Cargando…

Cholecystectomy can increase the risk of colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis of 10 cohort studies

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to elucidate the effects of cholecystectomy on the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) by conducting a meta-analysis of 10 cohort studies. METHODS: The eligible cohort studies were selected by searching the PubMed and EMBASE databases from their origination to June 30, 2016,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Yong, Liu, Hao, Li, Li, Ai, Min, Gong, Zheng, He, Yong, Dong, Yunlong, Xu, Shuanglan, Wang, Jun, Jin, Bo, Liu, Jianping, Teng, Zhaowei
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2017
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5542607/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28771518
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181852
_version_ 1783255023432499200
author Zhang, Yong
Liu, Hao
Li, Li
Ai, Min
Gong, Zheng
He, Yong
Dong, Yunlong
Xu, Shuanglan
Wang, Jun
Jin, Bo
Liu, Jianping
Teng, Zhaowei
author_facet Zhang, Yong
Liu, Hao
Li, Li
Ai, Min
Gong, Zheng
He, Yong
Dong, Yunlong
Xu, Shuanglan
Wang, Jun
Jin, Bo
Liu, Jianping
Teng, Zhaowei
author_sort Zhang, Yong
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to elucidate the effects of cholecystectomy on the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) by conducting a meta-analysis of 10 cohort studies. METHODS: The eligible cohort studies were selected by searching the PubMed and EMBASE databases from their origination to June 30, 2016, as well as by consulting the reference lists of the selected articles. Two authors individually collected the data from the 10 papers. When the data showed marked heterogeneity, we used a random-effects model to estimate the overall pooled risk; otherwise, a fixed effects model was employed. RESULTS: The final analysis included ten cohort studies. According to the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS), nine papers were considered high quality. After the data of these 9 studies were combined, an increased risk of CRC was found among the individuals who had undergone cholecystectomy (risk ratio (RR) 1.22; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08–1.38). In addition, we also found a promising increased risk for colon cancer (CC) (RR 1.30, 95% CI 1.07–1.58), but no relationship between cholecystectomy and rectum cancer (RC) (RR 1.09; 95% CI 0.89–1.34) was observed. Additionally, in the sub-group analysis of the tumor location in the colon, a positive risk for ascending colon cancer (ACC) was found (RR 1.18, 95% CI 1.11–1.26). After combining the ACC, transverse colon cancer (TCC), sigmoid colon cancer (SCC) and descending colon cancer (DCC) patients, we found a positive relationship with cholecystectomy (RR 1.18, 95% CI 1.11–1.26). Furthermore, after combining the ACC and DCC patients, we also found a positive relationship with cholecystectomy (RR 1.28; 95% CI 1.11–1.26) in the sub-group analysis. In an additional sub-group analysis of patients from Western countries, there was a positive relationship between cholecystectomy and the risk of CRC (RR 1.20; 95% CI 1.05–1.36). Furthermore, a positive relationship between female gender and CRC was also found (RR 1.17; 95% CI 1.03–1.34). However, there was no relationship between gender and CC or RC. Furthermore, no publication bias was observed, and the sensitivity analysis indicated stable results. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis of 10 cohort studies revealed that cholecystectomy is associated with an increased risk for CRC, CC and ACC, particularly in Western countries. No relationship between cholecystectomy and RC was observed. There was no relationship between gender and either CC or RC, but a positive relationship between female gender and CRC was observed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-5542607
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2017
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-55426072017-08-12 Cholecystectomy can increase the risk of colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis of 10 cohort studies Zhang, Yong Liu, Hao Li, Li Ai, Min Gong, Zheng He, Yong Dong, Yunlong Xu, Shuanglan Wang, Jun Jin, Bo Liu, Jianping Teng, Zhaowei PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to elucidate the effects of cholecystectomy on the risk of colorectal cancer (CRC) by conducting a meta-analysis of 10 cohort studies. METHODS: The eligible cohort studies were selected by searching the PubMed and EMBASE databases from their origination to June 30, 2016, as well as by consulting the reference lists of the selected articles. Two authors individually collected the data from the 10 papers. When the data