; otherwise, a fixed effects model was employed. RESULTS: The final analysis included ten cohort studies. According to the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS), nine papers were considered high quality. After the data of these 9 studies were combined, an increased risk of CRC was found among the individuals who had undergone cholecystectomy (risk ratio (RR) 1.22; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08–1.38). In addition, we also found a promising increased risk for colon cancer (CC) (RR 1.30, 95% CI 1.07–1.58), but no relationship between cholecystectomy and rectum cancer (RC) (RR 1.09; 95% CI 0.89–1.34) was observed. Additionally, in the sub-group analysis of the tumor location in the colon, a positive risk for ascending colon cancer (ACC) was found (RR 1.18, 95% CI 1.11–1.26). After combining the ACC, transverse colon cancer (TCC), sigmoid colon cancer (SCC) and descending colon cancer (DCC) patients, we found a positive relationship with cholecystectomy (RR 1.18, 95% CI 1.11–1.26). Furthermore, after combining the ACC and DCC patients, we also found a positive relationship with cholecystectomy (RR 1.28; 95% CI 1.11–1.26) in the sub-group analysis. In an additional sub-group analysis of patients from Western countries, there was a positive relationship between cholecystectomy and the risk of CRC (RR 1.20; 95% CI 1.05–1.36). Furthermore, a positive relationship between female gender and CRC was also found (RR 1.17; 95% CI 1.03–1.34). However, there was no relationship between gender and CC or RC. Furthermore, no publication bias was observed, and the sensitivity analysis indicated stable results. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis of 10 cohort studies revealed that cholecystectomy is associated with an increased risk for CRC, CC and ACC, particularly in Western countries. No relationship between cholecystectomy and RC was observed. There was no relationship between gender and either CC or RC, but a positive relationship between female gender and CRC was observed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-5542607 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2017 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-55426072017-08-12 Cholecystectomy can increase the risk of colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis of 10 cohort studies Zhang, Yong Liu, Hao Li, Li Ai, Min Gong, Zheng He, Yong Dong, Yunlong Xu, Shuanglan Wang, Jun Jin, Bo Liu, Jianping Teng, Zhaowei PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to elucidate the effects of cholecystectomy on the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) by conducting a meta-analysis of 10 cohort studies. METHODS: The eligible cohort studies were selected by searching the PubMed and EMBASE databases from their origination to June 30, 2016, as well as by consulting the reference lists of the selected articles. Two authors individually collected the data from the 10 papers. When the data showed marked heterogeneity, we used a random-effects model to estimate the overall pooled risk; otherwise, a fixed effects model was employed. RESULTS: The final analysis included ten cohort studies. According to the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS), nine papers were considered high quality. After the data of these 9 studies were combined, an increased risk of CRC was found among the individuals who had undergone cholecystectomy (risk ratio (RR) 1.22; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08–1.38). In addition, we also found a promising increased risk for colon cancer (CC) (RR 1.30, 95% CI 1.07–1.58), but no relationship between cholecystectomy and rectum cancer (RC) (RR 1.09; 95% CI 0.89–1.34) was observed. Additionally, in the sub-group analysis of the tumor location in the colon, a positive risk for ascending colon cancer (ACC) was found (RR 1.18, 95% CI 1.11–1.26). After combining the ACC, transverse colon cancer (TCC), sigmoid colon cancer (SCC) and descending colon cancer (DCC) patients, we found a positive relationship with cholecystectomy (RR 1.18, 95% CI 1.11–1.26). Furthermore, after combining the ACC and DCC patients, we also found a positive relationship with cholecystectomy (RR 1.28; 95% CI 1.11–1.26) in the sub-group analysis. In an additional sub-group analysis of patients from Western countries, there was a positive relationship between cholecystectomy and the risk of CRC (RR 1.20; 95% CI 1.05–1.36). Furthermore, a positive relationship between female gender and CRC was also found (RR 1.17; 95% CI 1.03–1.34). However, there was no relationship between gender and CC or RC. Furthermore, no publication bias was observed, and the sensitivity analysis indicated stable results. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis of 10 cohort studies revealed that cholecystectomy is associated with an increased risk for CRC, CC and ACC, particularly in Western countries. No relationship between cholecystectomy and RC was observed. There was no relationship between gender and either CC or RC, but a positive relationship between female gender and CRC was observed. Public Library of Science 2017-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5542607/ /pubmed/28771518 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181852 Text en © 2017 Zhang et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Zhang, Yong Liu, Hao Li, Li Ai, Min Gong, Zheng He, Yong Dong, Yunlong Xu, Shuanglan Wang, Jun Jin, Bo Liu, Jianping Teng, Zhaowei Cholecystectomy can increase the risk of colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis of 10 cohort studies |
title | Cholecystectomy can increase the risk of colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis of 10 cohort studies |
title_full | Cholecystectomy can increase the risk of colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis of 10 cohort studies |
title_fullStr | Cholecystectomy can increase the risk of colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis of 10 cohort studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Cholecystectomy can increase the risk of colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis of 10 cohort studies |
title_short | Cholecystectomy can increase the risk of colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis of 10 cohort studies |
title_sort | cholecystectomy can increase the risk of colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of 10 cohort studies |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5542607/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28771518 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181852 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangyong cholecystectomycanincreasetheriskofcolorectalcancerametaanalysisof10cohortstudies AT liuhao cholecystectomycanincreasetheriskofcolorectalcancerametaanalysisof10cohortstudies AT lili cholecystectomycanincreasetheriskofcolorectalcancerametaanalysisof10cohortstudies AT aimin cholecystectomycanincreasetheriskofcolorectalcancerametaanalysisof10cohortstudies AT gongzheng cholecystectomycanincreasetheriskofcolorectalcancerametaanalysisof10cohortstudies AT heyong cholecystectomycanincreasetheriskofcolorectalcancerametaanalysisof10cohortstudies AT dongyunlong cholecystectomycanincreasetheriskofcolorectalcancerametaanalysisof10cohortstudies AT xushuanglan cholecystectomycanincreasetheriskofcolorectalcancerametaanalysisof10cohortstudies AT wangjun cholecystectomycanincreasetheriskofcolorectalcancerametaanalysisof10cohortstudies AT jinbo cholecystectomycanincreasetheriskofcolorectalcancerametaanalysisof10cohortstudies AT liujianping cholecystectomycanincreasetheriskofcolorectalcancerametaanalysisof10cohortstudies AT tengzhaowei cholecystectomycanincreasetheriskofcolorectalcancerametaanalysisof10cohortstudies |