showed marked heterogeneity, we used a random-effects model to estimate the overall pooled risk; otherwise, a fixed effects model was employed. RESULTS: The final analysis included ten cohort studies. According to the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS), nine papers were considered high quality. After the data of these 9 studies were combined, an increased risk of CRC was found among the individuals who had undergone cholecystectomy (risk ratio (RR) 1.22; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.08–1.38). In addition, we also found a promising increased risk for colon cancer (CC) (RR 1.30, 95% CI 1.07–1.58), but no relationship between cholecystectomy and rectum cancer (RC) (RR 1.09; 95% CI 0.89–1.34) was observed. Additionally, in the sub-group analysis of the tumor location in the colon, a positive risk for ascending colon cancer (ACC) was found (RR 1.18, 95% CI 1.11–1.26). After combining the ACC, transverse colon cancer (TCC), sigmoid colon cancer (SCC) and descending colon cancer (DCC) patients, we found a positive relationship with cholecystectomy (RR 1.18, 95% CI 1.11–1.26). Furthermore, after combining the ACC and DCC patients, we also found a positive relationship with cholecystectomy (RR 1.28; 95% CI 1.11–1.26) in the sub-group analysis. In an additional sub-group analysis of patients from Western countries, there was a positive relationship between cholecystectomy and the risk of CRC (RR 1.20; 95% CI 1.05–1.36). Furthermore, a positive relationship between female gender and CRC was also found (RR 1.17; 95% CI 1.03–1.34). However, there was no relationship between gender and CC or RC. Furthermore, no publication bias was observed, and the sensitivity analysis indicated stable results. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis of 10 cohort studies revealed that cholecystectomy is associated with an increased risk for CRC, CC and ACC, particularly in Western countries. No relationship between cholecystectomy and RC was observed. There was no relationship between gender and either CC or RC, but a positive relationship between female gender and CRC was observed. Public Library of Science 2017-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC5542607/ /pubmed/28771518 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181852 Text en © 2017 Zhang et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zhang, Yong
Liu, Hao
Li, Li
Ai, Min
Gong, Zheng
He, Yong
Dong, Yunlong
Xu, Shuanglan
Wang, Jun
Jin, Bo
Liu, Jianping
Teng, Zhaowei
Cholecystectomy can increase the risk of colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis of 10 cohort studies
title Cholecystectomy can increase the risk of colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis of 10 cohort studies
title_full Cholecystectomy can increase the risk of colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis of 10 cohort studies
title_fullStr Cholecystectomy can increase the risk of colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis of 10 cohort studies
title_full_unstemmed Cholecystectomy can increase the risk of colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis of 10 cohort studies
title_short Cholecystectomy can increase the risk of colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis of 10 cohort studies
title_sort cholecystectomy can increase the risk of colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis of 10 cohort studies
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5542607/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28771518
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0181852
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangyong cholecystectomycanincreasetheriskofcolorectalcancerametaanalysisof10cohortstudies
AT liuhao cholecystectomycanincreasetheriskofcolorectalcancerametaanalysisof10cohortstudies
AT lili cholecystectomycanincreasetheriskofcolorectalcancerametaanalysisof10cohortstudies
AT aimin cholecystectomycanincreasetheriskofcolorectalcancerametaanalysisof10cohortstudies
AT gongzheng cholecystectomycanincreasetheriskofcolorectalcancerametaanalysisof10cohortstudies
AT heyong cholecystectomycanincreasetheriskofcolorectalcancerametaanalysisof10cohortstudies
AT dongyunlong cholecystectomycanincreasetheriskofcolorectalcancerametaanalysisof10cohortstudies
AT xushuanglan cholecystectomycanincreasetheriskofcolorectalcancerametaanalysisof10cohortstudies
AT wangjun cholecystectomycanincreasetheriskofcolorectalcancerametaanalysisof10cohortstudies
AT jinbo cholecystectomycanincreasetheriskofcolorectalcancerametaanalysisof10cohortstudies
AT liujianping cholecystectomycanincreasetheriskofcolorectalcancerametaanalysisof10cohortstudies
AT tengzhaowei cholecystectomycanincreasetheriskofcolorectalcancerametaanalysisof10cohortstudies